3.1 sec in total
84 ms
2.3 sec
677 ms
Visit blog.waxmarketing.com now to see the best up-to-date Blog Waxmarketing content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about blog.waxmarketing.com
Even for the biggest brands, launching a new video game can be a significant challenge. In a market where any game competes against thousands of other titles, many with long life cycles, it’s tough to...
Visit blog.waxmarketing.comWe analyzed Blog.waxmarketing.com page load time and found that the first response time was 84 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
blog.waxmarketing.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.9 s
0/100
10%
Value8.8 s
1/100
25%
Value11.6 s
5/100
10%
Value310 ms
77/100
30%
Value0.033
100/100
15%
Value14.3 s
9/100
10%
84 ms
847 ms
22 ms
93 ms
128 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Blog.waxmarketing.com, 57% (47 requests) were made to Waxmarketing.com and 16% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (847 ms) relates to the external source Waxmarketing.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (66%)
1.8 MB
621.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Blog.waxmarketing.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 835.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 78.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 78.2 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Blog Waxmarketing images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 566.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 566.9 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 546.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Blog.waxmarketing.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 546.0 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (73%)
66
18
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Blog Waxmarketing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
blog.waxmarketing.com
84 ms
847 ms
webfont.js
22 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
93 ms
dashicons.min.css
128 ms
jquery-ui-dialog.min.css
98 ms
settings.css
99 ms
style.css
92 ms
layout.css
141 ms
main.css
176 ms
shortcodes.css
183 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
145 ms
prettyPhoto.css
164 ms
responsive.css
190 ms
instag-slider.css
192 ms
addtoany.min.css
200 ms
jquery.js
249 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
211 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
334 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
258 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
236 ms
css
32 ms
icons.css
242 ms
style.css
188 ms
newbadge
306 ms
core.min.js
110 ms
widget.min.js
111 ms
mouse.min.js
126 ms
resizable.min.js
126 ms
draggable.min.js
126 ms
button.min.js
126 ms
position.min.js
126 ms
dialog.min.js
175 ms
wpdialog.min.js
178 ms
abram-brad-love.js
178 ms
wp-embed.min.js
181 ms
modernizr.js
180 ms
fitvids.min.js
181 ms
prettyPhoto.js
181 ms
abram_brad_plugins.js
274 ms
skrollr.js
182 ms
imagesloaded.js
182 ms
jquery.scrollTo.min.js
224 ms
waypoints.min.js
273 ms
bxslider.min.js
231 ms
abram_brad_main.min.js
235 ms
d-QWLnp4didxos_6urzFtg.woff
150 ms
grlryt2bdKIyfMSOhzd1eA.woff
374 ms
7KXg6nyyqN8gyMoNwQ7aOQ.woff
384 ms
vxNK-E6B13CyehuDCmvQvw.woff
383 ms
biUEjW7P-lfzIZFXrcy-wQ.woff
379 ms
owYYXKukxFDFjr0ZO8NXhz8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
382 ms
l1cOQ90roY9yC7voEhngDD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
372 ms
PyqsDANUgLi2UsdO-d4iZQ.woff
377 ms
dI-qzxlKVQA6TUC5RKSb3z8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
375 ms
ZCcPJiCGOzh84o2siPk48dIh4imgI8P11RFo6YPCPC0.woff
381 ms
5xAt7XK2vkUdjhGtt98unSiURDTH4ZeuJyFQH0IObys.woff
381 ms
atrk.js
133 ms
7GqClqvlObY
348 ms
ir
103 ms
alltop_170x30.jpg
345 ms
ir
101 ms
wax-marketing.png
328 ms
wax-marketing_w.png
328 ms
Depositphotos_39072457_s-2015.jpg
347 ms
Depositphotos_39072457_s-2015-80x80.jpg
336 ms
icomoon.ttf
298 ms
p-ESaZVhGGkh0T-.gif
46 ms
b250x250.jpg
280 ms
page.js
35 ms
41CrEizPmNL._SL250_.jpg
231 ms
5188pGBXG4L._SL250_.jpg
229 ms
atrk.gif
429 ms
7GqClqvlObY
100 ms
test.png
55 ms
www-embed-player-vflQrT_sR.css
44 ms
www-embed-player.js
62 ms
base.js
98 ms
yrK4EqpSRdoujKQmsJoZ5WaLgeULvcWnibQMQSxOOnM.js
50 ms
ad_status.js
91 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
107 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
118 ms
blog.waxmarketing.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
blog.waxmarketing.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
blog.waxmarketing.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Blog.waxmarketing.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Blog.waxmarketing.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
blog.waxmarketing.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Blog Waxmarketing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: