Tools & Wizards About Us
r4vs.wordpress.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 45

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 84% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    67% of websites

r4vs.wordpress.com

Blog Ready4Ventures | Just another WordPress.com site

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

12 ms

Resources Loaded

973 ms

Page Rendered

996 ms

r4vs.wordpress.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to r4vs.wordpress.com homepage info - get ready to check R 4 Vs Word Press best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about r4vs.wordpress.com

Just another WordPress.com site

Visit r4vs.wordpress.com

Key Findings

We analyzed R4vs.wordpress.com page load time and found that the first response time was 12 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

r4vs.wordpress.com performance score

45

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

66/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

59/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.7 s

69/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,070 ms

7/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.1

90/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.4 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

r4vs.wordpress.com

12 ms

r4vs.wordpress.com

335 ms

99 ms

global.css

104 ms

105 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original R4vs.wordpress.com, 20% (10 requests) were made to S0.wp.com and 20% (10 requests) were made to Polldaddy.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (353 ms) relates to the external source Polldaddy.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 482.5 kB (55%)

Content Size

871.3 kB

After Optimization

388.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of R4vs.wordpress.com main page is 871.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 507.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 77.2 kB

  • Original 99.7 kB
  • After minification 98.4 kB
  • After compression 22.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 77.2 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 158 B

  • Original 220.6 kB
  • After minification 220.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. R 4 Vs Word Press images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 373.0 kB

  • Original 507.0 kB
  • After minification 396.5 kB
  • After compression 134.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 373.0 kB or 74% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 32.1 kB

  • Original 43.9 kB
  • After minification 41.4 kB
  • After compression 11.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. R4vs.wordpress.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 32.1 kB or 73% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (67%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

15

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of R 4 Vs Word Press. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

r4vs.wordpress.com

r4vs.wordpress.com

12 ms

r4vs.wordpress.com

r4vs.wordpress.com

335 ms

99 ms

global.css

global.css

104 ms

105 ms

style.css

style.css

96 ms

gprofiles.js

gprofiles.js

221 ms

wpgroho.js

wpgroho.js

107 ms

106 ms

rating.js

rating.js

353 ms

jetpack-carousel.css

jetpack-carousel.css

104 ms

tiled-gallery.css

tiled-gallery.css

93 ms

124 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

233 ms

103 ms

725X1342.skimlinks.js

725X1342.skimlinks.js

168 ms

w.js

w.js

122 ms

merriweather.css

merriweather.css

32 ms

bodybackground.jpg

bodybackground.jpg

156 ms

icon_feed.gif

icon_feed.gif

17 ms

logo_760x190.png

logo_760x190.png

145 ms

tech-media-europe-porto.jpg

tech-media-europe-porto.jpg

173 ms

myntmarket-logo.jpeg

myntmarket-logo.jpeg

173 ms

patentes.jpg

patentes.jpg

174 ms

elevator-pitch.jpg

elevator-pitch.jpg

210 ms

perfiles-de-inversic3b3ntc3adpicos1.jpg

perfiles-de-inversic3b3ntc3adpicos1.jpg

292 ms

underline1.jpg

underline1.jpg

9 ms

shadow.gif

shadow.gif

9 ms

sideheadtop.gif

sideheadtop.gif

9 ms

global-print.css

global-print.css

9 ms

Noticons.svg

Noticons.svg

25 ms

BaABdRAi2AAAA

BaABdRAi2AAAA

2 ms

merriweather-bold-webfont.ttf

merriweather-bold-webfont.ttf

31 ms

merriweather-regular-webfont.ttf

merriweather-regular-webfont.ttf

29 ms

merriweather-light-webfont.ttf

merriweather-light-webfont.ttf

31 ms

rate.php

rate.php

109 ms

rate.php

rate.php

137 ms

rate.php

rate.php

192 ms

rate.php

rate.php

201 ms

rate.php

rate.php

230 ms

rate.php

rate.php

244 ms

rate.php

rate.php

270 ms

shadow_top.gif

shadow_top.gif

22 ms

56 ms

hovercard.css

hovercard.css

45 ms

services.css

services.css

74 ms

g.gif

g.gif

38 ms

g.gif

g.gif

45 ms

g.gif

g.gif

46 ms

star-yellow-sml.png

star-yellow-sml.png

125 ms

info.png

info.png

108 ms

Accessibility Review

r4vs.wordpress.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

r4vs.wordpress.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

r4vs.wordpress.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ES

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise R4vs.wordpress.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that R4vs.wordpress.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

r4vs.wordpress.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of R 4 Vs Word Press. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: