Tools & Wizards About Us
systools.wordrecoverytool.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    41% of other websites

  • 66

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

systools.wordrecoverytool.com

MS Word Recovery Tool to Recover & Repair Corrupt MS Word (Docx) Files

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

196 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

431 ms

systools.wordrecoverytool.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to systools.wordrecoverytool.com homepage info - get ready to check Sys Tool S Word Recovery best content right away, or after learning these important things about systools.wordrecoverytool.com

Word recovery tool to recover damaged DOCX files quickly. Word document recovery easily repair corrupted Word file from Microsoft Word 2007, 2010, 2013, 2016, & 2019.

Visit systools.wordrecoverytool.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Systools.wordrecoverytool.com page load time and found that the first response time was 196 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

systools.wordrecoverytool.com performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

9/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.4 s

27/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,160 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.042

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.0 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

systools.wordrecoverytool.com

196 ms

www.systools.wordrecoverytool.com

218 ms

www.2013.wordrecoverytool.com

190 ms

www.wordrecoverytool.com

305 ms

www.wordrecoverytool.com

705 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Systools.wordrecoverytool.com, 63% (37 requests) were made to Wordrecoverytool.com and 8% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (751 ms) relates to the external source Wordrecoverytool.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 189.0 kB (11%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Systools.wordrecoverytool.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 48.1 kB

  • Original 58.2 kB
  • After minification 43.1 kB
  • After compression 10.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 15.2 kB, which is 26% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.1 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 110.6 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 930.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Sys Tool S Word Recovery needs image optimization as it can save up to 110.6 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 19.7 kB

  • Original 451.0 kB
  • After minification 451.0 kB
  • After compression 431.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 10.6 kB

  • Original 98.4 kB
  • After minification 98.4 kB
  • After compression 87.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Systools.wordrecoverytool.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.6 kB or 11% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (48%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

25

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sys Tool S Word Recovery. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

systools.wordrecoverytool.com

systools.wordrecoverytool.com

196 ms

www.systools.wordrecoverytool.com

www.systools.wordrecoverytool.com

218 ms

www.2013.wordrecoverytool.com

www.2013.wordrecoverytool.com

190 ms

www.wordrecoverytool.com

www.wordrecoverytool.com

305 ms

www.wordrecoverytool.com

www.wordrecoverytool.com

705 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

149 ms

fontello.css

fontello.css

188 ms

style.css

style.css

200 ms

css-stars.css

css-stars.css

195 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

229 ms

owl.theme.css

owl.theme.css

230 ms

js

js

62 ms

api.js

api.js

47 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

192 ms

examples.js

examples.js

318 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

318 ms

jquery.barrating.js

jquery.barrating.js

317 ms

ajax-send-email.js

ajax-send-email.js

317 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

372 ms

custom.js

custom.js

316 ms

typewriter.js

typewriter.js

382 ms

LEhKH9Vznag

LEhKH9Vznag

250 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

143 ms

logo1.png

logo1.png

195 ms

slider.png

slider.png

224 ms

softpedia.png

softpedia.png

303 ms

software-suggest.png

software-suggest.png

223 ms

freedownloadmanager.png

freedownloadmanager.png

231 ms

recovery-wizard.png

recovery-wizard.png

304 ms

preview-word.png

preview-word.png

303 ms

3-recovery-modes.png

3-recovery-modes.png

591 ms

doc-file-formatting.png

doc-file-formatting.png

495 ms

auto-detect.png

auto-detect.png

496 ms

save.png

save.png

590 ms

1.png

1.png

591 ms

12.png

12.png

592 ms

18.png

18.png

619 ms

22.png

22.png

619 ms

error.jpg

error.jpg

591 ms

e1.PNG

e1.PNG

591 ms

e2.PNG

e2.PNG

751 ms

e3.PNG

e3.PNG

668 ms

e4.PNG

e4.PNG

751 ms

fontello.woff

fontello.woff

495 ms

fallback

fallback

273 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

9 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

36 ms

base.js

base.js

70 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

175 ms

fallback__ltr.css

fallback__ltr.css

127 ms

em-mboKNCEGvkB-sChFEq9S_yY02WXLtG5xXFnlaaoo.js

em-mboKNCEGvkB-sChFEq9S_yY02WXLtG5xXFnlaaoo.js

102 ms

embed.js

embed.js

60 ms

css

css

130 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

127 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

128 ms

id

id

100 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

22 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

5 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

7 ms

Accessibility Review

systools.wordrecoverytool.com accessibility score

66

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[role]s are not contained by their required parent element

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

systools.wordrecoverytool.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

systools.wordrecoverytool.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Systools.wordrecoverytool.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Systools.wordrecoverytool.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

systools.wordrecoverytool.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sys Tool S Word Recovery. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: