2.9 sec in total
195 ms
2.1 sec
555 ms
Visit w3affinity.com now to see the best up-to-date W3 Affinity content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about w3affinity.com
Digital Marketing Agency With A Passion To Grow Your Business Online Through Proven SEO, PPC, and Web Design Strategies.
Visit w3affinity.comWe analyzed W3affinity.com page load time and found that the first response time was 195 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
w3affinity.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.5 s
15/100
10%
Value8.1 s
2/100
25%
Value7.9 s
23/100
10%
Value970 ms
28/100
30%
Value0.126
82/100
15%
Value10.0 s
27/100
10%
195 ms
399 ms
29 ms
30 ms
26 ms
Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (92 requests) were addressed to the original W3affinity.com, 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Challenges.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (399 ms) belongs to the original domain W3affinity.com.
Page size can be reduced by 329.2 kB (43%)
763.0 kB
433.8 kB
In fact, the total size of W3affinity.com main page is 763.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 388.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 327.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 327.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. W3 Affinity images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 940 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. W3affinity.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 65 (72%)
90
25
The browser has sent 90 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of W3 Affinity. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 34 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
w3affinity.com
195 ms
www.w3affinity.com
399 ms
grid-system.css
29 ms
style.css
30 ms
element-fancy-box.css
26 ms
element-flip-box.css
41 ms
element-highlighted-text.css
39 ms
element-toggles.css
42 ms
element-milestone.css
41 ms
owl-carousel.css
64 ms
element-icon-with-text.css
55 ms
element-wpb-column-border.css
65 ms
steadysets.css
64 ms
4f008a4e3b30.google-fonts.min.css
67 ms
responsive.css
70 ms
ascend.css
68 ms
menu-dynamic.css
23 ms
js_composer.min.css
27 ms
basic.min.css
30 ms
theme-ie11.min.css
38 ms
theme.min.css
35 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
54 ms
frontend.min.css
50 ms
swiper.min.css
47 ms
e-swiper.min.css
48 ms
post-2736.css
56 ms
frontend.min.css
60 ms
5b33e095ef45.google-fonts.min.css
62 ms
e5c3383b66a0.google-fonts.min.css
63 ms
jquery.min.js
77 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
62 ms
jquery.json.min.js
76 ms
gravityforms.min.js
199 ms
utils.min.js
200 ms
js
206 ms
font-awesome.min.css
198 ms
animate.min.css
205 ms
148534f402d4.google-fonts.min.css
202 ms
be5ad7f7e260.google-fonts.min.css
200 ms
style-non-critical.css
211 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
207 ms
core.css
208 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
206 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
210 ms
priority.js
241 ms
transit.min.js
240 ms
waypoints.js
241 ms
imagesLoaded.min.js
240 ms
hoverintent.min.js
237 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
237 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
234 ms
anime.min.js
236 ms
stickkit.js
236 ms
superfish.js
228 ms
init.js
226 ms
touchswipe.min.js
223 ms
lazyload.min.js
219 ms
dom-ready.min.js
223 ms
hooks.min.js
209 ms
i18n.min.js
210 ms
a11y.min.js
205 ms
api.js
21 ms
placeholders.jquery.min.js
204 ms
vendor-theme.min.js
204 ms
scripts-theme.min.js
201 ms
scripts-theme.min.js
199 ms
vendor-theme.min.js
197 ms
pminstantpage.min.js
186 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
174 ms
W3Affinity_BlueGray_Horiz250.png
158 ms
W3Affinity_White_Horiz_250.png
159 ms
5-years-w3.webp
160 ms
NephBastRitchieMockup.png
155 ms
SteggSupMockup.png
155 ms
GoogleLogo_v2.png
154 ms
FiveStars.png
150 ms
ClutchLogov2.png
148 ms
GooglePartner_v2.png
148 ms
ShopifyPlusPartner_v2.png
147 ms
ActiveCampaignPartner_v2.png
119 ms
Expertise2022.png
117 ms
Advertising_Marketing_Agencies_2020_v2.png
119 ms
Digital_Marketing_Agencies_2020_v2.png
115 ms
BestInSearchv2.png
114 ms
PPC_Agencies_2020V2.png
114 ms
CorpVisionAwardsV2.png
116 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
209 ms
icomoon.woff
50 ms
HomepageHeroResized_Optimize.jpg
33 ms
Homepage_MidSectionBG_Optimize.jpg
31 ms
Mattress-Outlet-Case-Study-2.jpg
30 ms
Stegmann_FrontPagePort.jpg
31 ms
HarvestTimb_FrontPagePort.jpg
32 ms
webdesign-company-1.jpg
33 ms
w3affinity.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
w3affinity.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
w3affinity.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise W3affinity.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that W3affinity.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
w3affinity.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of W3 Affinity. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: