Tools & Wizards About Us
2013.wordrecoverytool.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 28

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    47% of other websites

  • 66

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

2013.wordrecoverytool.com

MS Word Recovery Tool to Recover & Repair Corrupt MS Word (Docx) Files

Page Load Speed

7.1 sec in total

First Response

175 ms

Resources Loaded

6.5 sec

Page Rendered

424 ms

2013.wordrecoverytool.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to 2013.wordrecoverytool.com homepage info - get ready to check 2013 Word Recovery Tool best content right away, or after learning these important things about 2013.wordrecoverytool.com

Word recovery tool to recover damaged DOCX files quickly. Word document recovery easily repair corrupted Word file from Microsoft Word 2007, 2010, 2013, 2016, & 2019.

Visit 2013.wordrecoverytool.com

Key Findings

We analyzed 2013.wordrecoverytool.com page load time and found that the first response time was 175 ms and then it took 6.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

2013.wordrecoverytool.com performance score

28

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

32/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

33/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.6 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,760 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.048

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.2 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

2013.wordrecoverytool.com

175 ms

www.wordrecoverytool.com

321 ms

www.wordrecoverytool.com

486 ms

bootstrap.min.css

166 ms

fontello.css

171 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original 2013.wordrecoverytool.com, 62% (37 requests) were made to Wordrecoverytool.com and 10% (6 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.3 sec) relates to the external source Wordrecoverytool.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 189.1 kB (11%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of 2013.wordrecoverytool.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 48.2 kB

  • Original 58.3 kB
  • After minification 43.2 kB
  • After compression 10.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 15.2 kB, which is 26% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 110.6 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 930.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, 2013 Word Recovery Tool needs image optimization as it can save up to 110.6 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 19.7 kB

  • Original 450.7 kB
  • After minification 450.7 kB
  • After compression 431.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 10.6 kB

  • Original 98.4 kB
  • After minification 98.4 kB
  • After compression 87.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 2013.wordrecoverytool.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.6 kB or 11% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (45%)

Requests Now

51

After Optimization

28

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 2013 Word Recovery Tool. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

2013.wordrecoverytool.com

2013.wordrecoverytool.com

175 ms

www.wordrecoverytool.com

www.wordrecoverytool.com

321 ms

www.wordrecoverytool.com

www.wordrecoverytool.com

486 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

166 ms

fontello.css

fontello.css

171 ms

style.css

style.css

182 ms

css-stars.css

css-stars.css

192 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

184 ms

owl.theme.css

owl.theme.css

183 ms

js

js

73 ms

api.js

api.js

40 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

233 ms

examples.js

examples.js

233 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

366 ms

jquery.barrating.js

jquery.barrating.js

244 ms

ajax-send-email.js

ajax-send-email.js

243 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

366 ms

custom.js

custom.js

364 ms

typewriter.js

typewriter.js

365 ms

LEhKH9Vznag

LEhKH9Vznag

218 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

25 ms

logo1.png

logo1.png

212 ms

slider.png

slider.png

212 ms

softpedia.png

softpedia.png

283 ms

software-suggest.png

software-suggest.png

213 ms

freedownloadmanager.png

freedownloadmanager.png

212 ms

recovery-wizard.png

recovery-wizard.png

213 ms

preview-word.png

preview-word.png

214 ms

3-recovery-modes.png

3-recovery-modes.png

308 ms

doc-file-formatting.png

doc-file-formatting.png

309 ms

auto-detect.png

auto-detect.png

281 ms

save.png

save.png

280 ms

1.png

1.png

580 ms

12.png

12.png

583 ms

18.png

18.png

618 ms

22.png

22.png

584 ms

error.jpg

error.jpg

581 ms

e1.PNG

e1.PNG

5324 ms

e2.PNG

e2.PNG

3225 ms

e3.PNG

e3.PNG

616 ms

e4.PNG

e4.PNG

667 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

12 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

74 ms

base.js

base.js

104 ms

fontello.woff

fontello.woff

402 ms

fallback

fallback

304 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

197 ms

jDVVIT4ZwDHfBiET8TcWj790JrYgF6qU1g_sOcBWI_w.js

jDVVIT4ZwDHfBiET8TcWj790JrYgF6qU1g_sOcBWI_w.js

130 ms

embed.js

embed.js

79 ms

fallback__ltr.css

fallback__ltr.css

36 ms

css

css

159 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

148 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

150 ms

id

id

24 ms

Create

Create

152 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

12 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

5 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

12 ms

GenerateIT

GenerateIT

19 ms

log_event

log_event

17 ms

Accessibility Review

2013.wordrecoverytool.com accessibility score

66

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[role]s are not contained by their required parent element

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

2013.wordrecoverytool.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

2013.wordrecoverytool.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 2013.wordrecoverytool.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that 2013.wordrecoverytool.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

2013.wordrecoverytool.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of 2013 Word Recovery Tool. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: