Tools & Wizards About Us
ritool.wordpress.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    67% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 88

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

ritool.wordpress.com

Wifi Indihome Batam | Wifi, Wifi Rumah, Internet, Indihome, Telepon Rumah, pasang wifi, pasang indihome, TV Indihome, saluran tv, harga pasang wifi, h...

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

11 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

ritool.wordpress.com screenshot

About Website

Visit ritool.wordpress.com now to see the best up-to-date Ritool Wordpress content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ritool.wordpress.com

Wifi, Wifi Rumah, Internet, Indihome, Telepon Rumah, pasang wifi, pasang indihome, TV Indihome, saluran tv, harga pasang wifi, harga pasang internet, cara pasang wifi rumah, cara pasang internet rumah...

Visit ritool.wordpress.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ritool.wordpress.com page load time and found that the first response time was 11 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ritool.wordpress.com performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

68/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

69/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.6 s

52/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,490 ms

14/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.4 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ritool.wordpress.com

11 ms

ritool.wordpress.com

1062 ms

114 ms

127 ms

130 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Ritool.wordpress.com, 33% (19 requests) were made to S2.wp.com and 11% (6 requests) were made to 0.gravatar.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Ritool.wordpress.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 426.8 kB (68%)

Content Size

626.7 kB

After Optimization

199.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ritool.wordpress.com main page is 626.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 460.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 58.9 kB

  • Original 81.1 kB
  • After minification 79.9 kB
  • After compression 22.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 58.9 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 3.8 kB

  • Original 41.8 kB
  • After minification 37.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ritool Wordpress images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 332.0 kB

  • Original 460.1 kB
  • After minification 350.8 kB
  • After compression 128.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 332.0 kB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 32.0 kB

  • Original 43.7 kB
  • After minification 41.2 kB
  • After compression 11.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ritool.wordpress.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 73% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (82%)

Requests Now

49

After Optimization

9

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ritool Wordpress. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ritool.wordpress.com

ritool.wordpress.com

11 ms

ritool.wordpress.com

ritool.wordpress.com

1062 ms

114 ms

127 ms

130 ms

style.css

style.css

125 ms

gprofiles.js

gprofiles.js

231 ms

wpgroho.js

wpgroho.js

123 ms

122 ms

jetpack-carousel.css

jetpack-carousel.css

129 ms

tiled-gallery.css

tiled-gallery.css

126 ms

132 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

306 ms

124 ms

725X1342.skimlinks.js

725X1342.skimlinks.js

177 ms

w.js

w.js

129 ms

merriweather.css

merriweather.css

26 ms

bg_body.gif

bg_body.gif

31 ms

cropped-ritool-a.jpg

cropped-ritool-a.jpg

382 ms

bg_header_overlay.png

bg_header_overlay.png

32 ms

e55640522233946f9d864c118ca055c7

e55640522233946f9d864c118ca055c7

713 ms

search.jpg

search.jpg

308 ms

bendera-merah-putih.jpeg

bendera-merah-putih.jpeg

308 ms

bg_tab_right.gif

bg_tab_right.gif

14 ms

bg_tab_left.gif

bg_tab_left.gif

33 ms

feed_icon.png

feed_icon.png

36 ms

bg_page_bottom.gif

bg_page_bottom.gif

14 ms

bg_page_top.gif

bg_page_top.gif

35 ms

bg_ul_li.gif

bg_ul_li.gif

37 ms

bg_arrow_right_2.gif

bg_arrow_right_2.gif

38 ms

bg_narrowcol.gif

bg_narrowcol.gif

38 ms

bg_narrowcol_bottom.gif

bg_narrowcol_bottom.gif

40 ms

bg_narrowcol_top.gif

bg_narrowcol_top.gif

41 ms

ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536

ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536

267 ms

global-print.css

global-print.css

30 ms

Noticons.svg

Noticons.svg

164 ms

BaABdRAi2AAAA

BaABdRAi2AAAA

119 ms

merriweather-bold-webfont.ttf

merriweather-bold-webfont.ttf

172 ms

merriweather-regular-webfont.ttf

merriweather-regular-webfont.ttf

163 ms

merriweather-light-webfont.ttf

merriweather-light-webfont.ttf

185 ms

160 ms

hovercard.css

hovercard.css

152 ms

services.css

services.css

152 ms

80 ms

g.gif

g.gif

76 ms

g.gif

g.gif

71 ms

g.gif

g.gif

72 ms

ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536

ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536

112 ms

ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536

ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536

26 ms

ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536

ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536

47 ms

ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536

ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536

110 ms

ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536

ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536

27 ms

ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536

ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536

29 ms

link

link

33 ms

track.php

track.php

72 ms

ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536

ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536

30 ms

ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536

ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536

28 ms

Accessibility Review

ritool.wordpress.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

ritool.wordpress.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

ritool.wordpress.com SEO score

88

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ID

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ritool.wordpress.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Ritool.wordpress.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ritool.wordpress.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ritool Wordpress. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: