Tools & Wizards About Us
priestleypie.wordpress.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

Page Load Speed

4.8 sec in total

First Response

9 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

2.6 sec

priestleypie.wordpress.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Priestley Pie Wordpress content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about priestleypie.wordpress.com

Visit priestleypie.wordpress.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Priestleypie.wordpress.com page load time and found that the first response time was 9 ms and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

priestleypie.wordpress.com performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

54/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.6 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.5 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value7,350 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value45.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

priestleypie.wordpress.com

9 ms

priestleypie.wordpress.com

335 ms

176 ms

style.css

160 ms

181 ms

Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Priestleypie.wordpress.com, 17% (11 requests) were made to S2.wp.com and 17% (11 requests) were made to Priestleypie.files.wordpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Eventbrite.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 114.5 kB (7%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Priestleypie.wordpress.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 109.4 kB

  • Original 143.5 kB
  • After minification 138.9 kB
  • After compression 34.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 109.4 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 279.1 kB
  • After minification 277.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Priestley Pie Wordpress images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2.8 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 1.1 MB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 86.8 kB
  • After minification 86.8 kB
  • After compression 85.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Priestleypie.wordpress.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (63%)

Requests Now

59

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Priestley Pie Wordpress. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

priestleypie.wordpress.com

priestleypie.wordpress.com

9 ms

priestleypie.wordpress.com

priestleypie.wordpress.com

335 ms

176 ms

style.css

style.css

160 ms

181 ms

174 ms

block-editor.css

block-editor.css

190 ms

171 ms

global.css

global.css

175 ms

179 ms

default.css

default.css

170 ms

hovercards.min.js

hovercards.min.js

187 ms

wpgroho.js

wpgroho.js

171 ms

184 ms

tiled-gallery.css

tiled-gallery.css

182 ms

smart.js

smart.js

215 ms

181 ms

eb_widgets.js

eb_widgets.js

285 ms

183 ms

w.js

w.js

185 ms

bilmur.min.js

bilmur.min.js

107 ms

global-print.css

global-print.css

29 ms

conf

conf

149 ms

importmap-polyfill.min.js

importmap-polyfill.min.js

5 ms

ga.js

ga.js

95 ms

xmaspylonoct23ounline4.jpg

xmaspylonoct23ounline4.jpg

170 ms

priestley_banner2_2000x500_2023ii.jpg

priestley_banner2_2000x500_2023ii.jpg

173 ms

cb140b3f3fe63f2d7a592f6674ee52693e1ce92d95aa6f7cad4152542708be3e

cb140b3f3fe63f2d7a592f6674ee52693e1ce92d95aa6f7cad4152542708be3e

55 ms

924f3b6c30c208aee0553d145fdc7c7ddadfb311bdafbe97ae524594e023a891

924f3b6c30c208aee0553d145fdc7c7ddadfb311bdafbe97ae524594e023a891

67 ms

bodytile.jpg

bodytile.jpg

67 ms

date.png

date.png

67 ms

bullet.png

bullet.png

66 ms

wpcom-gray-white.png

wpcom-gray-white.png

66 ms

ermine-st_guardblaise.jpg

ermine-st_guardblaise.jpg

146 ms

xmas-22-web-3sm.jpg

xmas-22-web-3sm.jpg

157 ms

blaise-22-fest-poster2i.jpg

blaise-22-fest-poster2i.jpg

151 ms

piepriestley2021-printposter-9.png

piepriestley2021-printposter-9.png

138 ms

palmerston-wool-exchange.jpg

palmerston-wool-exchange.jpg

151 ms

wool-exchange-foundation-stone.png

wool-exchange-foundation-stone.png

163 ms

wool-exchange-roof.jpg

wool-exchange-roof.jpg

159 ms

wool-exchange-bfd-shield.png

wool-exchange-bfd-shield.png

164 ms

wool-exchange-walk-21iisq.jpg

wool-exchange-walk-21iisq.jpg

159 ms

hat-throwing-2021-2poster-5.jpg

hat-throwing-2021-2poster-5.jpg

162 ms

checkout-external

checkout-external

1422 ms

checkout-external

checkout-external

1360 ms

g.gif

g.gif

89 ms

88 ms

g.gif

g.gif

86 ms

g.gif

g.gif

89 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

32 ms

ata.js

ata.js

47 ms

checkout--18.20.1--eds-3.2.10.css

checkout--18.20.1--eds-3.2.10.css

78 ms

checkout.584314ce8d6749c4a52c.css

checkout.584314ce8d6749c4a52c.css

91 ms

4942.0ff87995a65309a8030e.css

4942.0ff87995a65309a8030e.css

75 ms

airgap.js

airgap.js

72 ms

jsi18n_en-gb.js

jsi18n_en-gb.js

104 ms

vendor.a782a66694588ef3d180.dll.js

vendor.a782a66694588ef3d180.dll.js

149 ms

vendor.b2766104c6dba28553b3.web.js

vendor.b2766104c6dba28553b3.web.js

145 ms

checkout.18bc9b4a019729f41896.web.js

checkout.18bc9b4a019729f41896.web.js

155 ms

7128.1ec5b426e995b3c2603b.async.web.js

7128.1ec5b426e995b3c2603b.async.web.js

145 ms

StatusModule.f16a90c4b6cfb565e093.async.web.js

StatusModule.f16a90c4b6cfb565e093.async.web.js

145 ms

8fAR7UgwAAAAABAAAAANQYFhEAAAAA1VWccAAAAADXxqYf

8fAR7UgwAAAAABAAAAANQYFhEAAAAA1VWccAAAAADXxqYf

20 ms

VLNbeAAAAAAEAAAAA1BgWEQAAAADVVZxwAAAAANfGpj8=

VLNbeAAAAAAEAAAAA1BgWEQAAAADVVZxwAAAAANfGpj8=

17 ms

X8BsrgguQAAAAAAAQAAAADUGBYRAAAAANVVnHAAAAAA18ZsBQ==

X8BsrgguQAAAAAAAQAAAADUGBYRAAAAANVVnHAAAAAA18ZsBQ==

16 ms

wKHIpk3AAAAAAABAAAAANQYFhEAAAAA1VWccAAAAADX9Q0B

wKHIpk3AAAAAAABAAAAANQYFhEAAAAA1VWccAAAAADX9Q0B

14 ms

Accessibility Review

priestleypie.wordpress.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

priestleypie.wordpress.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

priestleypie.wordpress.com SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Priestleypie.wordpress.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Priestleypie.wordpress.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

priestleypie.wordpress.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Priestley Pie Wordpress. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: