Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    42% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 75% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

wastewrap.org

Home - Des Moines County Regional Solid Waste Commission

Page Load Speed

989 ms in total

First Response

29 ms

Resources Loaded

886 ms

Page Rendered

74 ms

wastewrap.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to wastewrap.org homepage info - get ready to check Waste Wrap best content right away, or after learning these important things about wastewrap.org

Des Moines County Regional Solid Waste Commission environmentally sound, fiscally responsible Contact Us Who are we? (319) 753-8126 OR (800) 216-8126 We Make Recycling Easy Established in October 1990...

Visit wastewrap.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Wastewrap.org page load time and found that the first response time was 29 ms and then it took 960 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wastewrap.org performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value14.1 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value26.3 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,000 ms

27/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.9 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

wastewrap.org

29 ms

dmcwaste.org

846 ms

Our browser made a total of 2 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Wastewrap.org, 50% (1 request) were made to Dmcwaste.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (846 ms) relates to the external source Dmcwaste.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.5 kB (61%)

Content Size

2.5 kB

After Optimization

996 B

In fact, the total size of Wastewrap.org main page is 2.5 kB. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 2.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 2.5 kB
  • After minification 2.5 kB
  • After compression 996 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.5 kB or 61% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

0

After Optimization

0

Besides the initial HTML request, no CSS, Javascripts, AJAX or image files were requested in the course of web page rendering.

Accessibility Review

wastewrap.org accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

wastewrap.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

wastewrap.org SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wastewrap.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Wastewrap.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Waste Wrap. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: