Tools & Wizards About Us
warefencing.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

warefencing.com

Ware Fencing LLC | Fence installation

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

85 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

62 ms

warefencing.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ware Fencing content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about warefencing.com

Welcome to Ware Fencing LLC! We offer a wide range of residential and commercial fencing services, with descriptions, images, and testimonials. Our skilled team ensures exceptional craftsmanship and o...

Visit warefencing.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Warefencing.com page load time and found that the first response time was 85 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

warefencing.com performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

48/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.8 s

15/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value760 ms

38/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.033

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.4 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.warefencing.com

85 ms

minified.js

36 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

32 ms

polyfill.min.js

33 ms

thunderbolt-commons.e7839053.bundle.min.js

108 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Warefencing.com, 39% (12 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 39% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (279 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 397.4 kB (51%)

Content Size

784.1 kB

After Optimization

386.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Warefencing.com main page is 784.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 496.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 391.8 kB

  • Original 496.8 kB
  • After minification 495.2 kB
  • After compression 105.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 391.8 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 2.0 kB

  • Original 27.5 kB
  • After minification 25.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ware Fencing images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 259.8 kB
  • After minification 259.8 kB
  • After compression 256.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (56%)

Requests Now

18

After Optimization

8

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ware Fencing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.warefencing.com

www.warefencing.com

85 ms

minified.js

minified.js

36 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

32 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

33 ms

thunderbolt-commons.e7839053.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.e7839053.bundle.min.js

108 ms

main.760485a2.bundle.min.js

main.760485a2.bundle.min.js

108 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

22 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

108 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

104 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

108 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

122 ms

jhjhvhjvj.png

jhjhvhjvj.png

279 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

58 ms

ea2512_d4e173f74bcb450d936ab4c2f7a59da7~mv2.jpg

ea2512_d4e173f74bcb450d936ab4c2f7a59da7~mv2.jpg

261 ms

ea2512_b2ef24a59e494a0992784d1a408c70e0~mv2.jpg

ea2512_b2ef24a59e494a0992784d1a408c70e0~mv2.jpg

278 ms

98 ms

93 ms

97 ms

96 ms

92 ms

94 ms

127 ms

130 ms

129 ms

128 ms

128 ms

127 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

6 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

14 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

9 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

6 ms

Accessibility Review

warefencing.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

warefencing.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

warefencing.com SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Warefencing.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Warefencing.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

warefencing.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ware Fencing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: