3.5 sec in total
125 ms
2.8 sec
562 ms
Click here to check amazing WACD content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about wacd.org
Visit wacd.orgWe analyzed Wacd.org page load time and found that the first response time was 125 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
wacd.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value16.2 s
0/100
10%
Value25.4 s
0/100
25%
Value18.9 s
0/100
10%
Value690 ms
43/100
30%
Value0.073
96/100
15%
Value25.2 s
0/100
10%
125 ms
433 ms
40 ms
56 ms
63 ms
Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Wacd.org, 34% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 23% (10 requests) were made to Streamline.imgix.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Streamline.imgix.net.
Page size can be reduced by 577.6 kB (19%)
3.0 MB
2.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Wacd.org main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 63.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.3 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. WACD images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 492.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 492.3 kB or 23% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 21.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wacd.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 21.9 kB or 27% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (48%)
27
14
The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of WACD. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
wacd.org
125 ms
www.wadistricts.org
433 ms
css
40 ms
css2
56 ms
css2
63 ms
application-6312ed9ea2f513a2d300781ddb125b03eb3d48b80fea6986a97bc6e8a6f0b448.css
186 ms
acme.css
270 ms
application-daa36f2c48897a00decfb18e4ef6151564323c6a9b2ad67e0708359d56706df6.js
463 ms
api.js
49 ms
api.js
73 ms
acme.js
311 ms
public-0f3aae69cad3c6560c0b.js
772 ms
notAdmin-fc65e0448c366decfe9eaa7c0b863062e0b3ce14438b4a8275e61ab141886995.js
329 ms
v2.js
75 ms
element.js
60 ms
css2
22 ms
recaptcha__en.js
36 ms
WACD-1024px.png
58 ms
49133402857_c4cbe998f6_k.jpg
529 ms
50775823776_9829c063f8_k.jpg
118 ms
staff-white.png
530 ms
book-19-512%20(1).png
534 ms
grass-512.png
890 ms
board-white.png
533 ms
meetings-white.png
802 ms
8665647_phone_flip_icon.png
534 ms
Lifting%20Crew%2012.13.23.jpeg
1119 ms
Capitol_building-20200124-JDorner-min.jpg
538 ms
20230208_113404%20(1).jpeg
601 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHvxk.ttf
32 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USew8.ttf
43 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVew8.ttf
48 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaooCP.ttf
60 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf
48 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoooCP.ttf
59 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEooCP.ttf
79 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf
48 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaooCP.ttf
59 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao4CP.ttf
60 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpYCP.ttf
66 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pYCP.ttf
66 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf
65 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapYCP.ttf
65 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpYCP.ttf
66 ms
wacd.org accessibility score
wacd.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
wacd.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wacd.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wacd.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wacd.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of WACD. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: