1.9 sec in total
127 ms
1.5 sec
296 ms
Click here to check amazing Vivo Inc content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about vivoinc.com
We get that our clients, consultants, and partners come to back to us, over and over, because we don’t waste their time. Because we work smart, and fast.
Visit vivoinc.comWe analyzed Vivoinc.com page load time and found that the first response time was 127 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
vivoinc.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.2 s
8/100
10%
Value8.2 s
2/100
25%
Value7.7 s
25/100
10%
Value1,060 ms
25/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value11.6 s
18/100
10%
127 ms
251 ms
19 ms
40 ms
153 ms
Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (73 requests) were addressed to the original Vivoinc.com, 13% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (291 ms) belongs to the original domain Vivoinc.com.
Page size can be reduced by 115.2 kB (10%)
1.2 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Vivoinc.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 608.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 77.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 77.5 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vivo Inc images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 14.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 23.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vivoinc.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 65 (87%)
75
10
The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vivo Inc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 30 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
vivoinc.com
127 ms
vivoinc.com
251 ms
dashicons.min.css
19 ms
jquery-ui-dialog.min.css
40 ms
css
153 ms
global.css
42 ms
layerslider.css
38 ms
css
58 ms
style.min.css
43 ms
settings.css
48 ms
style.css
50 ms
style.css
53 ms
frontend.min.css
62 ms
flatpickr.min.css
65 ms
select2.min.css
53 ms
style.css
59 ms
stylesheet.min.css
82 ms
style_dynamic.php
240 ms
font-awesome.min.css
68 ms
style.min.css
73 ms
ionicons.min.css
131 ms
style.css
74 ms
simple-line-icons.css
128 ms
dripicons.css
133 ms
responsive.min.css
135 ms
style_dynamic_responsive.php
291 ms
js_composer.min.css
152 ms
custom_css.css
142 ms
webkit_stylesheet.css
144 ms
css
54 ms
style.css
146 ms
jquery.min.js
176 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
149 ms
circle-progress.js
176 ms
global.js
177 ms
greensock.js
180 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
181 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
180 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
179 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
181 ms
js
141 ms
flatpickr.min.js
179 ms
select2.min.js
174 ms
core.min.js
154 ms
mouse.min.js
156 ms
resizable.min.js
152 ms
draggable.min.js
149 ms
controlgroup.min.js
144 ms
checkboxradio.min.js
154 ms
button.min.js
145 ms
dialog.min.js
148 ms
wpdialog.min.js
141 ms
frontend.min.js
146 ms
qode-like.js
147 ms
plugins.js
164 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.js
157 ms
jquery.fullPage.min.js
147 ms
lemmon-slider.js
98 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
104 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
108 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
108 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
106 ms
default_dynamic.php
277 ms
default.min.js
111 ms
style.css
102 ms
custom_js.php
207 ms
comment-reply.min.js
84 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
93 ms
gtm.js
265 ms
Vivo-tagline-logo.png
83 ms
vivo_logo_New-white-with-tag.png
83 ms
inc-5000-logo.png
83 ms
sf-business-times-top-100-logo.jpg
82 ms
sf-business-times-top-100-woman.jpg
86 ms
vivo_logo_white-292x90.png
250 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc9.ttf
95 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfChc9.ttf
96 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc9.ttf
174 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxP.ttf
173 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc9.ttf
230 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxGIzc.ttf
228 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
93 ms
loading-image.jpg
136 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xGIzc.ttf
114 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ACc0CsE.ttf
116 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc0CsE.ttf
114 ms
KFOiCnqEu92Fr1Mu51QrEz4dKg.ttf
117 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic0CsE.ttf
117 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TLBCc0CsE.ttf
117 ms
home-slider-smaller.jpg
24 ms
vivoinc.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
vivoinc.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
vivoinc.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vivoinc.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vivoinc.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
vivoinc.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Vivo Inc. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: