Tools & Wizards About Us
vivaturf.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 59

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

vivaturf.com

VIVATURF | Leading solution provider of artificial yarn and turf| Artificial Grass| Synthetic Turf

Page Load Speed

4.9 sec in total

First Response

394 ms

Resources Loaded

4.2 sec

Page Rendered

384 ms

vivaturf.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing VIVATURF content for Kazakhstan. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about vivaturf.com

Vivaturf is a leading solution provider specializes in R&D, manufacturing, sales and after-sales service for sports and landscaping artificial turf and related products.

Visit vivaturf.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Vivaturf.com page load time and found that the first response time was 394 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

vivaturf.com performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

17/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.4 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.4 s

57/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value470 ms

61/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.6 s

47/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

vivaturf.com

394 ms

vivaturf.com

271 ms

www.vivaturf.com

810 ms

global.js

271 ms

cssV2.css

280 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Vivaturf.com, 90% (54 requests) were made to Usimg.bjyyb.net and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) relates to the external source Usimg.bjyyb.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 350.1 kB (6%)

Content Size

6.0 MB

After Optimization

5.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Vivaturf.com main page is 6.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 133.8 kB

  • Original 155.1 kB
  • After minification 154.2 kB
  • After compression 21.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 133.8 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 215.8 kB

  • Original 5.6 MB
  • After minification 5.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. VIVATURF images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 348 B

  • Original 132.8 kB
  • After minification 132.8 kB
  • After compression 132.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 176 B

  • Original 34.1 kB
  • After minification 34.1 kB
  • After compression 33.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vivaturf.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (43%)

Requests Now

53

After Optimization

30

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of VIVATURF. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

vivaturf.com

vivaturf.com

394 ms

vivaturf.com

vivaturf.com

271 ms

www.vivaturf.com

www.vivaturf.com

810 ms

global.js

global.js

271 ms

cssV2.css

cssV2.css

280 ms

js

js

61 ms

easy.min.js

easy.min.js

140 ms

login.js

login.js

138 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

53 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

54 ms

grey.png

grey.png

34 ms

grey.png

grey.png

34 ms

leyingbao_anfan2.png

leyingbao_anfan2.png

226 ms

englandflagcircle.png

englandflagcircle.png

19 ms

iconfont.woff

iconfont.woff

69 ms

iconfont.svg

iconfont.svg

468 ms

iconfont.ttf

iconfont.ttf

71 ms

iconfont.ttf

iconfont.ttf

70 ms

23.easy.min.js

23.easy.min.js

196 ms

9.easy.min.js

9.easy.min.js

13 ms

5.easy.min.js

5.easy.min.js

205 ms

1.easy.min.js

1.easy.min.js

212 ms

13.easy.min.js

13.easy.min.js

213 ms

12.easy.min.js

12.easy.min.js

268 ms

16.easy.min.js

16.easy.min.js

398 ms

27.easy.min.js

27.easy.min.js

395 ms

2.easy.min.js

2.easy.min.js

232 ms

20.easy.min.js

20.easy.min.js

429 ms

24.easy.min.js

24.easy.min.js

454 ms

17.easy.min.js

17.easy.min.js

431 ms

18.easy.min.js

18.easy.min.js

503 ms

3.easy.min.js

3.easy.min.js

550 ms

25.easy.min.js

25.easy.min.js

620 ms

29.easy.min.js

29.easy.min.js

656 ms

21.easy.min.js

21.easy.min.js

623 ms

30.easy.min.js

30.easy.min.js

718 ms

bx_loader.gif

bx_loader.gif

467 ms

controls.png

controls.png

470 ms

20230214153215857.png

20230214153215857.png

393 ms

20230214153214736.png

20230214153214736.png

290 ms

20230214153214597.png

20230214153214597.png

341 ms

20230214153213908.png

20230214153213908.png

237 ms

20200507103713317.png

20200507103713317.png

29 ms

20200507103714229.png

20200507103714229.png

272 ms

20230214154832646.png@!w400

20230214154832646.png@!w400

341 ms

20200602143306807.png

20200602143306807.png

443 ms

20200602143307770.png

20200602143307770.png

579 ms

20200430102856279.png

20200430102856279.png

515 ms

20200430102856463.png

20200430102856463.png

546 ms

20200430102857203.png

20200430102857203.png

544 ms

20200430102856515.png@!w400

20200430102856515.png@!w400

577 ms

20200430102857343.png

20200430102857343.png

790 ms

20200417101638803.png

20200417101638803.png

821 ms

20200507202639282.jpg

20200507202639282.jpg

1247 ms

20200507115130544.jpg

20200507115130544.jpg

1298 ms

20200507151722665.jpg

20200507151722665.jpg

1253 ms

20200521155800836.jpg@!jw1600

20200521155800836.jpg@!jw1600

1229 ms

20200507162515358.jpg

20200507162515358.jpg

1443 ms

20191104163606638.jpg@!jw1600

20191104163606638.jpg@!jw1600

1371 ms

20200420162311107.jpg@!jw600

20200420162311107.jpg@!jw600

1671 ms

Accessibility Review

vivaturf.com accessibility score

59

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

[role] values are not valid

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

vivaturf.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

vivaturf.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    FORMURL

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vivaturf.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Vivaturf.com main page’s claimed encoding is formurl. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

vivaturf.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of VIVATURF. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: