Tools & Wizards About Us
vlt.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 14

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    26% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

vlt.org

Vermont Land Trust - Protecting the Vermont You Love

Page Load Speed

4.2 sec in total

First Response

189 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

2.8 sec

vlt.org screenshot

About Website

Visit vlt.org now to see the best up-to-date Vlt content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about vlt.org

Vermont Land Trust unites land and lives for the benefit of people and the place we share. We protect farms, forests, and community places.

Visit vlt.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Vlt.org page load time and found that the first response time was 189 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

vlt.org performance score

14

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.9 s

34/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,390 ms

16/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.369

29/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.3 s

12/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

vlt.org

189 ms

vlt.org

358 ms

gtm.js

57 ms

js

148 ms

style.min.css

71 ms

Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Vlt.org, 92% (57 requests) were made to Ep23jn5pk2n.exactdn.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (372 ms) relates to the external source Ep23jn5pk2n.exactdn.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 324.0 kB (44%)

Content Size

743.8 kB

After Optimization

419.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Vlt.org main page is 743.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 347.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 267.5 kB

  • Original 297.5 kB
  • After minification 259.7 kB
  • After compression 30.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 37.8 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 267.5 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 98.4 kB
  • After minification 98.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vlt images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 56.5 kB

  • Original 347.9 kB
  • After minification 347.9 kB
  • After compression 291.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 56.5 kB or 16% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (82%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vlt. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

vlt.org

vlt.org

189 ms

vlt.org

vlt.org

358 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

57 ms

js

js

148 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

71 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

93 ms

leaflet.css

leaflet.css

102 ms

MarkerCluster.Default.css

MarkerCluster.Default.css

106 ms

MarkerCluster.css

MarkerCluster.css

88 ms

css2

css2

372 ms

style.css

style.css

77 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

128 ms

app.js

app.js

88 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

101 ms

sharer.min.js

sharer.min.js

101 ms

load-more.js

load-more.js

102 ms

basic.min.css

basic.min.css

72 ms

theme-ie11.min.css

theme-ie11.min.css

108 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

73 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

73 ms

api.js

api.js

66 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

134 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

75 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

133 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

136 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

97 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

149 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

134 ms

jquery.json.min.js

jquery.json.min.js

133 ms

gravityforms.min.js

gravityforms.min.js

157 ms

utils.min.js

utils.min.js

134 ms

vendor-theme.min.js

vendor-theme.min.js

164 ms

scripts-theme.min.js

scripts-theme.min.js

133 ms

frontend-legacy.min.js

frontend-legacy.min.js

165 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

158 ms

rough-edge-bottom.png

rough-edge-bottom.png

111 ms

bg-topo-map.png

bg-topo-map.png

112 ms

rough-edge-taupe-25.png

rough-edge-taupe-25.png

110 ms

source-sans-pro-cyrillic-ext-400-normal.woff

source-sans-pro-cyrillic-ext-400-normal.woff

9 ms

source-sans-pro-vietnamese-400-normal.woff

source-sans-pro-vietnamese-400-normal.woff

5 ms

source-sans-pro-latin-ext-400-normal.woff

source-sans-pro-latin-ext-400-normal.woff

7 ms

source-sans-pro-greek-ext-400-normal.woff

source-sans-pro-greek-ext-400-normal.woff

5 ms

source-sans-pro-cyrillic-400-normal.woff

source-sans-pro-cyrillic-400-normal.woff

7 ms

source-sans-pro-latin-400-normal.woff

source-sans-pro-latin-400-normal.woff

6 ms

source-sans-pro-greek-400-normal.woff

source-sans-pro-greek-400-normal.woff

8 ms

source-sans-pro-cyrillic-ext-300-normal.woff

source-sans-pro-cyrillic-ext-300-normal.woff

29 ms

source-sans-pro-vietnamese-300-normal.woff

source-sans-pro-vietnamese-300-normal.woff

30 ms

source-sans-pro-latin-ext-300-normal.woff

source-sans-pro-latin-ext-300-normal.woff

31 ms

source-sans-pro-greek-ext-300-normal.woff

source-sans-pro-greek-ext-300-normal.woff

27 ms

source-sans-pro-cyrillic-300-normal.woff

source-sans-pro-cyrillic-300-normal.woff

28 ms

source-sans-pro-latin-300-normal.woff

source-sans-pro-latin-300-normal.woff

27 ms

source-sans-pro-greek-300-normal.woff

source-sans-pro-greek-300-normal.woff

35 ms

source-sans-pro-cyrillic-ext-700-normal.woff

source-sans-pro-cyrillic-ext-700-normal.woff

32 ms

source-sans-pro-vietnamese-700-normal.woff

source-sans-pro-vietnamese-700-normal.woff

31 ms

source-sans-pro-latin-ext-700-normal.woff

source-sans-pro-latin-ext-700-normal.woff

30 ms

source-sans-pro-greek-ext-700-normal.woff

source-sans-pro-greek-ext-700-normal.woff

32 ms

source-sans-pro-cyrillic-700-normal.woff

source-sans-pro-cyrillic-700-normal.woff

31 ms

source-sans-pro-latin-700-normal.woff

source-sans-pro-latin-700-normal.woff

33 ms

source-sans-pro-greek-700-normal.woff

source-sans-pro-greek-700-normal.woff

32 ms

vlt.woff

vlt.woff

33 ms

topo-background.svg

topo-background.svg

45 ms

rough-edge-dark-brown.png

rough-edge-dark-brown.png

39 ms

Accessibility Review

vlt.org accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

vlt.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

vlt.org SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vlt.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vlt.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

vlt.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Vlt. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: