31.5 sec in total
8 ms
7.2 sec
24.3 sec
Click here to check amazing Jesse Kozlowski Wordpress content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about jessekozlowski.wordpress.com
My Surveying Observations, Measurements and Pictures - My YouTube Channel https://m.youtube.com/c/JesseKozlowski
Visit jessekozlowski.wordpress.comWe analyzed Jessekozlowski.wordpress.com page load time and found that the first response time was 8 ms and then it took 31.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
jessekozlowski.wordpress.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
26/100
10%
Value5.4 s
20/100
25%
Value5.0 s
64/100
10%
Value830 ms
35/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value18.4 s
3/100
10%
8 ms
629 ms
109 ms
109 ms
123 ms
Our browser made a total of 173 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Jessekozlowski.wordpress.com, 82% (141 requests) were made to Jessekozlowski.files.wordpress.com and 3% (6 requests) were made to S2.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.3 sec) relates to the external source Jessekozlowski.files.wordpress.com.
Page size can be reduced by 314.7 kB (10%)
3.2 MB
2.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Jessekozlowski.wordpress.com main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 313.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 313.7 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jesse Kozlowski Wordpress images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 873 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 143 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jessekozlowski.wordpress.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (11%)
167
148
The browser has sent 167 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jesse Kozlowski Wordpress. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
jessekozlowski.wordpress.com
8 ms
jessekozlowski.wordpress.com
629 ms
109 ms
109 ms
123 ms
116 ms
css
129 ms
116 ms
115 ms
global.css
115 ms
119 ms
hovercards.min.js
121 ms
wpgroho.js
115 ms
120 ms
smart.js
180 ms
121 ms
w.js
121 ms
conf
182 ms
importmap-polyfill.min.js
1 ms
ga.js
100 ms
new-jersey-triangulation-diagram-1976.jpg
238 ms
inset-281-hudson-river-new-york-to-haverstraw-feb.-1982.jpg
203 ms
inset-294-delaware-river-smyrna-river-to-wilmington-april-1962.jpg
250 ms
inset-295-delaware-river-wilmington-to-philadelphia-feb.-1970.jpg
205 ms
inset-296-delaware-river-philadelphia-to-trenton-june-1973.jpg
242 ms
inset-361-port-jefferson-and-mount-sinai-harbors-new-york-sept.-1962.jpg
240 ms
inset-369-new-york-harbor-march-1970.jpg
304 ms
inset-1213-long-island-sound-western-part-connecticut-new-york-june-1972.jpg
326 ms
inset-1215-approaches-to-ny-fire-island-light-to-sea-girt-light-ny-nj-may-1968.jpg
344 ms
inset-1216-sea-girt-to-little-egg-inlet-new-jersey-nov.-1974.jpg
300 ms
inset-1217-little-egg-inlet-to-hereford-inlet-new-jersey-nov.-1974.jpg
309 ms
inset-1218-delaware-bay-nj-de-nov.-1974.jpg
435 ms
map-12332-raritan-river-raritan-bay-to-new-brunswick-april-1982.jpg
407 ms
triangulation-network-of-the-us-plate-iv.jpg
436 ms
special-publication-no.-247-manual-of-geodetic-triangulation-1950.jpg
417 ms
zhannas-survey-station-ngs-historical-geodetic-control-diagrams.jpg
474 ms
plate-i.-plan-of-the-principal-triangles-in-england-wales-and-part-of-scotland.jpg
461 ms
ordnance-trigonometrical-survey-principal-triangulation-1858.jpg
545 ms
ramsdens-great-theodolite.jpg
506 ms
the-great-trigonometrical-survey-of-india.jpg
548 ms
mount-everest-elevation.jpg
599 ms
the-transcontinental-triangulation-and-the-american-arc-of-the-parallel-usc-gs-special-publication-no.-4-1900.jpg
591 ms
an-example-of-horizontal-geodetic-control-for-bridge-engineering-and-planning.jpg
590 ms
louisiana-triangulation-diagram.jpg
631 ms
new-orleans-to-calcasieu-river-east-section-1050.jpg
677 ms
baton_rouge_louisiana_nh_15_6.jpg
695 ms
mobile_alabama_mississippi_louisiana_nh_16_4.jpg
742 ms
new_orleans_louisiana_nh_15_9.jpg
743 ms
breton_sound_louisiana_nh_16_7.jpg
747 ms
lakes-pontchartrain-and-maurepas.jpg
737 ms
la_spanish-fort_335016_1891_62500_geo.jpg
765 ms
la_baton-rouge_335209_1961_250000_geo.jpg
842 ms
la_covington_334422_1935_62500_geo.jpg
822 ms
la_covington_334425_1950_62500_geo.jpg
926 ms
la_ponchatoula_335187_1983_100000_geo.jpg
892 ms
national-geodetic-survey-data-explorer.jpg
880 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVQUwaEQXjM.woff
154 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVQUwaEQXjM.woff
197 ms
g.gif
188 ms
223 ms
g.gif
186 ms
g.gif
186 ms
__utm.gif
61 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWV4exoMUdjFnmg.woff
54 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWV4exoMUdjFnmg.woff
61 ms
ata.js
99 ms
bj4239-designation-lake-station-no-2-1953.jpg
673 ms
bj4300-designation-lake-station-no-1-1953.jpg
777 ms
bj4226-designation-lake-station-no-3-1953.jpg
707 ms
bj4240-designation-lake-station-no-4-1953.jpg
731 ms
lp-triang.jpg
785 ms
highway-triang.jpg
745 ms
state-boundary.jpg
761 ms
basic.jpg
756 ms
fundamentals.jpg
780 ms
fl-spcs.jpg
816 ms
fdot-manual.jpg
734 ms
fdot-spcs-zones.jpg
721 ms
fl-manuals.jpg
765 ms
flsms.jpg
731 ms
screenshot_20200802-145217_drive5552602171158570479.jpg
769 ms
1-sokkia.jpg
720 ms
1-sokkia_p_167.jpg
769 ms
2-topcon_gts223.jpg
713 ms
2-topcon_gts223_p_13-1.jpg
700 ms
3-leica.jpg
719 ms
3-leica_p_148.jpg
712 ms
3-leica_p_155.jpg
697 ms
4-nikon.jpg
691 ms
4-nikon_p_115.jpg
720 ms
5-trimble_s7.jpg
636 ms
5-ta_calculations_p9.jpg
681 ms
5-ta_calculations_p11.jpg
632 ms
walter-za.jpg
666 ms
1-1.jpg
661 ms
1-mcdonald-observatory.jpg
653 ms
1-mcdonald-observatory-stations-1.jpg
716 ms
2.jpg
660 ms
2-rte-206-27-28.jpg
618 ms
2-rte-206-27-28-stations.jpg
594 ms
3.jpg
600 ms
3-clarks-edm-cbl.jpg
614 ms
3-clarks-edm-cbl-stations.jpg
620 ms
4.jpg
594 ms
4-l-shape-hainesport.jpg
574 ms
4-l-shape-hainesport-stations.jpg
592 ms
5.jpg
585 ms
5-l-shape-200-foot.jpg
547 ms
5-l-shape-200-foot-stations.jpg
565 ms
6.jpg
576 ms
6-folsom-cbl-s8.jpg
597 ms
6-folsom-cbl-s8-stations.jpg
583 ms
7.jpg
525 ms
7-union-lake.jpg
508 ms
7-union-lake-stations.jpg
638 ms
8.jpg
542 ms
8-cooper-river-lake.jpg
538 ms
8-cooper-river-lake-stations.jpg
522 ms
9-1.jpg
520 ms
9-rte-206-7-28-level-line-1.jpg
499 ms
9-2.jpg
536 ms
9-rte-206-7-28-level-line-2.jpg
549 ms
9-rte-206-7-28-level-line-1-stations.jpg
509 ms
9-3.jpg
514 ms
9-rte-206-7-28-level-line-3.jpg
534 ms
9-rte-206-7-28-level-line-3-stations.jpg
2531 ms
10.jpg
570 ms
10-40-75.jpg
2499 ms
10-40-75-stations.jpg
505 ms
11.jpg
509 ms
11-crows-woods.jpg
547 ms
11-crows-woods-stations.jpg
554 ms
12.jpg
524 ms
12-folsom-cbl-s7.jpg
568 ms
12-folsom-cbl-s7-stations.jpg
571 ms
13.jpg
2581 ms
13-rte-206-quater-mile-traverse.jpg
629 ms
13-rte-206-quater-mile-traverse-stations.jpg
607 ms
14.jpg
610 ms
14-folsom-cbl.jpg
685 ms
14-folsom-cbl-stations.jpg
644 ms
15.jpg
2634 ms
15-40-75.jpg
726 ms
15-40-75-stations.jpg
717 ms
16.jpg
738 ms
16-larry-scott.jpg
2747 ms
16a-larry-scott.jpg
807 ms
larry-scott-11-miles.jpg
893 ms
example.jpg
980 ms
ecef-llh.jpg
1059 ms
gps-edm-dont-match.jpg
1126 ms
ngs-edm.jpg
1249 ms
p-26.jpg
1312 ms
p-27.jpg
1387 ms
14-23_1857-mt.everest-map-from-jasb.jpg
2072 ms
14-23_1857-mt.everest-map-from-jasb_closeup.jpg
2141 ms
14-20_diviation-vertical.jpg
2140 ms
14-18_geoid-nepal.jpg
4199 ms
14-19_everest-geoidal-section.jpg
2276 ms
mcadd.jpg
2206 ms
india-survey-pdfs.jpg
2317 ms
geodetic-reports.jpg
2291 ms
14-2_height-of-mt-everest.jpg
2250 ms
14-12_mt-everest-photo.jpg
2404 ms
14-1_great-trigonometrical-survey-of-india-1870.jpg
2378 ms
14-3.jpg
4326 ms
14-14_met.jpg
2308 ms
14-7_mt-everest-triangulation.jpg
2392 ms
14-8-1890-gts-latitude-cover.jpg
2335 ms
cropped-img_1382_cropped.jpg
4257 ms
cropped-img_1382_cropped.jpg
2357 ms
actionbar.css
2 ms
actionbar.js
11 ms
jessekozlowski.wordpress.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
jessekozlowski.wordpress.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
jessekozlowski.wordpress.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jessekozlowski.wordpress.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jessekozlowski.wordpress.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jessekozlowski.wordpress.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Jesse Kozlowski Wordpress. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: