Tools & Wizards About Us
voyageur50.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    41% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

voyageur50.com

Minnesota Voyageur 50 Mile Trail Ultramarathon – Carlton to Duluth, MN… and back.

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

117 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

252 ms

voyageur50.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to voyageur50.com homepage info - get ready to check Voyageur 50 best content right away, or after learning these important things about voyageur50.com

The Minnesota Voyageur 50 Mile Trail Ultramarathon is one of the oldest trail ultramarathons in the nation. The race follows a rugged, varied, out-and-back course that takes runners on a journey from ...

Visit voyageur50.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Voyageur50.com page load time and found that the first response time was 117 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

voyageur50.com performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

7/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.9 s

22/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,460 ms

14/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.052

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.6 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

voyageur50.com

117 ms

www.voyageur50.com

513 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

46 ms

style.min.css

138 ms

classic-themes.min.css

94 ms

Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Voyageur50.com, 13% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 11% (5 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (513 ms) belongs to the original domain Voyageur50.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 358.9 kB (26%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Voyageur50.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 668.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 34.5 kB

  • Original 44.2 kB
  • After minification 41.8 kB
  • After compression 9.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.5 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 32.0 kB

  • Original 668.6 kB
  • After minification 636.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Voyageur 50 images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-30%

Potential reduce by 121.5 kB

  • Original 411.2 kB
  • After minification 411.0 kB
  • After compression 289.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 121.5 kB or 30% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 170.8 kB

  • Original 244.2 kB
  • After minification 228.4 kB
  • After compression 73.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Voyageur50.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 170.8 kB or 70% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (70%)

Requests Now

33

After Optimization

10

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Voyageur 50. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

voyageur50.com

voyageur50.com

117 ms

www.voyageur50.com

www.voyageur50.com

513 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

46 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

138 ms

classic-themes.min.css

classic-themes.min.css

94 ms

styles.css

styles.css

89 ms

style.css

style.css

163 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

139 ms

css

css

34 ms

tablepress-combined.min.css

tablepress-combined.min.css

100 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

198 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

127 ms

index.js

index.js

140 ms

index.js

index.js

166 ms

script.js

script.js

168 ms

skip-link-focus-fix.js

skip-link-focus-fix.js

169 ms

api.js

api.js

40 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

179 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

219 ms

index.js

index.js

223 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

224 ms

logo_RRCA_sm.jpg

logo_RRCA_sm.jpg

109 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

44 ms

slider-jc-river.jpg

slider-jc-river.jpg

105 ms

voyageur-bridge.jpg

voyageur-bridge.jpg

114 ms

logo-magnolia-cafe.jpg

logo-magnolia-cafe.jpg

130 ms

logo_voyagur50-195x300.jpg

logo_voyagur50-195x300.jpg

105 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

41 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

102 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

102 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

250 ms

anchor

anchor

42 ms

logo_RRCA_sm.jpg

logo_RRCA_sm.jpg

211 ms

slider-jc-river.jpg

slider-jc-river.jpg

319 ms

voyageur-bridge.jpg

voyageur-bridge.jpg

238 ms

logo-magnolia-cafe.jpg

logo-magnolia-cafe.jpg

150 ms

styles__ltr.css

styles__ltr.css

10 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

20 ms

icon_facebook.png

icon_facebook.png

183 ms

9JZxEp0LhtaE1v0GxppxYD-mM4N48uB2QPjHabq_eOY.js

9JZxEp0LhtaE1v0GxppxYD-mM4N48uB2QPjHabq_eOY.js

77 ms

webworker.js

webworker.js

94 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

52 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

19 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

20 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

19 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

11 ms

Accessibility Review

voyageur50.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

voyageur50.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

voyageur50.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Voyageur50.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Voyageur50.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

voyageur50.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Voyageur 50. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: