3 sec in total
266 ms
2.6 sec
148 ms
Visit tracking.webaffect.net now to see the best up-to-date Tracking Webaffect content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about tracking.webaffect.net
Visit tracking.webaffect.netWe analyzed Tracking.webaffect.net page load time and found that the first response time was 266 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
tracking.webaffect.net performance score
266 ms
131 ms
174 ms
165 ms
127 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Tracking.webaffect.net, 7% (4 requests) were made to Google.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (682 ms) belongs to the original domain Tracking.webaffect.net.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (75%)
1.4 MB
348.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Tracking.webaffect.net main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 21.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.5 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 34 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tracking Webaffect images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 933.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 933.3 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 110.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tracking.webaffect.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 110.6 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (91%)
56
5
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tracking Webaffect. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
login.php
266 ms
style.css
131 ms
jquery.wysiwyg.css
174 ms
facebox.css
165 ms
visualize.css
127 ms
date_input.css
162 ms
Aristo.css
208 ms
farbtastic.css
205 ms
select2.css
223 ms
jplayer-black-and-blue.css
330 ms
tooltipster.css
208 ms
jsapi
50 ms
jquery.js
328 ms
jquery.tooltipster.min.js
365 ms
modernizr.custom.83977.js
337 ms
jquery.jplayer.min.js
324 ms
farbtastic.js
369 ms
jquery.noty.js
406 ms
top.js
412 ms
topLeft.js
411 ms
topRight.js
416 ms
default.js
432 ms
select2.min.js
506 ms
moment-timezone.min.js
461 ms
PhoneFormat.js
606 ms
tts.audio.plugin.js
468 ms
jquery.js
568 ms
jquery.ui.js
631 ms
jquery.img.preload.js
544 ms
jquery.filestyle.mini.js
536 ms
jquery.wysiwyg.js
583 ms
jquery.date_input.pack.js
586 ms
facebox.js
601 ms
jquery.visualize.js
625 ms
jquery.visualize.tooltip.js
682 ms
jquery.select_skin.js
645 ms
jquery.tablesorter.min.js
661 ms
ajaxupload.js
655 ms
jquery.pngfix.js
572 ms
stylesheet.css
582 ms
jquery.ui.timepicker.addon.js
607 ms
custom.js
577 ms
user.js
573 ms
20 ms
ui+en.css
4 ms
format+en,default+en,ui+en,annotatedtimeline+en,corechart+en.I.js
25 ms
annotatedtimeline.css
55 ms
bg.jpg
77 ms
hld.jpg
112 ms
bnd.gif
68 ms
bhead.gif
56 ms
bheadl.gif
63 ms
bheadr.gif
57 ms
phs.gif
122 ms
btns.gif
117 ms
bendl.gif
122 ms
bendr.gif
116 ms
TitilliumText999wt.ttf
492 ms
TitilliumText800wt.ttf
409 ms
tracking.webaffect.net SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tracking.webaffect.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Tracking.webaffect.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tracking.webaffect.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Tracking Webaffect. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: