Tools & Wizards About Us
vivocontact.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    62% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 44% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

vivocontact.com

VIVO Contact Email direct marketing,mobile direct marketing,V-coupon

Page Load Speed

17.2 sec in total

First Response

471 ms

Resources Loaded

16.6 sec

Page Rendered

126 ms

vivocontact.com screenshot

About Website

Visit vivocontact.com now to see the best up-to-date VIVO Contact content for Hong Kong and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about vivocontact.com

Email direct marketing system design and fulfil the Unsolicited Electronic Messages Ordinance. Start your free trial now. Not require to install any sofware and hardware.

Visit vivocontact.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Vivocontact.com page load time and found that the first response time was 471 ms and then it took 16.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

vivocontact.com performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.8 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value17.0 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value220 ms

88/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.007

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.1 s

20/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

vivocontact.com

471 ms

www.vivocontact.com

445 ms

www.vivocontact.com

943 ms

screen.css

649 ms

main.css

651 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Vivocontact.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googleadservices.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (9.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Vivocontact.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 482.3 kB (31%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Vivocontact.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 8.2 kB

  • Original 11.6 kB
  • After minification 10.9 kB
  • After compression 3.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.2 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 94.4 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 939.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. VIVO Contact images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 245.0 kB

  • Original 335.3 kB
  • After minification 202.6 kB
  • After compression 90.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 245.0 kB or 73% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 134.7 kB

  • Original 155.4 kB
  • After minification 120.9 kB
  • After compression 20.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vivocontact.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 134.7 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (25%)

Requests Now

53

After Optimization

40

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of VIVO Contact. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

vivocontact.com

vivocontact.com

471 ms

www.vivocontact.com

www.vivocontact.com

445 ms

www.vivocontact.com

www.vivocontact.com

943 ms

screen.css

screen.css

649 ms

main.css

main.css

651 ms

form.css

form.css

654 ms

fonts.css

fonts.css

666 ms

style.css

style.css

1555 ms

prettyCheckboxes.css

prettyCheckboxes.css

677 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

4131 ms

jquery.switchable-2.0.min.js

jquery.switchable-2.0.min.js

1305 ms

prettyCheckboxes.js

prettyCheckboxes.js

1318 ms

common.js

common.js

1326 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

85 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

71 ms

bg.png

bg.png

643 ms

logo.png

logo.png

662 ms

menu_bg.png

menu_bg.png

662 ms

banner01.jpg

banner01.jpg

3143 ms

banner02.jpg

banner02.jpg

3158 ms

banner03.jpg

banner03.jpg

2051 ms

banner05.jpg

banner05.jpg

2423 ms

hbg_s.png

hbg_s.png

1314 ms

t_edm.png

t_edm.png

1563 ms

edm.jpg

edm.jpg

3851 ms

t_market.png

t_market.png

2210 ms

marketing.jpg

marketing.jpg

3098 ms

t_coupon.png

t_coupon.png

2852 ms

coupon.jpg

coupon.jpg

3292 ms

t_event.png

t_event.png

3522 ms

event.jpg

event.jpg

3953 ms

icon16.png

icon16.png

3807 ms

home_panel_bg.jpg

home_panel_bg.jpg

4068 ms

logo01.jpg

logo01.jpg

4151 ms

logo02.jpg

logo02.jpg

4397 ms

logo03.jpg

logo03.jpg

4918 ms

logo04.jpg

logo04.jpg

4727 ms

logo05.jpg

logo05.jpg

4825 ms

logo06.jpg

logo06.jpg

4932 ms

logo07.jpg

logo07.jpg

5015 ms

logo08.jpg

logo08.jpg

6165 ms

logo09.jpg

logo09.jpg

7874 ms

logo10.jpg

logo10.jpg

6116 ms

logo11.jpg

logo11.jpg

6840 ms

logo12.jpg

logo12.jpg

5781 ms

she.jpg

she.jpg

5666 ms

openrice.png

openrice.png

6508 ms

baby_kingdom.png

baby_kingdom.png

6857 ms

payment.png

payment.png

6980 ms

caring.png

caring.png

7015 ms

59 ms

Baskerville-Regular.ttf

Baskerville-Regular.ttf

9891 ms

collect

collect

13 ms

js

js

69 ms

31 ms

print.css

print.css

649 ms

Accessibility Review

vivocontact.com accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

vivocontact.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

vivocontact.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vivocontact.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vivocontact.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

vivocontact.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of VIVO Contact. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: