Tools & Wizards About Us
vrve.co screenshot

Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    62% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 44% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

vrve.co

Branding, web design, graphic design, marketing agency | VRVE

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

238 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

318 ms

vrve.co screenshot

About Website

Visit vrve.co now to see the best up-to-date VRVE content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about vrve.co

A full-service creative, branding, graphic design, web design & marketing agency helping to build your brand and grow your business.

Visit vrve.co

Key Findings

We analyzed Vrve.co page load time and found that the first response time was 238 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

vrve.co performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

38/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

39/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.1 s

45/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,100 ms

23/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.03

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.0 s

26/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

vrve.co

238 ms

vrve.co

342 ms

www.vrve.co

526 ms

styles.css

83 ms

aos.css

48 ms

Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Vrve.co, 12% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 11% (7 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (686 ms) belongs to the original domain Vrve.co.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 39.0 kB (3%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Vrve.co main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 849.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 26.1 kB

  • Original 31.3 kB
  • After minification 26.6 kB
  • After compression 5.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.8 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.1 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 5.2 kB

  • Original 849.7 kB
  • After minification 844.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. VRVE images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 227.8 kB
  • After minification 227.8 kB
  • After compression 226.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 6.2 kB

  • Original 38.7 kB
  • After minification 38.7 kB
  • After compression 32.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vrve.co needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.2 kB or 16% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (56%)

Requests Now

55

After Optimization

24

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of VRVE. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

vrve.co

vrve.co

238 ms

vrve.co

vrve.co

342 ms

www.vrve.co

www.vrve.co

526 ms

styles.css

styles.css

83 ms

aos.css

aos.css

48 ms

slick.min.css

slick.min.css

57 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

55 ms

aos.js

aos.js

62 ms

bodyScrollLock.min.js

bodyScrollLock.min.js

59 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

66 ms

js.cookie.min.js

js.cookie.min.js

70 ms

api.js

api.js

71 ms

global.js

global.js

339 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

56 ms

home_slider.js

home_slider.js

341 ms

zoho.js

zoho.js

361 ms

js

js

110 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

74 ms

css

css

66 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

143 ms

vrve_logo.png

vrve_logo.png

86 ms

branding_icon_brows.png

branding_icon_brows.png

152 ms

branding_icon.png

branding_icon.png

97 ms

design_icon.png

design_icon.png

97 ms

websites_icon.png

websites_icon.png

180 ms

marketing_icon.png

marketing_icon.png

178 ms

dark_grey.svg

dark_grey.svg

177 ms

mid_grey.svg

mid_grey.svg

219 ms

slide1.jpg

slide1.jpg

430 ms

slide2.jpg

slide2.jpg

431 ms

slide3.jpg

slide3.jpg

387 ms

slide4.jpg

slide4.jpg

480 ms

slide5.jpg

slide5.jpg

429 ms

slide6.jpg

slide6.jpg

457 ms

white.svg

white.svg

430 ms

light_grey.svg

light_grey.svg

488 ms

purple.svg

purple.svg

490 ms

blue.svg

blue.svg

492 ms

orange.svg

orange.svg

500 ms

green.svg

green.svg

531 ms

mid_grey.png

mid_grey.png

569 ms

thumbnail.jpg

thumbnail.jpg

568 ms

brandmark.png

brandmark.png

569 ms

thumbnail.jpg

thumbnail.jpg

571 ms

thumbnail.jpg

thumbnail.jpg

579 ms

thumbnail.jpg

thumbnail.jpg

686 ms

thumbnail.jpg

thumbnail.jpg

644 ms

thumbnail.jpg

thumbnail.jpg

645 ms

thumbnail.jpg

thumbnail.jpg

645 ms

thumbnail.jpg

thumbnail.jpg

648 ms

thumbnail.jpg

thumbnail.jpg

657 ms

6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkP8o58a-xw.ttf

6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkP8o58a-xw.ttf

22 ms

6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkM0o58a-xw.ttf

6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkM0o58a-xw.ttf

35 ms

6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkCEv58a-xw.ttf

6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkCEv58a-xw.ttf

57 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjo0oSmb2Rm.ttf

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjo0oSmb2Rm.ttf

71 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojISmb2Rm.ttf

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojISmb2Rm.ttf

72 ms

anchor

anchor

39 ms

styles__ltr.css

styles__ltr.css

6 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

14 ms

nDZsj75If3nFIOwINykT8DHqBp5SP1lvCURrWBBlnFc.js

nDZsj75If3nFIOwINykT8DHqBp5SP1lvCURrWBBlnFc.js

30 ms

webworker.js

webworker.js

33 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

19 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

45 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

6 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

10 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

6 ms

Accessibility Review

vrve.co accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

vrve.co best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

vrve.co SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vrve.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vrve.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

vrve.co

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of VRVE. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: