Report Summary

  • 92

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    92% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 48% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 88

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

walletpop.com

walletpop.com

Page Load Speed

158.3 sec in total

First Response

291 ms

Resources Loaded

106 sec

Page Rendered

52 sec

walletpop.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Walletpop content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about walletpop.com

The search engine that helps you find exactly what you're looking for. Find the most relevant information, video, images, and answers from all across the Web.

Visit walletpop.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Walletpop.com page load time and found that the first response time was 291 ms and then it took 158 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 39 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

walletpop.com performance score

92

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

64/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

84/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.6 s

97/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.034

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.6 s

98/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

walletpop.com

291 ms

378 ms

519 ms

application.css

2211 ms

finance-grid.css

2692 ms

Our browser made a total of 118 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Walletpop.com, 15% (18 requests) were made to O.aolcdn.com and 9% (11 requests) were made to S.aolcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (50.7 sec) relates to the external source S.skimresources.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 825.9 kB (55%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

664.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Walletpop.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 642.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 394.0 kB

  • Original 451.4 kB
  • After minification 444.2 kB
  • After compression 57.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 394.0 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 6.2 kB

  • Original 383.9 kB
  • After minification 377.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Walletpop images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 415.1 kB

  • Original 642.1 kB
  • After minification 638.1 kB
  • After compression 227.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 415.1 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 10.6 kB

  • Original 13.2 kB
  • After minification 13.0 kB
  • After compression 2.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Walletpop.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.6 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (63%)

Requests Now

72

After Optimization

27

The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Walletpop. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

walletpop.com accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[role]s do not have all required [aria-*] attributes

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

walletpop.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

walletpop.com SEO score

88

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Walletpop.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Walletpop.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Walletpop. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: