Report Summary

  • 2

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    20% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

ces.whirlpool.com

Home, Kitchen & Laundry Appliances & Products | Whirlpool

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

38 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

653 ms

ces.whirlpool.com screenshot

About Website

Visit ces.whirlpool.com now to see the best up-to-date Ces Whirlpool content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ces.whirlpool.com

Choose Whirlpool products and home appliances and trust they’ll handle your family’s chores with care. Find the right Whirlpool® Appliance to manage your needs.

Visit ces.whirlpool.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ces.whirlpool.com page load time and found that the first response time was 38 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ces.whirlpool.com performance score

2

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

7/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value28.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value24.4 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10,750 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.705

7/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value48.0 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ces.whirlpool.com

38 ms

www.whirlpool.com

593 ms

ruxitagentjs_ICA7NQVfghqrux_10289240325103055.js

41 ms

OtAutoBlock.js

61 ms

otSDKStub.js

69 ms

Our browser made a total of 112 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Ces.whirlpool.com, 79% (88 requests) were made to Whirlpool.com and 4% (5 requests) were made to Fast.fonts.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (940 ms) relates to the external source Whirlpool.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.5 MB (20%)

Content Size

12.1 MB

After Optimization

9.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Ces.whirlpool.com main page is 12.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 9.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 598.9 kB

  • Original 714.6 kB
  • After minification 572.6 kB
  • After compression 115.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 142.0 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 598.9 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 934.8 kB

  • Original 9.5 MB
  • After minification 8.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ces Whirlpool images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 245.4 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB
  • After compression 780.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 245.4 kB or 24% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 675.0 kB

  • Original 851.4 kB
  • After minification 843.8 kB
  • After compression 176.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ces.whirlpool.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 675.0 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (40%)

Requests Now

106

After Optimization

64

The browser has sent 106 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ces Whirlpool. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

ces.whirlpool.com accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

ces.whirlpool.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

ces.whirlpool.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ces.whirlpool.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ces.whirlpool.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ces Whirlpool. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: