1.4 sec in total
154 ms
1.2 sec
68 ms
Visit vividlite.com now to see the best up-to-date Vivid Lite content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about vividlite.com
TAKE CONTROL OF COLOR. THE MOST VERSATILE WIRELESS SMART LIGHTS. ANYTIME. ANYWHERE.
Visit vividlite.comWe analyzed Vividlite.com page load time and found that the first response time was 154 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
vividlite.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
53/100
10%
Value9.9 s
0/100
25%
Value8.3 s
19/100
10%
Value19,130 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.015
100/100
15%
Value27.2 s
0/100
10%
154 ms
68 ms
49 ms
46 ms
76 ms
Our browser made a total of 162 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Vividlite.com, 93% (151 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 3% (5 requests) were made to Frog.wix.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (269 ms) relates to the external source Static.parastorage.com.
Page size can be reduced by 689.7 kB (62%)
1.1 MB
421.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Vividlite.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 64.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 64.4 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 624.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 624.7 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 557 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vividlite.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 154 (97%)
159
5
The browser has sent 159 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vivid Lite. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 150 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
vividlite.com
154 ms
www.vividlite.com
68 ms
require.min.js
49 ms
main-r.min.js
46 ms
bt
76 ms
UpgradeBrowser.js
42 ms
1b16af_d8adf4e9d3456648aebdcdfc5f3a7712_490.json.z
96 ms
1b16af_0d13d96f9cef0e29b99a38e286d4f1c2_486.json.z
76 ms
ugc-viewer
26 ms
bt
28 ms
react-with-addons.min.js
25 ms
lodash.min.js
28 ms
wixCodeInit.min.js
27 ms
coreUtils.js
49 ms
coreUtils.min.js
64 ms
skins.min.js
88 ms
components.min.js
79 ms
core.min.js
88 ms
mobx.umd.min.js
81 ms
mobx-react.min.js
85 ms
TweenMax.min.js
90 ms
animations.min.js
88 ms
react-with-addons.min.js
91 ms
layout.min.js
258 ms
wixappsCore.min.js
258 ms
wixappsClassics.min.js
260 ms
container.min.js
258 ms
imageZoom.min.js
257 ms
mediaZoom.min.js
259 ms
imageZoomDisplayer.min.js
260 ms
matrixGallery.min.js
265 ms
slideShowGallery.min.js
260 ms
comboBoxInput.min.js
259 ms
dialogs.min.js
261 ms
table.min.js
262 ms
wixappsBuilder.min.js
262 ms
tpa.min.js
262 ms
dataFixer.min.js
265 ms
siteUtils.min.js
264 ms
image.min.js
266 ms
balata.min.js
264 ms
translationsUtils.min.js
266 ms
hammer.min.js
266 ms
utils.min.js
269 ms
fonts.min.js
268 ms
platformUtils-bundle.js
265 ms
loggingUtils.min.js
261 ms
imageClientApi.js
258 ms
swfobject.min.js
238 ms
santaProps.min.js
232 ms
displayer.min.js
219 ms
9a217a6607f9475585cc00e9f5804bf9.svg
194 ms
mousetrap.min.js
205 ms
DrawSVGPlugin.min.js
198 ms
react-dom.min.js
198 ms
ScrollToPlugin.min.js
199 ms
widgets.min.js
197 ms
react-dom-server.min.js
196 ms
imageCommon.min.js
195 ms
formCommon.min.js
187 ms
textCommon.min.js
140 ms
containerCommon.min.js
140 ms
socialCommon.min.js
139 ms
galleriesCommon.min.js
139 ms
buttonCommon.min.js
138 ms
compDesignUtils.min.js
139 ms
mediaCommon.min.js
138 ms
audioCommon.min.js
137 ms
skinExports.min.js
137 ms
compUtils.min.js
136 ms
mobileLayoutUtils.js
136 ms
pm-rpc.min.js
136 ms
tweenEngine.min.js
137 ms
multilingual.min.js
136 ms
render.min.js
135 ms
color.min.js
134 ms
zepto.min.js
134 ms
xss.min.js
133 ms
bluebird.min.js
134 ms
imageClientApi.min.js
133 ms
column.min.js
132 ms
siteBackground.min.js
132 ms
hoverBox.min.js
132 ms
mediaContainerFactory.min.js
132 ms
internalMarkings.min.js
132 ms
repeater.min.js
131 ms
zoomedImage.min.js
131 ms
menuButton.min.js
131 ms
messageView.min.js
86 ms
backgroundCommon.min.js
59 ms
bt
94 ms
css
76 ms
TweenMax.min.js
24 ms
svgShape.min.js
13 ms
adminLoginButton.min.js
13 ms
wTwitterFollow.min.js
14 ms
facebookComments.min.js
14 ms
verticalAnchorsMenu.min.js
14 ms
facebookShare.min.js
16 ms
vKShareButton.min.js
17 ms
youTubeSubscribeButton.min.js
16 ms
itunesButton.min.js
15 ms
skypeCallButton.min.js
16 ms
fileUploader.min.js
27 ms
pinItPinWidget.min.js
26 ms
popupCloseTextButton.min.js
26 ms
radioButton.min.js
26 ms
radioGroup.min.js
25 ms
documentMedia.min.js
25 ms
datePicker.min.js
30 ms
contactForm.min.js
28 ms
subscribeForm.min.js
28 ms
textArea.min.js
27 ms
loginSocialBar.min.js
25 ms
googleMap.min.js
28 ms
soundCloudWidget.min.js
30 ms
paypalButton.min.js
29 ms
imageButton.min.js
30 ms
linkBar.min.js
32 ms
spotifyPlayer.min.js
31 ms
spotifyFollow.min.js
32 ms
twitterFeed.min.js
33 ms
backToTopButton.min.js
32 ms
svgCommon.min.js
44 ms
facebookLike.min.js
46 ms
facebookLikeBox.min.js
46 ms
flickrBadgeWidget.min.js
44 ms
rssButton.min.js
46 ms
tinyMenu.min.js
42 ms
groupContainer.min.js
43 ms
wGooglePlusOne.min.js
41 ms
pinterestPinIt.min.js
43 ms
pinterestFollow.min.js
42 ms
wTwitterTweet.min.js
38 ms
audioPlayer.min.js
40 ms
loginButton.min.js
40 ms
htmlComponent.min.js
40 ms
deadComponent.min.js
41 ms
mediaPlayer.min.js
34 ms
mediaControls.min.js
32 ms
singleAudioPlayer.min.js
32 ms
quickActionBar.min.js
32 ms
boxSlideShowSlide.min.js
32 ms
stripSlideShowSlide.min.js
33 ms
page.min.js
32 ms
bgImageStrip.min.js
32 ms
popupContainer.min.js
32 ms
stripContainer.min.js
32 ms
stripColumnsContainer.min.js
31 ms
exitMobileModeButton.min.js
32 ms
tpaGalleries.min.js
31 ms
flashComponent.min.js
31 ms
stripSlideShow.min.js
31 ms
mobileActionsMenu.min.js
30 ms
verticalMenu.min.js
30 ms
disqusComments.min.js
30 ms
checkbox.min.js
31 ms
gridComponent.min.js
30 ms
languageSelector.min.js
39 ms
lodash.min.js
6 ms
bt
3 ms
languages.css
43 ms
vividlite.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
vividlite.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
vividlite.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vividlite.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Vividlite.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
vividlite.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Vivid Lite. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: