1.5 sec in total
43 ms
887 ms
595 ms
Welcome to silodome.wordpress.com homepage info - get ready to check Silodome Word Press best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about silodome.wordpress.com
NOTICE: THIS IS A NON-FUNCTIONAL ALPHA TESTING WEBSITE. FOR MOCK-UP PURPOSES ONLY.
Visit silodome.wordpress.comWe analyzed Silodome.wordpress.com page load time and found that the first response time was 43 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
silodome.wordpress.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.2 s
77/100
10%
Value13.1 s
0/100
25%
Value2.3 s
99/100
10%
Value40 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.438
21/100
15%
Value3.2 s
95/100
10%
43 ms
225 ms
170 ms
179 ms
185 ms
Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 7% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Silodome.wordpress.com, 31% (9 requests) were made to S1.wp.com and 17% (5 requests) were made to Silodome.files.wordpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (310 ms) relates to the external source Silodome.files.wordpress.com.
Page size can be reduced by 226.0 kB (10%)
2.2 MB
2.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Silodome.wordpress.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 14.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.9 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Silodome Word Press images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 207.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 207.9 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Silodome.wordpress.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.1 kB or 47% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (38%)
21
13
The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Silodome Word Press. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
silodome.wordpress.com
43 ms
silodome.wordpress.com
225 ms
170 ms
179 ms
style.css
185 ms
183 ms
grunion.css
183 ms
182 ms
725X1342.skimlinks.js
280 ms
w.js
182 ms
merriweather.css
16 ms
background.jpg
301 ms
content-background.png
55 ms
headerlogo1.jpg
246 ms
silodome_landingpage_top.jpg
310 ms
silodome_landingpage_bottom_left.jpg
242 ms
silodome_landingpage_bottom_right.jpg
249 ms
Genericons.svg
92 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=
24 ms
genericons-regular-webfont.woff
126 ms
Noticons.svg
103 ms
BaABdRAi2AAAA
48 ms
merriweather-bold-webfont.ttf
164 ms
merriweather-regular-webfont.ttf
139 ms
merriweather-light-webfont.ttf
163 ms
168 ms
g.gif
137 ms
g.gif
136 ms
g.gif
136 ms
silodome.wordpress.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
silodome.wordpress.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
silodome.wordpress.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Silodome.wordpress.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Silodome.wordpress.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
silodome.wordpress.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Silodome Word Press. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: