2.8 sec in total
325 ms
2.1 sec
366 ms
Visit vivor.net now to see the best up-to-date Vivor content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about vivor.net
Vivor biedt betrouwbare webhosting inclusief domeinnaam vanaf slechts € 2,95 p/m! ★★★★★ Altijd binnen 5 minuten online (webhosting met domeinnaam).
Visit vivor.netWe analyzed Vivor.net page load time and found that the first response time was 325 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
vivor.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
39/100
10%
Value6.2 s
11/100
25%
Value5.9 s
48/100
10%
Value1,430 ms
15/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value5.1 s
75/100
10%
325 ms
595 ms
279 ms
265 ms
351 ms
Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Vivor.net, 2% (1 request) were made to Service.vivor.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (630 ms) belongs to the original domain Vivor.net.
Page size can be reduced by 38.2 kB (20%)
189.3 kB
151.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Vivor.net main page is 189.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 134.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 28.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.1 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.2 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vivor images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 334 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 22 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vivor.net has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (37%)
49
31
The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vivor. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.
vivor.net
325 ms
www.vivor.net
595 ms
jquery.js,status.js,dropdown.js,livesearch.js,swfobject.js,iepngfix_tilebg.js,easySlider1.5.js,slideactiv.js,packpop.js,windowpop.js,domainsearch.js,vivor2010.js
279 ms
shadowbox.css
265 ms
shadowbox.js
351 ms
vivor2010-layout.css,vivor2010-style.css,vivor2010-navbar.css
311 ms
loading3.gif
124 ms
topbar_bg_gr.png
125 ms
topbar_bg.png
121 ms
vivor.png
121 ms
topbar_bg_rechts.png
175 ms
innertoptab.png
176 ms
vivbg.png
182 ms
contentbg_side.png
198 ms
drop.png
256 ms
hrline.gif
267 ms
vivor_logo_nav.png
266 ms
vivorpacks.png
272 ms
servers_transparent.png
291 ms
nav_phone.png
294 ms
contentbg.png
341 ms
home_header.jpg
437 ms
spacer.gif
348 ms
vivorbox_experience.png
360 ms
vivor_cpanel.png
372 ms
sb_introvideo.png
385 ms
sb_twitter.png
425 ms
ico_info_cf.png
440 ms
noc-ico.gif
450 ms
shield-ico.gif
462 ms
referenties-ico.gif
475 ms
ico-voorwaarden.gif
511 ms
contact-ico.gif
518 ms
logo_ideal2.png
525 ms
logo_paypal2.png
542 ms
logo_cpanel2.png
552 ms
logo_cleanbits.png
567 ms
logo_amsix.png
595 ms
logo_sidn.png
604 ms
logo_ispgids.png
609 ms
logo_bizp.png
630 ms
extlogin.php
577 ms
logo_windows.png
530 ms
logo_osx.png
548 ms
ico_video.png
569 ms
blokje_nieuws3.jpg
576 ms
blokje_onderhoud3.jpg
580 ms
2010_blokbreed.jpg
563 ms
2010_blokbreed_close.jpg
567 ms
sb_bg.png
580 ms
footerbg.png
580 ms
vivor.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
<object> elements do not have alternate text
vivor.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
vivor.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
NL
NL
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vivor.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vivor.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
vivor.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Vivor. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: