Tools & Wizards About Us
warpconduit.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

warpconduit.net

Web Design & Development Tips Tutorials - WarpConduit Computing

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

123 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

799 ms

warpconduit.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to warpconduit.net homepage info - get ready to check Warp Conduit best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about warpconduit.net

Web Design & Development tips, tutorials, videos and more at WarpConduit.Net. Get yourself some intergalactic brain food!

Visit warpconduit.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Warpconduit.net page load time and found that the first response time was 123 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

warpconduit.net performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

14/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

20/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.5 s

27/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,910 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.008

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.5 s

18/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

warpconduit.net

123 ms

www.warpconduit.net

337 ms

default.include.b789c7.css

85 ms

default.include.006cf0.js

90 ms

webfont.js

107 ms

Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 8% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Warpconduit.net, 31% (11 requests) were made to D3qpxhs44jx97p.cloudfront.net and 11% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (352 ms) relates to the external source D3qpxhs44jx97p.cloudfront.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 150.2 kB (42%)

Content Size

355.5 kB

After Optimization

205.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Warpconduit.net main page is 355.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 171.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 92.4 kB

  • Original 109.1 kB
  • After minification 104.7 kB
  • After compression 16.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 92.4 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 16.1 kB

  • Original 171.6 kB
  • After minification 155.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Warp Conduit images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-48%

Potential reduce by 27.2 kB

  • Original 56.5 kB
  • After minification 56.4 kB
  • After compression 29.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 27.2 kB or 48% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 14.4 kB

  • Original 18.3 kB
  • After minification 18.2 kB
  • After compression 3.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Warpconduit.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 14.4 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (41%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Warp Conduit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

warpconduit.net

warpconduit.net

123 ms

www.warpconduit.net

www.warpconduit.net

337 ms

default.include.b789c7.css

default.include.b789c7.css

85 ms

default.include.006cf0.js

default.include.006cf0.js

90 ms

webfont.js

webfont.js

107 ms

00522a6786c8b5fbd5ef.js

00522a6786c8b5fbd5ef.js

120 ms

9944ac0b483148216349.js

9944ac0b483148216349.js

118 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

74 ms

default.include-footer.b805f0.js

default.include-footer.b805f0.js

76 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

78 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

24 ms

logo.png

logo.png

16 ms

bb-customize-head-code.png

bb-customize-head-code.png

15 ms

bb-customize-headings-300x169.png

bb-customize-headings-300x169.png

15 ms

bb-page-builder-heading-300x192.png

bb-page-builder-heading-300x192.png

14 ms

custom-dashboard-widget-01-215x300.jpg

custom-dashboard-widget-01-215x300.jpg

352 ms

custom-dashboard-widget-02-232x300.jpg

custom-dashboard-widget-02-232x300.jpg

46 ms

embed-7346e9a735aaeeacede51d1efaad6208f95d9edbc222155878bfddc2da28fa87.css

embed-7346e9a735aaeeacede51d1efaad6208f95d9edbc222155878bfddc2da28fa87.css

108 ms

collect

collect

13 ms

ssi-icomoon.woff

ssi-icomoon.woff

22 ms

ca-pub-5566338661644938.js

ca-pub-5566338661644938.js

61 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

128 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

127 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

160 ms

ads

ads

310 ms

osd.js

osd.js

14 ms

ads

ads

296 ms

2764.png

2764.png

182 ms

m_js_controller.js

m_js_controller.js

28 ms

abg.js

abg.js

50 ms

favicon

favicon

65 ms

favicon

favicon

68 ms

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

53 ms

nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png

nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png

45 ms

s

s

33 ms

x_button_blue2.png

x_button_blue2.png

11 ms

Accessibility Review

warpconduit.net accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

warpconduit.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

warpconduit.net SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Warpconduit.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Warpconduit.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

warpconduit.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Warp Conduit. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: