Tools & Wizards About Us
volx-ray.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    45% of other websites

  • 66

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

volx-ray.com

Volunteer X-ray | Volunteer X-ray

Page Load Speed

4.7 sec in total

First Response

163 ms

Resources Loaded

4.1 sec

Page Rendered

402 ms

volx-ray.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to volx-ray.com homepage info - get ready to check Volx Ray best content right away, or after learning these important things about volx-ray.com

Visit volx-ray.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Volx-ray.com page load time and found that the first response time was 163 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

volx-ray.com performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

8/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.1 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value460 ms

62/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.327

35/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.6 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.volx-ray.com

163 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

33 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

58 ms

wp_head.css

73 ms

default.css

75 ms

Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 37% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Volx-ray.com, 54% (36 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (304 ms) relates to the external source Google.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 278.1 kB (9%)

Content Size

2.9 MB

After Optimization

2.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Volx-ray.com main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 160.2 kB

  • Original 190.8 kB
  • After minification 188.2 kB
  • After compression 30.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 160.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 98.3 kB

  • Original 2.6 MB
  • After minification 2.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Volx Ray images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 17.5 kB

  • Original 135.9 kB
  • After minification 135.9 kB
  • After compression 118.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 17.5 kB or 13% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 2.2 kB

  • Original 15.0 kB
  • After minification 15.0 kB
  • After compression 12.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Volx-ray.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.2 kB or 15% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (62%)

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Volx Ray. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.volx-ray.com

www.volx-ray.com

163 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

33 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

58 ms

wp_head.css

wp_head.css

73 ms

default.css

default.css

75 ms

style.css

style.css

76 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

99 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

80 ms

js

js

68 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

78 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

88 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

168 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

142 ms

jquery.mobile.js

jquery.mobile.js

165 ms

common.js

common.js

166 ms

e-202444.js

e-202444.js

24 ms

wp_footer.js

wp_footer.js

165 ms

embed

embed

304 ms

et-divi-dynamic-tb-1070-tb-1064-43-late.css

et-divi-dynamic-tb-1070-tb-1064-43-late.css

32 ms

logo-for-website.png

logo-for-website.png

145 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1JlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1JlEw.woff

153 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1JlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1JlEA.ttf

157 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1JlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1JlEw.woff

186 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1JlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1JlEA.ttf

159 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1JlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1JlEw.woff

157 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1JlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1JlEA.ttf

185 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1JlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1JlEw.woff

184 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1JlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1JlEA.ttf

184 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1JlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1JlEw.woff

185 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1JlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1JlEA.ttf

183 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJnedA.woff

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJnedA.woff

218 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJnedw.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJnedw.ttf

219 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1JlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1JlEw.woff

217 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1JlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1JlEA.ttf

217 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1JlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1JlEw.woff

216 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1JlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1JlEA.ttf

215 ms

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTufntG.woff

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTufntG.woff

252 ms

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTufntF.ttf

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTufntF.ttf

252 ms

modules.woff

modules.woff

154 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmg1hVGdeI.woff

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmg1hVGdeI.woff

251 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmg1hVGdeL.ttf

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmg1hVGdeL.ttf

250 ms

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLufntG.woff

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLufntG.woff

250 ms

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLufntF.ttf

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLufntF.ttf

251 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm21lVGdeI.woff

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm21lVGdeI.woff

256 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm21lVGdeL.ttf

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm21lVGdeL.ttf

255 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmv1pVGdeI.woff

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmv1pVGdeI.woff

256 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmv1pVGdeL.ttf

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmv1pVGdeL.ttf

256 ms

pxiAyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmE0tMMPQ.woff

pxiAyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmE0tMMPQ.woff

254 ms

pxiAyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmE0tMMPc.ttf

pxiAyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmE0tMMPc.ttf

255 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmr19VGdeI.woff

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmr19VGdeI.woff

258 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmr19VGdeL.ttf

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmr19VGdeL.ttf

259 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmy15VGdeI.woff

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmy15VGdeI.woff

258 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmy15VGdeL.ttf

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmy15VGdeL.ttf

258 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm111VGdeI.woff

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm111VGdeI.woff

257 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm111VGdeL.ttf

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm111VGdeL.ttf

258 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm81xVGdeI.woff

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm81xVGdeI.woff

259 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm81xVGdeL.ttf

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm81xVGdeL.ttf

259 ms

volunteerexrayheader-min-scaled.jpg

volunteerexrayheader-min-scaled.jpg

227 ms

Depositphotos_39990293_xl-2015-scaled.jpg

Depositphotos_39990293_xl-2015-scaled.jpg

297 ms

Depositphotos_115507172_xl-2015.jpg

Depositphotos_115507172_xl-2015.jpg

158 ms

IMG_6463-scaled.jpg

IMG_6463-scaled.jpg

297 ms

Depositphotos_6619416_XL-min-scaled.jpg

Depositphotos_6619416_XL-min-scaled.jpg

289 ms

Depositphotos_10642890_xl-2015-scaled.jpg

Depositphotos_10642890_xl-2015-scaled.jpg

240 ms

Depositphotos_61365715_XL-min-scaled.jpg

Depositphotos_61365715_XL-min-scaled.jpg

298 ms

js

js

127 ms

geometry.js

geometry.js

16 ms

search.js

search.js

21 ms

Accessibility Review

volx-ray.com accessibility score

66

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

volx-ray.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

volx-ray.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Volx-ray.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Volx-ray.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

volx-ray.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Volx Ray. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: