3.2 sec in total
270 ms
2.2 sec
769 ms
Welcome to vivanoda.com homepage info - get ready to check Vivanoda best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about vivanoda.com
Find the best way to travel, save money and time with a travel planner that compares and combines different modes of transport. Find all your train, bus, ferry and plane tickets at the best price.
Visit vivanoda.comWe analyzed Vivanoda.com page load time and found that the first response time was 270 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
vivanoda.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
13/100
10%
Value5.0 s
27/100
25%
Value4.7 s
69/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.014
100/100
15%
Value4.7 s
80/100
10%
270 ms
765 ms
487 ms
27 ms
66 ms
Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Vivanoda.com, 8% (4 requests) were made to Static.vivanoda.com and 8% (4 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (897 ms) belongs to the original domain Vivanoda.com.
Page size can be reduced by 173.5 kB (38%)
461.4 kB
288.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Vivanoda.com main page is 461.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 221.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 153.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 153.0 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vivanoda images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 12 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 460 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vivanoda.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (67%)
45
15
The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vivanoda. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
vivanoda.com
270 ms
www.vivanoda.com
765 ms
main.min.css
487 ms
all.min.css
27 ms
js
66 ms
datepicker-bs5.min.css
19 ms
datepicker-full.min.js
21 ms
bootstrap.bundle.min.js
24 ms
main.min.js
384 ms
css2
33 ms
layered-waves-8.png
175 ms
logo-vivanoda.svg
173 ms
flags.png
309 ms
where-to-go.png
358 ms
multimodal.png
428 ms
fare-compare.png
432 ms
book-ticket.png
431 ms
1491.jpg
327 ms
1536.jpg
329 ms
1520.jpg
408 ms
1502.jpg
410 ms
1489.jpg
438 ms
1483.jpg
492 ms
1551.jpg
492 ms
1537.jpg
509 ms
1591.jpg
510 ms
1589.jpg
511 ms
8.jpg
520 ms
1618.jpg
573 ms
1588.jpg
573 ms
1582.jpg
589 ms
1682.jpg
592 ms
1644.jpg
593 ms
17.jpg
617 ms
1983.jpg
664 ms
1677.jpg
654 ms
ETIC6.png
773 ms
thefoxmagazine.JPG
673 ms
FranceInfo.jpg
673 ms
telematin.jpg
698 ms
afp.png
867 ms
lefigaro.png
847 ms
M6.jpg
753 ms
lechobe.png
897 ms
publico.png
862 ms
sapo.png
864 ms
rtbf.png
866 ms
fa-solid-900.ttf
31 ms
fa-regular-400.ttf
60 ms
Millimetre-Bold.woff
89 ms
Millimetre-Regular.woff
106 ms
fa-brands-400.ttf
49 ms
vivanoda.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
vivanoda.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Page has valid source maps
vivanoda.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vivanoda.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vivanoda.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
vivanoda.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Vivanoda. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: