Tools & Wizards About Us
labelname.wordpress.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 59

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 88

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

labelname.wordpress.com

Labelname | Businesses that deal in products like soft toys and apparels, need simple name tapes with color variations. Polyester base is preferred as...

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

14 ms

Resources Loaded

719 ms

Page Rendered

648 ms

labelname.wordpress.com screenshot

About Website

Visit labelname.wordpress.com now to see the best up-to-date Labelname Wordpress content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about labelname.wordpress.com

Businesses that deal in products like soft toys and apparels, need simple name tapes with color variations. Polyester base is preferred as it makes them soft to touch and easily washable.

Visit labelname.wordpress.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Labelname.wordpress.com page load time and found that the first response time was 14 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

labelname.wordpress.com performance score

59

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

68/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

61/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.4 s

74/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value610 ms

49/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.073

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.6 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

labelname.wordpress.com

14 ms

labelname.wordpress.com

209 ms

135 ms

global.css

140 ms

146 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Labelname.wordpress.com, 33% (13 requests) were made to S1.wp.com and 15% (6 requests) were made to Labelname.files.wordpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (231 ms) relates to the external source Labelname.files.wordpress.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 402.7 kB (49%)

Content Size

827.7 kB

After Optimization

425.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Labelname.wordpress.com main page is 827.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 460.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 37.6 kB

  • Original 52.0 kB
  • After minification 50.2 kB
  • After compression 14.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.6 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.0 kB

  • Original 271.8 kB
  • After minification 270.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Labelname Wordpress images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 332.0 kB

  • Original 460.0 kB
  • After minification 350.7 kB
  • After compression 127.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 332.0 kB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 32.1 kB

  • Original 44.0 kB
  • After minification 41.5 kB
  • After compression 11.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Labelname.wordpress.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 32.1 kB or 73% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (71%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Labelname Wordpress. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

labelname.wordpress.com

labelname.wordpress.com

14 ms

labelname.wordpress.com

labelname.wordpress.com

209 ms

135 ms

global.css

global.css

140 ms

146 ms

style.css

style.css

143 ms

gprofiles.js

gprofiles.js

223 ms

wpgroho.js

wpgroho.js

141 ms

141 ms

jetpack-carousel.css

jetpack-carousel.css

139 ms

tiled-gallery.css

tiled-gallery.css

136 ms

141 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

142 ms

135 ms

725X1342.skimlinks.js

725X1342.skimlinks.js

175 ms

w.js

w.js

174 ms

merriweather.css

merriweather.css

13 ms

cropped-labelname.jpg

cropped-labelname.jpg

119 ms

bg-header.png

bg-header.png

20 ms

ico-rss.png

ico-rss.png

22 ms

bg-postdate.png

bg-postdate.png

40 ms

indentline.png

indentline.png

39 ms

indentline-light.png

indentline-light.png

39 ms

fabric-labels-1.jpg

fabric-labels-1.jpg

231 ms

woven-labels1.jpg

woven-labels1.jpg

184 ms

name-tapes1.jpg

name-tapes1.jpg

177 ms

woven-labels-uk-1.jpg

woven-labels-uk-1.jpg

183 ms

personalised-labels.jpg

personalised-labels.jpg

199 ms

global-print.css

global-print.css

30 ms

Noticons.svg

Noticons.svg

67 ms

BaABdRAi2AAAA

BaABdRAi2AAAA

65 ms

merriweather-bold-webfont.ttf

merriweather-bold-webfont.ttf

67 ms

merriweather-regular-webfont.ttf

merriweather-regular-webfont.ttf

68 ms

merriweather-light-webfont.ttf

merriweather-light-webfont.ttf

67 ms

78 ms

hovercard.css

hovercard.css

74 ms

services.css

services.css

100 ms

g.gif

g.gif

45 ms

g.gif

g.gif

43 ms

g.gif

g.gif

45 ms

Accessibility Review

labelname.wordpress.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

labelname.wordpress.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

labelname.wordpress.com SEO score

88

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Labelname.wordpress.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Labelname.wordpress.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

labelname.wordpress.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Labelname Wordpress. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: