Tools & Wizards About Us
walkercraneandrigging.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

walkercraneandrigging.com

Walker Crane

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

111 ms

Resources Loaded

670 ms

Page Rendered

922 ms

walkercraneandrigging.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to walkercraneandrigging.com homepage info - get ready to check Walker Crane Andrigging best content right away, or after learning these important things about walkercraneandrigging.com

Visit walkercraneandrigging.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Walkercraneandrigging.com page load time and found that the first response time was 111 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

walkercraneandrigging.com performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

28/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.5 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value230 ms

86/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.299

40/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.8 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

walkercrane.com

111 ms

walkercrane.com

139 ms

formidableforms.css

60 ms

bdt-uikit.css

84 ms

ep-helper.css

71 ms

Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Walkercraneandrigging.com, 25% (20 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (222 ms) relates to the external source Walkercrane.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 451.3 kB (15%)

Content Size

3.1 MB

After Optimization

2.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Walkercraneandrigging.com main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 113.3 kB

  • Original 156.7 kB
  • After minification 153.3 kB
  • After compression 43.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 113.3 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 111.4 kB

  • Original 2.3 MB
  • After minification 2.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Walker Crane Andrigging images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 66.5 kB

  • Original 267.6 kB
  • After minification 267.6 kB
  • After compression 201.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 66.5 kB or 25% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-52%

Potential reduce by 160.1 kB

  • Original 310.5 kB
  • After minification 310.3 kB
  • After compression 150.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Walkercraneandrigging.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 160.1 kB or 52% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (64%)

Requests Now

58

After Optimization

21

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Walker Crane Andrigging. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

walkercrane.com

walkercrane.com

111 ms

walkercrane.com

walkercrane.com

139 ms

formidableforms.css

formidableforms.css

60 ms

bdt-uikit.css

bdt-uikit.css

84 ms

ep-helper.css

ep-helper.css

71 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

66 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

67 ms

header-footer.min.css

header-footer.min.css

68 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

91 ms

post-5.css

post-5.css

90 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

88 ms

e-swiper.min.css

e-swiper.min.css

89 ms

ep-styles.css

ep-styles.css

140 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

108 ms

widget-heading.min.css

widget-heading.min.css

122 ms

widget-text-editor.min.css

widget-text-editor.min.css

109 ms

widget-image.min.css

widget-image.min.css

112 ms

widget-icon-box.min.css

widget-icon-box.min.css

120 ms

post-2.css

post-2.css

160 ms

post-35.css

post-35.css

136 ms

post-69.css

post-69.css

137 ms

css

css

36 ms

ep-context-menu.css

ep-context-menu.css

160 ms

widget-icon-list.min.css

widget-icon-list.min.css

159 ms

hello-frontend.min.js

hello-frontend.min.js

171 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

171 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

173 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

172 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

184 ms

bdt-uikit.min.js

bdt-uikit.min.js

185 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

184 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

185 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

187 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

185 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

186 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

199 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

199 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

202 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

200 ms

plus-section-column-link.min.js

plus-section-column-link.min.js

170 ms

ep-scripts.js

ep-scripts.js

222 ms

logo4-2.png

logo4-2.png

50 ms

slide_img1.jpg

slide_img1.jpg

170 ms

img1.jpg

img1.jpg

101 ms

img3.jpg

img3.jpg

114 ms

img_1.jpg

img_1.jpg

114 ms

img_2.jpg

img_2.jpg

115 ms

img4.jpg

img4.jpg

115 ms

img5.jpg

img5.jpg

127 ms

user1.jpg

user1.jpg

116 ms

user2.jpg

user2.jpg

116 ms

user3.jpg

user3.jpg

122 ms

clogo1.jpg

clogo1.jpg

124 ms

clogo2.jpg

clogo2.jpg

123 ms

clogo3.jpg

clogo3.jpg

125 ms

clogo4.jpg

clogo4.jpg

129 ms

clogo5.jpg

clogo5.jpg

136 ms

clogo6.jpg

clogo6.jpg

153 ms

clogo7.jpg

clogo7.jpg

141 ms

logo.png

logo.png

140 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

21 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVc.ttf

52 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

52 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

52 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

38 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

54 ms

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCjC3jsGyI.ttf

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCjC3jsGyI.ttf

56 ms

4iCs6KVjbNBYlgoKfw7z.ttf

4iCs6KVjbNBYlgoKfw7z.ttf

53 ms

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoC1CzjsGyI.ttf

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoC1CzjsGyI.ttf

55 ms

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCxCvjsGyI.ttf

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCxCvjsGyI.ttf

54 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexQ.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexQ.ttf

53 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk_RkWVAexQ.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk_RkWVAexQ.ttf

55 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkWVAexQ.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkWVAexQ.ttf

70 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjWVAexQ.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjWVAexQ.ttf

57 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWVAexQ.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWVAexQ.ttf

56 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk0ZjWVAexQ.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk0ZjWVAexQ.ttf

55 ms

4iCp6KVjbNBYlgoKejYHtFyPN4Q.ttf

4iCp6KVjbNBYlgoKejYHtFyPN4Q.ttf

69 ms

4iCu6KVjbNBYlgoKej70l0w.ttf

4iCu6KVjbNBYlgoKej70l0w.ttf

69 ms

4iCp6KVjbNBYlgoKejZftVyPN4Q.ttf

4iCp6KVjbNBYlgoKejZftVyPN4Q.ttf

70 ms

4iCp6KVjbNBYlgoKejZPslyPN4Q.ttf

4iCp6KVjbNBYlgoKejZPslyPN4Q.ttf

70 ms

Accessibility Review

walkercraneandrigging.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

walkercraneandrigging.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

walkercraneandrigging.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Walkercraneandrigging.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Walkercraneandrigging.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

walkercraneandrigging.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Walker Crane Andrigging. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: