Tools & Wizards About Us
clients.wrldevelopment.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 6

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    21% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

clients.wrldevelopment.com

WRLD.Host | Managed Web Hosting & Domains by WRLD Tech Co. - WRLD Tech Co.

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

127 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

153 ms

clients.wrldevelopment.com screenshot

About Website

Visit clients.wrldevelopment.com now to see the best up-to-date Clients WRLD Evelopment content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about clients.wrldevelopment.com

WRLD.Host Client and Partner Centralized Web Hosting, Managed WordPress, Domains, DNS, and More | A Service by WRLD Inc. (WRLD Tech Co.)

Visit clients.wrldevelopment.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Clients.wrldevelopment.com page load time and found that the first response time was 127 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

clients.wrldevelopment.com performance score

6

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

7/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.5 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.2 s

13/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,890 ms

9/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.885

3/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.0 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

clients.wrldevelopment.com

127 ms

wrld.host

599 ms

F1paFwm3PwP4T2NRD8_3X_fXf6E.js

611 ms

minified.css

65 ms

theme.css

85 ms

Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Clients.wrldevelopment.com, 50% (18 requests) were made to Wrld.host and 6% (2 requests) were made to Clarity.ms. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (664 ms) relates to the external source Wrld.host.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 288.5 kB (28%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

732.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Clients.wrldevelopment.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 462.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 278.4 kB

  • Original 377.8 kB
  • After minification 316.2 kB
  • After compression 99.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 61.6 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 278.4 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 16.5 kB
  • After minification 16.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Clients WRLD Evelopment images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 7.5 kB

  • Original 462.3 kB
  • After minification 462.3 kB
  • After compression 454.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 2.6 kB

  • Original 164.3 kB
  • After minification 164.3 kB
  • After compression 161.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Clients.wrldevelopment.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (87%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

4

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Clients WRLD Evelopment. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

clients.wrldevelopment.com

clients.wrldevelopment.com

127 ms

wrld.host

wrld.host

599 ms

F1paFwm3PwP4T2NRD8_3X_fXf6E.js

F1paFwm3PwP4T2NRD8_3X_fXf6E.js

611 ms

minified.css

minified.css

65 ms

theme.css

theme.css

85 ms

site.css

site.css

68 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

53 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

35 ms

js

js

76 ms

fontawesome-all.min.css

fontawesome-all.min.css

114 ms

vendor.js

vendor.js

62 ms

lagom-app.js

lagom-app.js

73 ms

whmcs-custom.min.js

whmcs-custom.min.js

68 ms

v84a3a4012de94ce1a686ba8c167c359c1696973893317

v84a3a4012de94ce1a686ba8c167c359c1696973893317

50 ms

Emm-cf9L0NL_epbhYbStGfVafEY.js

Emm-cf9L0NL_epbhYbStGfVafEY.js

488 ms

css

css

50 ms

logo_big.1381151181.png

logo_big.1381151181.png

62 ms

lagom-medium-icons.woff

lagom-medium-icons.woff

419 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

664 ms

fa-light-300.woff

fa-light-300.woff

377 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

254 ms

main.js

main.js

8 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

50 ms

4824142.js

4824142.js

107 ms

3xxzijhoru

3xxzijhoru

105 ms

index.js

index.js

81 ms

index.js

index.js

98 ms

4824142.js

4824142.js

140 ms

fb.js

fb.js

66 ms

leadflows.js

leadflows.js

120 ms

banner.js

banner.js

151 ms

conversations-embed.js

conversations-embed.js

71 ms

web-interactives-embed.js

web-interactives-embed.js

74 ms

collectedforms.js

collectedforms.js

74 ms

clarity.js

clarity.js

42 ms

c.gif

c.gif

7 ms

Accessibility Review

clients.wrldevelopment.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

clients.wrldevelopment.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

clients.wrldevelopment.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Clients.wrldevelopment.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Clients.wrldevelopment.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

clients.wrldevelopment.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Clients WRLD Evelopment. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: