Report Summary

  • 68

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 62

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 50

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    18% of websites

james.westgard.com

The Westgard Rules

Page Load Speed

4.7 sec in total

First Response

750 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

1.6 sec

james.westgard.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to james.westgard.com homepage info - get ready to check James Westgard best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about james.westgard.com

Visit james.westgard.com

Key Findings

We analyzed James.westgard.com page load time and found that the first response time was 750 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

james.westgard.com performance score

68

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

24/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

51/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.6 s

53/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value170 ms

93/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.041

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.0 s

43/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

james.westgard.com

750 ms

styles.css

228 ms

flyouts-min.js

33 ms

recommend.js

141 ms

show_ads.js

25 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 10% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original James.westgard.com, 20% (10 requests) were made to Westgard.com and 14% (7 requests) were made to Static.typepad.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain James.westgard.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 560.5 kB (27%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

In fact, the total size of James.westgard.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 48.6 kB

  • Original 63.5 kB
  • After minification 57.9 kB
  • After compression 14.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.6 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 405.4 kB

  • Original 1.8 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, James Westgard needs image optimization as it can save up to 405.4 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-50%

Potential reduce by 59.7 kB

  • Original 120.5 kB
  • After minification 120.1 kB
  • After compression 60.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 59.7 kB or 50% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 46.8 kB

  • Original 56.7 kB
  • After minification 41.4 kB
  • After compression 9.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. James.westgard.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 46.8 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (36%)

Requests Now

47

After Optimization

30

The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of James Westgard. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

james.westgard.com accessibility score

62

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

james.westgard.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

james.westgard.com SEO score

50

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise James.westgard.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that James.westgard.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of James Westgard. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: