Tools & Wizards About Us
content.webascender.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

content.webascender.com

Michigan Web Design Company & Digital Marketing Agency

Page Load Speed

9 sec in total

First Response

8 ms

Resources Loaded

7.9 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

content.webascender.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Content Web Ascender content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about content.webascender.com

Web Ascender is the talent, diversity, and dedication you need, without the payroll. We function as an extension of your team in all things digital.

Visit content.webascender.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Content.webascender.com page load time and found that the first response time was 8 ms and then it took 9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

content.webascender.com performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.7 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value20.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value24.3 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value22,720 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.012

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value34.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

webascender.com

8 ms

www.webascender.com

138 ms

vc_style.css

89 ms

style.min.css

128 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

148 ms

Our browser made a total of 108 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Content.webascender.com, 6% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5 sec) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 112.4 kB (13%)

Content Size

871.4 kB

After Optimization

759.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Content.webascender.com main page is 871.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 714.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 111.3 kB

  • Original 133.2 kB
  • After minification 126.0 kB
  • After compression 21.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 111.3 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.0 kB

  • Original 714.7 kB
  • After minification 713.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Content Web Ascender images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 50 B

  • Original 23.5 kB
  • After minification 23.5 kB
  • After compression 23.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 73 (78%)

Requests Now

93

After Optimization

20

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 93 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Content Web Ascender. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 47 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 28 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

webascender.com

webascender.com

8 ms

www.webascender.com

www.webascender.com

138 ms

vc_style.css

vc_style.css

89 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

128 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

148 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

147 ms

css

css

156 ms

boast-display-public.css

boast-display-public.css

158 ms

page-list.css

page-list.css

155 ms

portfolio.css

portfolio.css

254 ms

style.css

style.css

179 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

220 ms

grid-system.css

grid-system.css

208 ms

style.css

style.css

331 ms

magnific.css

magnific.css

189 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

495 ms

style.css

style.css

458 ms

ascend.css

ascend.css

266 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

465 ms

formreset.min.css

formreset.min.css

317 ms

formsmain.min.css

formsmain.min.css

474 ms

readyclass.min.css

readyclass.min.css

485 ms

browsers.min.css

browsers.min.css

471 ms

salient-dynamic-styles.css

salient-dynamic-styles.css

496 ms

style.css

style.css

488 ms

rawline.css

rawline.css

517 ms

overwrites.css

overwrites.css

489 ms

popup.css

popup.css

490 ms

jetpack.css

jetpack.css

493 ms

boast-display-public.min.js

boast-display-public.min.js

491 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

525 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

513 ms

jquery.json.min.js

jquery.json.min.js

512 ms

gravityforms.min.js

gravityforms.min.js

514 ms

529469.js

529469.js

505 ms

imagesLoaded.min.js

imagesLoaded.min.js

507 ms

isotope.min.js

isotope.min.js

518 ms

salient-portfolio.js

salient-portfolio.js

517 ms

e-202239.js

e-202239.js

177 ms

salient-social.js

salient-social.js

511 ms

gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js

gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js

485 ms

jquery.easing.js

jquery.easing.js

450 ms

jquery.mousewheel.js

jquery.mousewheel.js

435 ms

priority.js

priority.js

431 ms

transit.js

transit.js

429 ms

waypoints.js

waypoints.js

427 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

390 ms

hoverintent.js

hoverintent.js

367 ms

magnific.js

magnific.js

350 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

344 ms

init.js

init.js

335 ms

touchswipe.min.js

touchswipe.min.js

281 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

157 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

140 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

127 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

115 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

113 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

103 ms

jquery.maskedinput.min.js

jquery.maskedinput.min.js

100 ms

site.js

site.js

99 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

96 ms

css

css

99 ms

vivus.min.js

vivus.min.js

94 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

83 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

575 ms

loading-white-bg.gif

loading-white-bg.gif

483 ms

rawline-700.woff

rawline-700.woff

400 ms

rawline-400.woff

rawline-400.woff

401 ms

u-490qaujRI2PbsvY_1ykgxu.ttf

u-490qaujRI2PbsvY_1ykgxu.ttf

4622 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCGPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCGPrQ.ttf

4640 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCGPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCGPrQ.ttf

4960 ms

fontawesome-webfont.svg

fontawesome-webfont.svg

2449 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

4641 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

4640 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

4644 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

4631 ms

linecons.ttf

linecons.ttf

4621 ms

steadysets.ttf

steadysets.ttf

4615 ms

icomoon.woff

icomoon.woff

4615 ms

www.webascender.com

www.webascender.com

2948 ms

optimize.js

optimize.js

2437 ms

conversion_async.js

conversion_async.js

2401 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

2300 ms

529469.js

529469.js

2500 ms

js

js

2056 ms

529469.js

529469.js

2256 ms

529469.js

529469.js

2294 ms

fb.js

fb.js

2242 ms

logo.png

logo.png

1393 ms

logo-mobile-transparent.png

logo-mobile-transparent.png

1397 ms

no-portfolio-item-small.jpg

no-portfolio-item-small.jpg

1708 ms

continuous-website-improvement.jpg

continuous-website-improvement.jpg

2159 ms

executive-inbound-guide-cover-1-394x263.jpg

executive-inbound-guide-cover-1-394x263.jpg

1698 ms

digital-marketing-ebooks-2-394x263.png

digital-marketing-ebooks-2-394x263.png

1698 ms

Is-SEO-worth-it-in-2022--394x263.png

Is-SEO-worth-it-in-2022--394x263.png

1709 ms

rsi-1-600x403.jpg

rsi-1-600x403.jpg

759 ms

homesite-large-600x403.jpg

homesite-large-600x403.jpg

760 ms

eqhs-large-600x403.jpg

eqhs-large-600x403.jpg

758 ms

SmartIce-1-600x403.jpg

SmartIce-1-600x403.jpg

773 ms

em-products-600x403.jpg

em-products-600x403.jpg

818 ms

Bridgestone-2-1-600x403.jpg

Bridgestone-2-1-600x403.jpg

819 ms

WA-video-frame1-1.jpg

WA-video-frame1-1.jpg

1000 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

699 ms

179170855947161

179170855947161

190 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

51 ms

124 ms

collect

collect

22 ms

51 ms

Accessibility Review

content.webascender.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

content.webascender.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

content.webascender.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Content.webascender.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Content.webascender.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

content.webascender.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Content Web Ascender. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: