1.5 sec in total
72 ms
597 ms
829 ms
Click here to check amazing Watermark content for Mexico. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about watermark.ws
Protect your photos with custom watermarks. Save watermarks as templates for later use. Watermark animated GIFs, preserving all layers of animation. Batch process and watermark many files at once.
Visit watermark.wsWe analyzed Watermark.ws page load time and found that the first response time was 72 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
watermark.ws performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.7 s
93/100
10%
Value3.5 s
65/100
25%
Value1.7 s
100/100
10%
Value640 ms
47/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value5.8 s
67/100
10%
72 ms
44 ms
6 ms
445 ms
3 ms
Our browser made a total of 11 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Watermark.ws, 9% (1 request) were made to Cdn.segment.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (445 ms) relates to the external source Cdn.segment.com.
Page size can be reduced by 42.7 kB (44%)
97.0 kB
54.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Watermark.ws main page is 97.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 58.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 42.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.7 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.
We found no issues to fix!
4
4
The browser has sent 4 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Watermark. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
watermark.ws
72 ms
watermark.ws
44 ms
app.css
6 ms
analytics.min.js
445 ms
bg-landscape.svg
3 ms
bg-cover-waves.svg
4 ms
proximanova-regular-webfont.woff
1 ms
proximanova-semibold-webfont.woff
15 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
20 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
20 ms
fa-light-300.woff
21 ms
watermark.ws accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
watermark.ws best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Page has valid source maps
watermark.ws SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Watermark.ws can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Watermark.ws main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
watermark.ws
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Watermark. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: