3.4 sec in total
615 ms
2.2 sec
575 ms
Visit vrroofing.net now to see the best up-to-date V R Roofing content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about vrroofing.net
V&R Roofing provides the very best in commercial roofing systems for our neighbors in Tacoma, Washington and surrounding areas.
Visit vrroofing.netWe analyzed Vrroofing.net page load time and found that the first response time was 615 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
vrroofing.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.1 s
9/100
10%
Value8.8 s
1/100
25%
Value5.2 s
59/100
10%
Value110 ms
97/100
30%
Value0.209
59/100
15%
Value6.7 s
56/100
10%
615 ms
49 ms
56 ms
59 ms
41 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (66 requests) were addressed to the original Vrroofing.net, 10% (8 requests) were made to Vrroof38797.wwwssr4.supercp.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (615 ms) belongs to the original domain Vrroofing.net.
Page size can be reduced by 366.4 kB (28%)
1.3 MB
945.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Vrroofing.net main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 685.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 77.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 77.0 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 100.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, V R Roofing needs image optimization as it can save up to 100.1 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 106.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 106.4 kB or 30% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 83.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vrroofing.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 83.0 kB or 46% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 49 (68%)
72
23
The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of V R Roofing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 27 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
vrroofing.net
615 ms
rokbox.css
49 ms
s5_tab_show.css
56 ms
ce.css
59 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
41 ms
bootstrap.min.css
125 ms
bootstrap-responsive.min.css
81 ms
bootstrap-extended.css
59 ms
jquery.min.js
99 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
82 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
88 ms
caption.js
85 ms
mootools-core.js
164 ms
core.js
111 ms
mootools-more.js
186 ms
rokbox.js
162 ms
bootstrap.min.js
161 ms
jquery.ui.core.min.js
161 ms
jquery.ui.sortable.min.js
162 ms
jquery-ui-addons.js
185 ms
s5_tab_show.js
184 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
185 ms
jquery.colorbox.js
249 ms
s5box.css
251 ms
s5box-ie.css
251 ms
jd.gallery.jquery.js
252 ms
jd.gallery.transitions.jquery.js
254 ms
bootstrap-default-min.css
255 ms
bootstrap-responsive.css
263 ms
font-awesome.min.css
264 ms
ionicons.min.css
267 ms
css
30 ms
s5_flex_menu-min.js
267 ms
s5_flex_menu.css
265 ms
system.css
270 ms
general.css
270 ms
template.css
270 ms
css
45 ms
css
54 ms
editor.css
264 ms
thirdparty.css
231 ms
multibox.css
226 ms
ajax.css
226 ms
custom.css
253 ms
s5imagecontent.css
231 ms
overlay.js
230 ms
multibox.js
229 ms
scrollReveal-min.js
226 ms
securimage.min.js
228 ms
s5_box_hide_div.js
220 ms
index.php
362 ms
system.css
30 ms
sarnafil.png
55 ms
LogoVR4.png
58 ms
RX2HeaderComm1.jpg
128 ms
roofer-ladder.png
128 ms
show.php
130 ms
refresh.png
54 ms
slideup.png
57 ms
logovr.png
127 ms
GAFOnly.png
51 ms
polyglass.gif
51 ms
JManville.png
51 ms
Versico.png
51 ms
Durolast.png
51 ms
garlandlogo.jpg
51 ms
firestone_roofing.png
50 ms
font
12 ms
font
67 ms
commercial-highlight.jpg
71 ms
low-slopefpcomm.jpg
69 ms
s5_blue_bg.jpg
70 ms
lowslopefplower.jpg
71 ms
required_bg.gif
71 ms
ionicons.ttf
63 ms
RX2Header.jpg
35 ms
s5_scroll_arrow.png
156 ms
counter.js
24 ms
t.php
167 ms
index.php
375 ms
index.php
367 ms
index.php
397 ms
vrroofing.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
No form fields have multiple labels
Links do not have a discernible name
vrroofing.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
vrroofing.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vrroofing.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vrroofing.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
vrroofing.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of V R Roofing. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: