Tools & Wizards About Us
vizesfal.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

vizesfal.net

Főoldal - Salétromos, vizes épületek AQUAPOL szigetelése - www.vizesfal.net

Page Load Speed

4.7 sec in total

First Response

437 ms

Resources Loaded

3.8 sec

Page Rendered

494 ms

vizesfal.net screenshot

About Website

Visit vizesfal.net now to see the best up-to-date Vizes Fal content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about vizesfal.net

Vizes, nedves, salétromos, dohszagú, penészes falak AQUAPOL szigetelése, 20 év garanciával, az Ország bármely területén!

Visit vizesfal.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Vizesfal.net page load time and found that the first response time was 437 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

vizesfal.net performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

58/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

49/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.9 s

47/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,480 ms

14/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.271

45/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.7 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

vizesfal.net

437 ms

style.css

349 ms

Verdana.css

349 ms

style.css

347 ms

Navigator.css

351 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Vizesfal.net, 5% (3 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) relates to the external source Cegmax.hu.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 657.8 kB (59%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

455.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Vizesfal.net main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 528.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 32.0 kB

  • Original 41.4 kB
  • After minification 38.4 kB
  • After compression 9.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 20.0 kB

  • Original 253.0 kB
  • After minification 233.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vizes Fal images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 367.4 kB

  • Original 528.8 kB
  • After minification 520.8 kB
  • After compression 161.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 367.4 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 238.5 kB

  • Original 289.6 kB
  • After minification 279.6 kB
  • After compression 51.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vizesfal.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 238.5 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (71%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

16

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vizes Fal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

vizesfal.net

vizesfal.net

437 ms

style.css

style.css

349 ms

Verdana.css

Verdana.css

349 ms

style.css

style.css

347 ms

Navigator.css

Navigator.css

351 ms

pathway.css

pathway.css

350 ms

ui.all.css

ui.all.css

349 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

664 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

774 ms

rvsheadpage.js

rvsheadpage.js

564 ms

jquery.url.js

jquery.url.js

562 ms

ddsmoothmenu.css

ddsmoothmenu.css

563 ms

ddsmoothmenu-v.css

ddsmoothmenu-v.css

564 ms

rvscustomopenwindow.js

rvscustomopenwindow.js

771 ms

form.js

form.js

777 ms

ui.base.css

ui.base.css

427 ms

ui.theme.css

ui.theme.css

430 ms

ui.core.css

ui.core.css

106 ms

ui.resizable.css

ui.resizable.css

210 ms

ui.accordion.css

ui.accordion.css

211 ms

ui.dialog.css

ui.dialog.css

212 ms

ui.slider.css

ui.slider.css

212 ms

ui.tabs.css

ui.tabs.css

212 ms

ui.datepicker.css

ui.datepicker.css

314 ms

ui.progressbar.css

ui.progressbar.css

418 ms

bgindex.jpg

bgindex.jpg

311 ms

img_01.jpg

img_01.jpg

358 ms

nF0xfYuxa3M

nF0xfYuxa3M

88 ms

img_02.jpg

img_02.jpg

473 ms

img_03.jpg

img_03.jpg

500 ms

img_11.jpg

img_11.jpg

661 ms

img_04.jpg

img_04.jpg

708 ms

img_05.jpg

img_05.jpg

759 ms

ex_l.jpg

ex_l.jpg

367 ms

line.jpg

line.jpg

453 ms

bgtop02.jpg

bgtop02.jpg

575 ms

white_3d.gif

white_3d.gif

574 ms

bgtop.jpg

bgtop.jpg

574 ms

index_04.jpg

index_04.jpg

1001 ms

tooltip_arrow.gif

tooltip_arrow.gif

806 ms

cm-logo-blue.gif

cm-logo-blue.gif

2057 ms

img_06.jpg

img_06.jpg

922 ms

img_07.jpg

img_07.jpg

1024 ms

img_08.jpg

img_08.jpg

1101 ms

spacer.gif

spacer.gif

1129 ms

img_10.jpg

img_10.jpg

1234 ms

szerencses1.jpg

szerencses1.jpg

940 ms

image009.jpg

image009.jpg

994 ms

image015.jpg

image015.jpg

1029 ms

aquapol_csapat.jpg

aquapol_csapat.jpg

1233 ms

ex_r.jpg

ex_r.jpg

1045 ms

bgbottom01.jpg

bgbottom01.jpg

1338 ms

bgbottom02.jpg

bgbottom02.jpg

1338 ms

www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css

www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css

27 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

55 ms

base.js

base.js

97 ms

Lrq7Jibxdtv2QOPyDSqncpDfQFNs3PE6SoUrUNh2GTU.js

Lrq7Jibxdtv2QOPyDSqncpDfQFNs3PE6SoUrUNh2GTU.js

49 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

56 ms

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

56 ms

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

59 ms

Accessibility Review

vizesfal.net accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

vizesfal.net best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

vizesfal.net SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    HU

  • Language Claimed

    HU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vizesfal.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Hungarian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vizesfal.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

vizesfal.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Vizes Fal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: