Report Summary

  • 13

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 60% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 94

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

vitradirect.be

Designcollectors - The biggest stock in Europe of Design furniture!

Page Load Speed

9.5 sec in total

First Response

570 ms

Resources Loaded

8.6 sec

Page Rendered

270 ms

vitradirect.be screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Vitradirect content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about vitradirect.be

Designcollectors - The biggest stock in Europe of Vitra, Artek, Knoll, Thonet, Classicon, Santa & Cole, Maharam, Kay Bojesen, Iittala furniture!

Visit vitradirect.be

Key Findings

We analyzed Vitradirect.be page load time and found that the first response time was 570 ms and then it took 8.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

vitradirect.be performance score

13

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

29/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.2 s

30/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,290 ms

18/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.251

1/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.2 s

12/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

vitradirect.be

570 ms

master.css

179 ms

slider.css

176 ms

manual.css

183 ms

giftlist.css

185 ms

Our browser made a total of 174 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (168 requests) were addressed to the original Vitradirect.be, 1% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Static.hotjar.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Vitradirect.be.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 633.8 kB (12%)

Content Size

5.3 MB

After Optimization

4.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Vitradirect.be main page is 5.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 41.0 kB

  • Original 49.8 kB
  • After minification 40.2 kB
  • After compression 8.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.6 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.0 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 211.6 kB

  • Original 4.7 MB
  • After minification 4.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vitradirect images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 328.1 kB

  • Original 447.1 kB
  • After minification 416.4 kB
  • After compression 119.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 328.1 kB or 73% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 53.2 kB

  • Original 66.4 kB
  • After minification 54.5 kB
  • After compression 13.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vitradirect.be needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 53.2 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (21%)

Requests Now

173

After Optimization

136

The browser has sent 173 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vitradirect. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

vitradirect.be accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

vitradirect.be best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

vitradirect.be SEO score

94

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vitradirect.be can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vitradirect.be main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Vitradirect. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: