Tools & Wizards About Us
2015namle.wordpress.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 38

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    57% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

2015namle.wordpress.com

2015 NAMLE Conference | Celebrating Connectivity Across Cultures

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

8 ms

Resources Loaded

1 sec

Page Rendered

808 ms

2015namle.wordpress.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing 2015 NAMLE Wordpress content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about 2015namle.wordpress.com

Thank you all for an amazing conference! The NAMLE Conference and Global MIL Week Conference have concluded, and we are left with memories of inspiring speakers and wonderful new friends. We'll b...

Visit 2015namle.wordpress.com

Key Findings

We analyzed 2015namle.wordpress.com page load time and found that the first response time was 8 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

2015namle.wordpress.com performance score

38

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

41/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

13/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.0 s

46/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value400 ms

68/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.372

28/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.0 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

2015namle.wordpress.com

8 ms

2015namle.wordpress.com

219 ms

style.css

181 ms

184 ms

185 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original 2015namle.wordpress.com, 29% (14 requests) were made to 2015namle.files.wordpress.com and 17% (8 requests) were made to S1.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (513 ms) relates to the external source 2015namle.files.wordpress.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 62.4 kB (1%)

Content Size

5.5 MB

After Optimization

5.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of 2015namle.wordpress.com main page is 5.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 59.0 kB

  • Original 77.7 kB
  • After minification 75.1 kB
  • After compression 18.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 59.0 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2.3 kB

  • Original 5.3 MB
  • After minification 5.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 2015 NAMLE Wordpress images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 690 B

  • Original 74.5 kB
  • After minification 74.5 kB
  • After compression 73.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 441 B

  • Original 59.5 kB
  • After minification 59.5 kB
  • After compression 59.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 2015namle.wordpress.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (49%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

21

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 2015 NAMLE Wordpress. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

2015namle.wordpress.com

2015namle.wordpress.com

8 ms

2015namle.wordpress.com

2015namle.wordpress.com

219 ms

style.css

style.css

181 ms

184 ms

185 ms

198 ms

block-editor.css

block-editor.css

202 ms

185 ms

197 ms

css

css

218 ms

css

css

235 ms

css

css

218 ms

style-wpcom.css

style-wpcom.css

195 ms

194 ms

197 ms

hovercards.min.js

hovercards.min.js

197 ms

wpgroho.js

wpgroho.js

194 ms

196 ms

194 ms

w.js

w.js

196 ms

bilmur.min.js

bilmur.min.js

99 ms

global-print.css

global-print.css

15 ms

unesco-unaoc-transparent-logos-small2-e1431026025612.png

unesco-unaoc-transparent-logos-small2-e1431026025612.png

133 ms

45eb9429c2d8ab97af206339e8b48f243c276754890c787bab5b8883a74e04c1

45eb9429c2d8ab97af206339e8b48f243c276754890c787bab5b8883a74e04c1

167 ms

namleconflogorounded-logo-nostroke.png

namleconflogorounded-logo-nostroke.png

178 ms

cropped-namleconf-header-image2.jpg

cropped-namleconf-header-image2.jpg

146 ms

namleconf-theme-logocolorc692white.png

namleconf-theme-logocolorc692white.png

195 ms

img_0661.jpg

img_0661.jpg

169 ms

img_01381.jpg

img_01381.jpg

215 ms

9284867260_db878d3c3b_z.jpg

9284867260_db878d3c3b_z.jpg

195 ms

img_0588.jpg

img_0588.jpg

350 ms

westin.jpg

westin.jpg

283 ms

namle-poscardcoverformichelle1.jpg

namle-poscardcoverformichelle1.jpg

344 ms

milid2.jpg

milid2.jpg

269 ms

pic3.jpg

pic3.jpg

324 ms

img_0171.jpeg

img_0171.jpeg

284 ms

upperrightunescogapmil1.png

upperrightunescogapmil1.png

513 ms

o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyD9A-9U6Vc.ttf

o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyD9A-9U6Vc.ttf

108 ms

o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyAaBO9U6Vc.ttf

o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyAaBO9U6Vc.ttf

127 ms

Genericons.svg

Genericons.svg

44 ms

8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=

8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=

11 ms

ga6iaw1J5X9T9RW6j9bNVls-hfgvz8JcMofYTa32J4wsL2JAlAhZqFCTyccP.ttf

ga6iaw1J5X9T9RW6j9bNVls-hfgvz8JcMofYTa32J4wsL2JAlAhZqFCTyccP.ttf

115 ms

ga6iaw1J5X9T9RW6j9bNVls-hfgvz8JcMofYTa32J4wsL2JAlAhZT1eTyccP.ttf

ga6iaw1J5X9T9RW6j9bNVls-hfgvz8JcMofYTa32J4wsL2JAlAhZT1eTyccP.ttf

125 ms

g.gif

g.gif

109 ms

g.gif

g.gif

105 ms

g.gif

g.gif

105 ms

actionbar.css

actionbar.css

2 ms

actionbar.js

actionbar.js

13 ms

Accessibility Review

2015namle.wordpress.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

2015namle.wordpress.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

2015namle.wordpress.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 2015namle.wordpress.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that 2015namle.wordpress.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

2015namle.wordpress.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of 2015 NAMLE Wordpress. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: