Tools & Wizards About Us
ediabbas.wordpress.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 57

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    73% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 91% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

ediabbas.wordpress.com

من يرد الله به خيرا يفقه فى الدين | “Barangsiapa yang dikehendaki kebaikan oleh Allah, maka Allah akan memahamkan Agama-Nya” (HR Bukhari dan Muslim)

Page Load Speed

909 ms in total

First Response

8 ms

Resources Loaded

459 ms

Page Rendered

442 ms

ediabbas.wordpress.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to ediabbas.wordpress.com homepage info - get ready to check Ediabbas Wordpress best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about ediabbas.wordpress.com

“Barangsiapa yang dikehendaki kebaikan oleh Allah, maka Allah akan memahamkan Agama-Nya” (HR Bukhari dan Muslim)

Visit ediabbas.wordpress.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ediabbas.wordpress.com page load time and found that the first response time was 8 ms and then it took 901 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ediabbas.wordpress.com performance score

57

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

57/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

65/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.1 s

93/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value880 ms

32/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.5 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ediabbas.wordpress.com

8 ms

ediabbas.wordpress.com

176 ms

91 ms

style.css

91 ms

101 ms

Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Ediabbas.wordpress.com, 50% (17 requests) were made to S2.wp.com and 15% (5 requests) were made to S1.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (176 ms) belongs to the original domain Ediabbas.wordpress.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 61.6 kB (39%)

Content Size

157.0 kB

After Optimization

95.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ediabbas.wordpress.com main page is 157.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 85.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 60.9 kB

  • Original 85.8 kB
  • After minification 84.7 kB
  • After compression 24.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 60.9 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 230 B

  • Original 12.8 kB
  • After minification 12.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ediabbas Wordpress images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 259 B

  • Original 41.4 kB
  • After minification 41.4 kB
  • After compression 41.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 229 B

  • Original 17.0 kB
  • After minification 17.0 kB
  • After compression 16.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ediabbas.wordpress.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (72%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

9

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ediabbas Wordpress. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ediabbas.wordpress.com

ediabbas.wordpress.com

8 ms

ediabbas.wordpress.com

ediabbas.wordpress.com

176 ms

91 ms

style.css

style.css

91 ms

101 ms

95 ms

101 ms

102 ms

global.css

global.css

102 ms

106 ms

hovercards.min.js

hovercards.min.js

103 ms

wpgroho.js

wpgroho.js

99 ms

103 ms

w.js

w.js

124 ms

global-print.css

global-print.css

26 ms

conf

conf

167 ms

ga.js

ga.js

38 ms

bg-bottom.gif

bg-bottom.gif

24 ms

bg-top.gif

bg-top.gif

11 ms

search-box.gif

search-box.gif

21 ms

search-btn.gif

search-btn.gif

21 ms

nav-bg.gif

nav-bg.gif

11 ms

nav-divider.gif

nav-divider.gif

21 ms

nav-bg-hover-left.png

nav-bg-hover-left.png

69 ms

content-bg.gif

content-bg.gif

70 ms

date-tab.png

date-tab.png

70 ms

side-bg-bottom.png

side-bg-bottom.png

71 ms

side-bg-top.png

side-bg-top.png

71 ms

wpcom-gray-white.png

wpcom-gray-white.png

72 ms

g.gif

g.gif

76 ms

85 ms

g.gif

g.gif

74 ms

g.gif

g.gif

74 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

16 ms

Accessibility Review

ediabbas.wordpress.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

ediabbas.wordpress.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

ediabbas.wordpress.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ID

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ediabbas.wordpress.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Ediabbas.wordpress.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ediabbas.wordpress.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ediabbas Wordpress. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: