9.3 sec in total
421 ms
8.5 sec
373 ms
Welcome to viviga.com homepage info - get ready to check Viviga best content right away, or after learning these important things about viviga.com
Buy the domain name Viviga.com and launch your business with a premium domain and a high quality logo.
Visit viviga.comWe analyzed Viviga.com page load time and found that the first response time was 421 ms and then it took 8.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
viviga.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.8 s
88/100
10%
Value5.8 s
15/100
25%
Value3.2 s
92/100
10%
Value1,590 ms
12/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value14.9 s
8/100
10%
421 ms
2392 ms
1746 ms
1695 ms
1766 ms
Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Viviga.com, 6% (4 requests) were made to Assets.zendesk.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Ws.sharethis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.3 sec) relates to the external source Brandroot.com.
Page size can be reduced by 937.9 kB (65%)
1.4 MB
501.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Viviga.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 729.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 198.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 198.1 kB or 89% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Viviga images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 496.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 496.6 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 228.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Viviga.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 228.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (51%)
59
29
The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Viviga. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
viviga
421 ms
viviga
2392 ms
mootools-core.js
1746 ms
core.js
1695 ms
jquery-1.8.3.min.js
1766 ms
k2.js
1685 ms
brand_featured.js
1684 ms
price_search.js
1695 ms
brandroot.css
1978 ms
common.js
1879 ms
fav.js
1904 ms
brand_detail_page.js
1844 ms
allinone.js
1966 ms
customize-twitter-1.1.min.js
1856 ms
buttons.js
2129 ms
zenbox.js
2096 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
2095 ms
ga.js
154 ms
redX.png
506 ms
favbar-scroll-left.png
584 ms
favbar-scroll-right.png
585 ms
f.png
584 ms
t.png
1652 ms
new_logo.png
1654 ms
drop.png
1654 ms
top-arrow.png
2675 ms
btnHideSearch.png
2668 ms
viviga.png
2665 ms
favorite.png
2664 ms
more.png
2671 ms
footerimg.png
2789 ms
TNW_logo_2012.png
2828 ms
killerstartups.png
2856 ms
topitem_bg.png
2856 ms
top_bg.png
2871 ms
search_top.png
2883 ms
website_bg.png
2956 ms
helvetica-webfont.woff
3027 ms
lucida_grande-webfont.woff
3113 ms
lucida_grande_bold-webfont.woff
3064 ms
sprites.png
3246 ms
sold_line.png
3039 ms
myriadpro-bold-webfont.woff
3112 ms
Helvetica_cyr-Bold.woff
3178 ms
MyriadPro-Regular.woff
3324 ms
__utm.gif
319 ms
widgets.js
402 ms
badge_appstore-lrg.svg
336 ms
tab_support.png
492 ms
getSegment.php
102 ms
close_big.png
196 ms
loading.html
195 ms
collect
138 ms
t.dhj
59 ms
ga-audiences
52 ms
overlay.png
2714 ms
t.dhj
25 ms
hbpix
140 ms
cm
91 ms
load_large.gif
73 ms
s-3271.xgi
8 ms
6 ms
40 ms
xrefid.xgi
12 ms
img;m=11022203137504;cache=
106 ms
index.html
68 ms
buttons-secure.css
44 ms
st.125da8bfe70ad3e00a35a6e4c65d8bc5.js
35 ms
roundtrip.js
65 ms
viviga.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
viviga.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
viviga.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Viviga.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Viviga.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
viviga.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Viviga. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: