Tools & Wizards About Us
jessekozlowski.wordpress.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 54

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    71% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

jessekozlowski.wordpress.com

Jesse Kozlowski, Surveyor | My Surveying Observations, Measurements and Pictures – My YouTube Channel https://m.youtube.com/c/JesseKozlowski

Page Load Speed

22.9 sec in total

First Response

6 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

20.2 sec

jessekozlowski.wordpress.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Jesse Kozlowski Wordpress content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about jessekozlowski.wordpress.com

My Surveying Observations, Measurements and Pictures - My YouTube Channel https://m.youtube.com/c/JesseKozlowski

Visit jessekozlowski.wordpress.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Jessekozlowski.wordpress.com page load time and found that the first response time was 6 ms and then it took 22.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jessekozlowski.wordpress.com performance score

54

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

57/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

34/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.0 s

94/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value590 ms

51/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.2 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jessekozlowski.wordpress.com

6 ms

jessekozlowski.wordpress.com

29 ms

110 ms

119 ms

109 ms

Our browser made a total of 174 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (144 requests) were addressed to the original Jessekozlowski.wordpress.com, 5% (8 requests) were made to S2.wp.com and 2% (4 requests) were made to S0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (982 ms) belongs to the original domain Jessekozlowski.wordpress.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 335.0 kB (11%)

Content Size

3.2 MB

After Optimization

2.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Jessekozlowski.wordpress.com main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 334.1 kB

  • Original 384.6 kB
  • After minification 379.6 kB
  • After compression 50.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 334.1 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 2.6 MB
  • After minification 2.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jesse Kozlowski Wordpress images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 825 B

  • Original 153.3 kB
  • After minification 153.3 kB
  • After compression 152.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 147 B

  • Original 3.6 kB
  • After minification 3.6 kB
  • After compression 3.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jessekozlowski.wordpress.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (11%)

Requests Now

168

After Optimization

149

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 168 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jesse Kozlowski Wordpress. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

jessekozlowski.wordpress.com

jessekozlowski.wordpress.com

6 ms

jessekozlowski.wordpress.com

jessekozlowski.wordpress.com

29 ms

110 ms

119 ms

109 ms

104 ms

104 ms

css

css

140 ms

101 ms

116 ms

global.css

global.css

116 ms

121 ms

hovercards.min.js

hovercards.min.js

116 ms

wpgroho.js

wpgroho.js

114 ms

116 ms

115 ms

w.js

w.js

115 ms

bilmur.min.js

bilmur.min.js

361 ms

conf

conf

221 ms

ga.js

ga.js

66 ms

wpcom-mark.svg

wpcom-mark.svg

24 ms

g.gif

g.gif

139 ms

new-jersey-triangulation-diagram-1976.jpg

new-jersey-triangulation-diagram-1976.jpg

141 ms

inset-281-hudson-river-new-york-to-haverstraw-feb.-1982.jpg

inset-281-hudson-river-new-york-to-haverstraw-feb.-1982.jpg

140 ms

inset-294-delaware-river-smyrna-river-to-wilmington-april-1962.jpg

inset-294-delaware-river-smyrna-river-to-wilmington-april-1962.jpg

141 ms

inset-295-delaware-river-wilmington-to-philadelphia-feb.-1970.jpg

inset-295-delaware-river-wilmington-to-philadelphia-feb.-1970.jpg

183 ms

inset-296-delaware-river-philadelphia-to-trenton-june-1973.jpg

inset-296-delaware-river-philadelphia-to-trenton-june-1973.jpg

181 ms

inset-361-port-jefferson-and-mount-sinai-harbors-new-york-sept.-1962.jpg

inset-361-port-jefferson-and-mount-sinai-harbors-new-york-sept.-1962.jpg

240 ms

inset-369-new-york-harbor-march-1970.jpg

inset-369-new-york-harbor-march-1970.jpg

242 ms

inset-1213-long-island-sound-western-part-connecticut-new-york-june-1972.jpg

inset-1213-long-island-sound-western-part-connecticut-new-york-june-1972.jpg

287 ms

inset-1215-approaches-to-ny-fire-island-light-to-sea-girt-light-ny-nj-may-1968.jpg

inset-1215-approaches-to-ny-fire-island-light-to-sea-girt-light-ny-nj-may-1968.jpg

238 ms

inset-1216-sea-girt-to-little-egg-inlet-new-jersey-nov.-1974.jpg

inset-1216-sea-girt-to-little-egg-inlet-new-jersey-nov.-1974.jpg

274 ms

inset-1217-little-egg-inlet-to-hereford-inlet-new-jersey-nov.-1974.jpg

inset-1217-little-egg-inlet-to-hereford-inlet-new-jersey-nov.-1974.jpg

288 ms

inset-1218-delaware-bay-nj-de-nov.-1974.jpg

inset-1218-delaware-bay-nj-de-nov.-1974.jpg

358 ms

map-12332-raritan-river-raritan-bay-to-new-brunswick-april-1982.jpg

map-12332-raritan-river-raritan-bay-to-new-brunswick-april-1982.jpg

325 ms

triangulation-network-of-the-us-plate-iv.jpg

triangulation-network-of-the-us-plate-iv.jpg

334 ms

special-publication-no.-247-manual-of-geodetic-triangulation-1950.jpg

special-publication-no.-247-manual-of-geodetic-triangulation-1950.jpg

392 ms

zhannas-survey-station-ngs-historical-geodetic-control-diagrams.jpg

zhannas-survey-station-ngs-historical-geodetic-control-diagrams.jpg

392 ms

plate-i.-plan-of-the-principal-triangles-in-england-wales-and-part-of-scotland.jpg

plate-i.-plan-of-the-principal-triangles-in-england-wales-and-part-of-scotland.jpg

379 ms

ordnance-trigonometrical-survey-principal-triangulation-1858.jpg

ordnance-trigonometrical-survey-principal-triangulation-1858.jpg

449 ms

ramsdens-great-theodolite.jpg

ramsdens-great-theodolite.jpg

386 ms

the-great-trigonometrical-survey-of-india.jpg

the-great-trigonometrical-survey-of-india.jpg

464 ms

mount-everest-elevation.jpg

mount-everest-elevation.jpg

473 ms

the-transcontinental-triangulation-and-the-american-arc-of-the-parallel-usc-gs-special-publication-no.-4-1900.jpg

the-transcontinental-triangulation-and-the-american-arc-of-the-parallel-usc-gs-special-publication-no.-4-1900.jpg

476 ms

an-example-of-horizontal-geodetic-control-for-bridge-engineering-and-planning.jpg

an-example-of-horizontal-geodetic-control-for-bridge-engineering-and-planning.jpg

490 ms

louisiana-triangulation-diagram.jpg

louisiana-triangulation-diagram.jpg

503 ms

new-orleans-to-calcasieu-river-east-section-1050.jpg

new-orleans-to-calcasieu-river-east-section-1050.jpg

545 ms

baton_rouge_louisiana_nh_15_6.jpg

baton_rouge_louisiana_nh_15_6.jpg

575 ms

mobile_alabama_mississippi_louisiana_nh_16_4.jpg

mobile_alabama_mississippi_louisiana_nh_16_4.jpg

591 ms

new_orleans_louisiana_nh_15_9.jpg

new_orleans_louisiana_nh_15_9.jpg

599 ms

breton_sound_louisiana_nh_16_7.jpg

breton_sound_louisiana_nh_16_7.jpg

618 ms

lakes-pontchartrain-and-maurepas.jpg

lakes-pontchartrain-and-maurepas.jpg

621 ms

la_spanish-fort_335016_1891_62500_geo.jpg

la_spanish-fort_335016_1891_62500_geo.jpg

621 ms

la_baton-rouge_335209_1961_250000_geo.jpg

la_baton-rouge_335209_1961_250000_geo.jpg

690 ms

la_covington_334422_1935_62500_geo.jpg

la_covington_334422_1935_62500_geo.jpg

674 ms

la_covington_334425_1950_62500_geo.jpg

la_covington_334425_1950_62500_geo.jpg

685 ms

la_ponchatoula_335187_1983_100000_geo.jpg

la_ponchatoula_335187_1983_100000_geo.jpg

731 ms

g.gif

g.gif

133 ms

g.gif

g.gif

132 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

136 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

136 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

49 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWV4exQ.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWV4exQ.ttf

46 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWV4exQ.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWV4exQ.ttf

47 ms

national-geodetic-survey-data-explorer.jpg

national-geodetic-survey-data-explorer.jpg

593 ms

bj4239-designation-lake-station-no-2-1953.jpg

bj4239-designation-lake-station-no-2-1953.jpg

614 ms

bj4300-designation-lake-station-no-1-1953.jpg

bj4300-designation-lake-station-no-1-1953.jpg

658 ms

bj4226-designation-lake-station-no-3-1953.jpg

bj4226-designation-lake-station-no-3-1953.jpg

583 ms

bj4240-designation-lake-station-no-4-1953.jpg

bj4240-designation-lake-station-no-4-1953.jpg

602 ms

36 ms

ata.js

ata.js

14 ms

lp-triang.jpg

lp-triang.jpg

597 ms

highway-triang.jpg

highway-triang.jpg

594 ms

state-boundary.jpg

state-boundary.jpg

609 ms

basic.jpg

basic.jpg

595 ms

fundamentals.jpg

fundamentals.jpg

611 ms

fl-spcs.jpg

fl-spcs.jpg

615 ms

fdot-manual.jpg

fdot-manual.jpg

579 ms

fdot-spcs-zones.jpg

fdot-spcs-zones.jpg

581 ms

fl-manuals.jpg

fl-manuals.jpg

636 ms

flsms.jpg

flsms.jpg

571 ms

screenshot_20200802-145217_drive5552602171158570479.jpg

screenshot_20200802-145217_drive5552602171158570479.jpg

631 ms

1-sokkia.jpg

1-sokkia.jpg

568 ms

1-sokkia_p_167.jpg

1-sokkia_p_167.jpg

585 ms

2-topcon_gts223.jpg

2-topcon_gts223.jpg

582 ms

2-topcon_gts223_p_13-1.jpg

2-topcon_gts223_p_13-1.jpg

563 ms

3-leica.jpg

3-leica.jpg

571 ms

3-leica_p_148.jpg

3-leica_p_148.jpg

498 ms

3-leica_p_155.jpg

3-leica_p_155.jpg

560 ms

4-nikon.jpg

4-nikon.jpg

547 ms

4-nikon_p_115.jpg

4-nikon_p_115.jpg

539 ms

5-trimble_s7.jpg

5-trimble_s7.jpg

546 ms

5-ta_calculations_p9.jpg

5-ta_calculations_p9.jpg

437 ms

5-ta_calculations_p11.jpg

5-ta_calculations_p11.jpg

497 ms

walter-za.jpg

walter-za.jpg

519 ms

1-1.jpg

1-1.jpg

494 ms

1-mcdonald-observatory.jpg

1-mcdonald-observatory.jpg

519 ms

1-mcdonald-observatory-stations-1.jpg

1-mcdonald-observatory-stations-1.jpg

513 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

490 ms

2-rte-206-27-28.jpg

2-rte-206-27-28.jpg

485 ms

2-rte-206-27-28-stations.jpg

2-rte-206-27-28-stations.jpg

482 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

463 ms

3-clarks-edm-cbl.jpg

3-clarks-edm-cbl.jpg

496 ms

3-clarks-edm-cbl-stations.jpg

3-clarks-edm-cbl-stations.jpg

454 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

476 ms

4-l-shape-hainesport.jpg

4-l-shape-hainesport.jpg

457 ms

4-l-shape-hainesport-stations.jpg

4-l-shape-hainesport-stations.jpg

455 ms

5.jpg

5.jpg

440 ms

5-l-shape-200-foot.jpg

5-l-shape-200-foot.jpg

427 ms

5-l-shape-200-foot-stations.jpg

5-l-shape-200-foot-stations.jpg

491 ms

6.jpg

6.jpg

483 ms

6-folsom-cbl-s8.jpg

6-folsom-cbl-s8.jpg

474 ms

6-folsom-cbl-s8-stations.jpg

6-folsom-cbl-s8-stations.jpg

478 ms

7.jpg

7.jpg

437 ms

7-union-lake.jpg

7-union-lake.jpg

424 ms

7-union-lake-stations.jpg

7-union-lake-stations.jpg

453 ms

8.jpg

8.jpg

431 ms

8-cooper-river-lake.jpg

8-cooper-river-lake.jpg

433 ms

8-cooper-river-lake-stations.jpg

8-cooper-river-lake-stations.jpg

435 ms

9-1.jpg

9-1.jpg

452 ms

9-rte-206-7-28-level-line-1.jpg

9-rte-206-7-28-level-line-1.jpg

480 ms

9-2.jpg

9-2.jpg

424 ms

9-rte-206-7-28-level-line-2.jpg

9-rte-206-7-28-level-line-2.jpg

459 ms

9-rte-206-7-28-level-line-1-stations.jpg

9-rte-206-7-28-level-line-1-stations.jpg

466 ms

9-3.jpg

9-3.jpg

448 ms

9-rte-206-7-28-level-line-3.jpg

9-rte-206-7-28-level-line-3.jpg

492 ms

9-rte-206-7-28-level-line-3-stations.jpg

9-rte-206-7-28-level-line-3-stations.jpg

454 ms

10.jpg

10.jpg

456 ms

10-40-75.jpg

10-40-75.jpg

447 ms

10-40-75-stations.jpg

10-40-75-stations.jpg

468 ms

11.jpg

11.jpg

458 ms

11-crows-woods.jpg

11-crows-woods.jpg

475 ms

11-crows-woods-stations.jpg

11-crows-woods-stations.jpg

427 ms

12.jpg

12.jpg

468 ms

12-folsom-cbl-s7.jpg

12-folsom-cbl-s7.jpg

441 ms

12-folsom-cbl-s7-stations.jpg

12-folsom-cbl-s7-stations.jpg

443 ms

13.jpg

13.jpg

448 ms

13-rte-206-quater-mile-traverse.jpg

13-rte-206-quater-mile-traverse.jpg

477 ms

13-rte-206-quater-mile-traverse-stations.jpg

13-rte-206-quater-mile-traverse-stations.jpg

482 ms

14.jpg

14.jpg

463 ms

14-folsom-cbl.jpg

14-folsom-cbl.jpg

469 ms

14-folsom-cbl-stations.jpg

14-folsom-cbl-stations.jpg

484 ms

15.jpg

15.jpg

437 ms

15-40-75.jpg

15-40-75.jpg

477 ms

15-40-75-stations.jpg

15-40-75-stations.jpg

499 ms

16.jpg

16.jpg

449 ms

16-larry-scott.jpg

16-larry-scott.jpg

425 ms

16a-larry-scott.jpg

16a-larry-scott.jpg

470 ms

larry-scott-11-miles.jpg

larry-scott-11-miles.jpg

513 ms

example.jpg

example.jpg

506 ms

ecef-llh.jpg

ecef-llh.jpg

486 ms

gps-edm-dont-match.jpg

gps-edm-dont-match.jpg

497 ms

ngs-edm.jpg

ngs-edm.jpg

492 ms

p-26.jpg

p-26.jpg

464 ms

p-27.jpg

p-27.jpg

530 ms

14-23_1857-mt.everest-map-from-jasb.jpg

14-23_1857-mt.everest-map-from-jasb.jpg

982 ms

14-23_1857-mt.everest-map-from-jasb_closeup.jpg

14-23_1857-mt.everest-map-from-jasb_closeup.jpg

637 ms

14-20_diviation-vertical.jpg

14-20_diviation-vertical.jpg

513 ms

14-18_geoid-nepal.jpg

14-18_geoid-nepal.jpg

533 ms

14-19_everest-geoidal-section.jpg

14-19_everest-geoidal-section.jpg

550 ms

mcadd.jpg

mcadd.jpg

530 ms

india-survey-pdfs.jpg

india-survey-pdfs.jpg

568 ms

geodetic-reports.jpg

geodetic-reports.jpg

607 ms

14-2_height-of-mt-everest.jpg

14-2_height-of-mt-everest.jpg

562 ms

14-12_mt-everest-photo.jpg

14-12_mt-everest-photo.jpg

604 ms

14-1_great-trigonometrical-survey-of-india-1870.jpg

14-1_great-trigonometrical-survey-of-india-1870.jpg

697 ms

14-3.jpg

14-3.jpg

605 ms

14-14_met.jpg

14-14_met.jpg

610 ms

14-7_mt-everest-triangulation.jpg

14-7_mt-everest-triangulation.jpg

596 ms

14-8-1890-gts-latitude-cover.jpg

14-8-1890-gts-latitude-cover.jpg

672 ms

cropped-img_1382_cropped.jpg

cropped-img_1382_cropped.jpg

561 ms

cropped-img_1382_cropped.jpg

cropped-img_1382_cropped.jpg

622 ms

actionbar.css

actionbar.css

2 ms

actionbar.js

actionbar.js

40 ms

Accessibility Review

jessekozlowski.wordpress.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

jessekozlowski.wordpress.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

jessekozlowski.wordpress.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jessekozlowski.wordpress.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jessekozlowski.wordpress.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

jessekozlowski.wordpress.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Jesse Kozlowski Wordpress. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: