7.1 sec in total
294 ms
5.2 sec
1.7 sec
Visit wachter.com now to see the best up-to-date Wachter content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about wachter.com
From retail to industrial, healthcare to finance, Wachter enables business transformation via technology integration. See our many technology services.
Visit wachter.comWe analyzed Wachter.com page load time and found that the first response time was 294 ms and then it took 6.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
wachter.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
37/100
10%
Value6.3 s
10/100
25%
Value6.0 s
46/100
10%
Value270 ms
82/100
30%
Value0.867
4/100
15%
Value7.5 s
48/100
10%
294 ms
243 ms
141 ms
58 ms
210 ms
Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Wachter.com, 19% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) relates to the external source Js.hs-scripts.com.
Page size can be reduced by 94.8 kB (50%)
189.2 kB
94.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Wachter.com main page is 189.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 109.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 94.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 94.4 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 122 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wachter images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 32 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 220 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wachter.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 220 B or 16% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (68%)
22
7
The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wachter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
wachter.com
294 ms
wachter.com
243 ms
www.wachter.com
141 ms
jquery-1.11.2.js
58 ms
css2
210 ms
pwr.min.css
263 ms
custom-styles.min.css
365 ms
current.js
176 ms
pwr.min.js
358 ms
project.js
204 ms
project.js
329 ms
Typewriter.min.js
671 ms
Isotope.min.js
854 ms
Packery.min.js
1424 ms
2331978.js
663 ms
index.js
662 ms
gtm.js
1134 ms
6b530dd6-8bf2-47bf-bd7d-bb4664aa0ef2.png
1039 ms
WachterLogo-Gradient-Horiz-svg.svg
760 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fMZg.ttf
204 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfMZg.ttf
2415 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYMZg.ttf
2415 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1s.ttf
2418 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1s.ttf
2418 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJA.ttf
2419 ms
4537.js
2474 ms
2331978.js
2503 ms
Banner%20Image.jpg
231 ms
2331978.js
321 ms
leadflows.js
229 ms
fb.js
193 ms
2331978.js
227 ms
wachter.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
wachter.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
wachter.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wachter.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wachter.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wachter.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Wachter. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: