Tools & Wizards About Us
260erickson.wordpress.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

260erickson.wordpress.com

Arthur Erickson: A Brief History | An Arch260 History Project

Page Load Speed

595 ms in total

First Response

9 ms

Resources Loaded

493 ms

Page Rendered

93 ms

260erickson.wordpress.com screenshot

About Website

Visit 260erickson.wordpress.com now to see the best up-to-date 260 Erickson Wordpress content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about 260erickson.wordpress.com

“Architecture, as I see it, is the art of composing spaces in response to existing environmental and urbanistic conditions to answer a client’s needs. In this way the building becomes the resolution b...

Visit 260erickson.wordpress.com

Key Findings

We analyzed 260erickson.wordpress.com page load time and found that the first response time was 9 ms and then it took 586 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

260erickson.wordpress.com performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

59/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

58/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.2 s

92/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,190 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.077

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.0 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

260erickson.wordpress.com

9 ms

260erickson.wordpress.com

206 ms

style.css

105 ms

116 ms

116 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original 260erickson.wordpress.com, 19% (6 requests) were made to S2.wp.com and 19% (6 requests) were made to S1.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (206 ms) belongs to the original domain 260erickson.wordpress.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 60.6 kB (21%)

Content Size

289.0 kB

After Optimization

228.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of 260erickson.wordpress.com main page is 289.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 112.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 59.9 kB

  • Original 82.4 kB
  • After minification 80.2 kB
  • After compression 22.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 59.9 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 47.2 kB
  • After minification 47.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 260 Erickson Wordpress images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 363 B

  • Original 112.0 kB
  • After minification 112.0 kB
  • After compression 111.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 413 B

  • Original 47.4 kB
  • After minification 47.4 kB
  • After compression 47.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 260erickson.wordpress.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (62%)

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 260 Erickson Wordpress. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

260erickson.wordpress.com

260erickson.wordpress.com

9 ms

260erickson.wordpress.com

260erickson.wordpress.com

206 ms

style.css

style.css

105 ms

116 ms

116 ms

102 ms

120 ms

108 ms

verbum-comments.css

verbum-comments.css

107 ms

block-editor.css

block-editor.css

121 ms

114 ms

global.css

global.css

101 ms

109 ms

hovercards.min.js

hovercards.min.js

117 ms

wpgroho.js

wpgroho.js

108 ms

106 ms

smart.js

smart.js

159 ms

117 ms

w.js

w.js

119 ms

conf

conf

102 ms

ga.js

ga.js

53 ms

erickson-header-photo.jpg

erickson-header-photo.jpg

100 ms

wpcom-gray-white.png

wpcom-gray-white.png

6 ms

erickson-portrait-with-image.jpg

erickson-portrait-with-image.jpg

105 ms

g.gif

g.gif

67 ms

67 ms

g.gif

g.gif

64 ms

g.gif

g.gif

65 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

14 ms

wordpress.png

wordpress.png

2 ms

ata.js

ata.js

40 ms

Accessibility Review

260erickson.wordpress.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

260erickson.wordpress.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

260erickson.wordpress.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 260erickson.wordpress.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that 260erickson.wordpress.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

260erickson.wordpress.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of 260 Erickson Wordpress. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: