Tools & Wizards About Us
journalofhumannutritionanddieteticseditor.wordpress.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 61

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

journalofhumannutritionanddieteticseditor.wordpress.com

Life After Academia – The musings of an Emeritus Professor

Page Load Speed

383 ms in total

First Response

8 ms

Resources Loaded

214 ms

Page Rendered

161 ms

journalofhumannutritionanddieteticseditor.wordpress.com screenshot

About Website

Visit journalofhumannutritionanddieteticseditor.wordpress.com now to see the best up-to-date Journalofhumannutritionanddieteticseditor Wordpress content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about journalofhumannutritionanddieteticseditor.wordpress.com

The musings of an Emeritus Professor

Visit journalofhumannutritionanddieteticseditor.wordpress.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Journalofhumannutritionanddieteticseditor.wordpress.com page load time and found that the first response time was 8 ms and then it took 375 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

journalofhumannutritionanddieteticseditor.wordpress.com performance score

61

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

74/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

46/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.3 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value530 ms

55/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.03

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.0 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

journalofhumannutritionanddieteticseditor.wordpress.com

8 ms

journalofhumannutritionanddieteticseditor.wordpress.com

23 ms

64 ms

coblocks-style.css

66 ms

73 ms

Our browser made a total of 23 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 9% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Journalofhumannutritionanddieteticseditor.wordpress.com, 26% (6 requests) were made to S2.wp.com and 17% (4 requests) were made to S1.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (106 ms) relates to the external source S.pubmine.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 96.0 kB (52%)

Content Size

183.7 kB

After Optimization

87.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Journalofhumannutritionanddieteticseditor.wordpress.com main page is 183.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 121.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 95.2 kB

  • Original 121.0 kB
  • After minification 119.8 kB
  • After compression 25.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 95.2 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 8.2 kB
  • After minification 8.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Journalofhumannutritionanddieteticseditor Wordpress images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 277 B

  • Original 42.0 kB
  • After minification 42.0 kB
  • After compression 41.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 498 B

  • Original 12.5 kB
  • After minification 12.5 kB
  • After compression 12.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Journalofhumannutritionanddieteticseditor.wordpress.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (53%)

Requests Now

19

After Optimization

9

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Journalofhumannutritionanddieteticseditor Wordpress. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

journalofhumannutritionanddieteticseditor.wordpress.com

journalofhumannutritionanddieteticseditor.wordpress.com

8 ms

journalofhumannutritionanddieteticseditor.wordpress.com

journalofhumannutritionanddieteticseditor.wordpress.com

23 ms

64 ms

coblocks-style.css

coblocks-style.css

66 ms

73 ms

76 ms

global.css

global.css

71 ms

77 ms

hovercards.min.js

hovercards.min.js

73 ms

wpgroho.js

wpgroho.js

69 ms

73 ms

w.js

w.js

86 ms

conf

conf

106 ms

ga.js

ga.js

37 ms

wpcom-gray-white.png

wpcom-gray-white.png

9 ms

wpcom-mark.svg

wpcom-mark.svg

6 ms

g.gif

g.gif

68 ms

73 ms

g.gif

g.gif

66 ms

g.gif

g.gif

67 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

12 ms

libre-franklin_700.ttf

libre-franklin_700.ttf

5 ms

libre-franklin_regular.ttf

libre-franklin_regular.ttf

3 ms

Accessibility Review

journalofhumannutritionanddieteticseditor.wordpress.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

journalofhumannutritionanddieteticseditor.wordpress.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

journalofhumannutritionanddieteticseditor.wordpress.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Journalofhumannutritionanddieteticseditor.wordpress.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Journalofhumannutritionanddieteticseditor.wordpress.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

journalofhumannutritionanddieteticseditor.wordpress.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Journalofhumannutritionanddieteticseditor Wordpress. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: