Report Summary

  • 73

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    82% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

protal.wordpress.com

Dieta Protal | …czyli jak wykorzystuję plan protal dr Pierre Dukana.

Page Load Speed

422 ms in total

First Response

9 ms

Resources Loaded

285 ms

Page Rendered

128 ms

protal.wordpress.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Protal Wordpress content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about protal.wordpress.com

Witam:) Cieszę się, że odwiedzasz moją stronę:) Mam nadzieję, że znajdziesz tu przydatne dla siebie informacje. Stronę stworzyłam ze względu na, moim zdaniem, dość ograniczone informacje w sieci na te...

Visit protal.wordpress.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Protal.wordpress.com page load time and found that the first response time was 9 ms and then it took 413 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

protal.wordpress.com performance score

73

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

71/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

92/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.7 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value500 ms

58/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.2 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

protal.wordpress.com

9 ms

protal.wordpress.com

26 ms

122 ms

style.css

116 ms

131 ms

Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 7% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Protal.wordpress.com, 44% (12 requests) were made to S2.wp.com and 11% (3 requests) were made to S1.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (135 ms) relates to the external source S1.wp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 53.6 kB (29%)

Content Size

184.8 kB

After Optimization

131.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Protal.wordpress.com main page is 184.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 74.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 53.2 kB

  • Original 74.1 kB
  • After minification 73.0 kB
  • After compression 20.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.2 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 49.5 kB
  • After minification 49.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Protal Wordpress images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 274 B

  • Original 44.3 kB
  • After minification 44.3 kB
  • After compression 44.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 123 B

  • Original 16.9 kB
  • After minification 16.9 kB
  • After compression 16.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Protal.wordpress.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (52%)

Requests Now

25

After Optimization

12

The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Protal Wordpress. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

protal.wordpress.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

protal.wordpress.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

protal.wordpress.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    PL

  • Language Claimed

    PL

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Protal.wordpress.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Polish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Protal.wordpress.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Protal Wordpress. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: