Tools & Wizards About Us
watermarkpros.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

watermarkpros.com

Watermark Pros | Pool tile cleaning, stone sealing & plaster services in Austin, TX. Watermark Pros swimming pool surface renovation & calcium & scale...

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

559 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

282 ms

watermarkpros.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to watermarkpros.com homepage info - get ready to check Watermark Pros best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about watermarkpros.com

Swimming pool surface restoration and remodeling specialists in tile cleaning, swimming pool plastering and stone deck cleaning and sealing in Austin, Texas.

Visit watermarkpros.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Watermarkpros.com page load time and found that the first response time was 559 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

watermarkpros.com performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value32.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.4 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,300 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.166

71/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.7 s

22/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

watermarkpros.com

559 ms

bootstrap.min.css

107 ms

font-awesome.min.css

76 ms

animate.css

79 ms

icons.min.css

83 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Watermarkpros.com, 6% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (571 ms) belongs to the original domain Watermarkpros.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 222.5 kB (5%)

Content Size

4.9 MB

After Optimization

4.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Watermarkpros.com main page is 4.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 29.9 kB

  • Original 36.3 kB
  • After minification 32.9 kB
  • After compression 6.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.9 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 137.7 kB

  • Original 4.6 MB
  • After minification 4.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Watermark Pros images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 27.6 kB

  • Original 165.5 kB
  • After minification 165.3 kB
  • After compression 137.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 27.6 kB or 17% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 27.3 kB

  • Original 96.2 kB
  • After minification 96.2 kB
  • After compression 68.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Watermarkpros.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 27.3 kB or 28% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (58%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

18

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Watermark Pros. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

watermarkpros.com

watermarkpros.com

559 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

107 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

76 ms

animate.css

animate.css

79 ms

icons.min.css

icons.min.css

83 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

72 ms

jquery.fancybox-thumbs.css

jquery.fancybox-thumbs.css

103 ms

watermark.css

watermark.css

191 ms

select2.css

select2.css

186 ms

style.css

style.css

158 ms

settings.css

settings.css

159 ms

style-revolution-slider.css

style-revolution-slider.css

188 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

243 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

241 ms

parsley.js

parsley.js

245 ms

jquery.fancybox.js

jquery.fancybox.js

241 ms

jquery.fancybox-media.js

jquery.fancybox-media.js

242 ms

jquery.mixitup.min.js

jquery.mixitup.min.js

243 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

382 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

237 ms

revo-slider-init.js

revo-slider-init.js

249 ms

rrssb.min.js

rrssb.min.js

249 ms

admin_water.js

admin_water.js

374 ms

watermark.js

watermark.js

372 ms

css

css

72 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

17 ms

logo.png

logo.png

199 ms

HomeA_500.jpg

HomeA_500.jpg

540 ms

HomeB_500.jpg

HomeB_500.jpg

204 ms

HomeC_500.jpg

HomeC_500.jpg

515 ms

HomeD_500.jpg

HomeD_500.jpg

513 ms

HomeE_500.jpg

HomeE_500.jpg

510 ms

HomeF_500.jpg

HomeF_500.jpg

515 ms

HomeG_500.jpg

HomeG_500.jpg

547 ms

HomeH_500.jpg

HomeH_500.jpg

571 ms

timer.png

timer.png

569 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

398 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff

371 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw.woff

395 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

395 ms

TrajanProRegular.woff

TrajanProRegular.woff

380 ms

S6u8w4BMUTPHjxsAXC-s.woff

S6u8w4BMUTPHjxsAXC-s.woff

378 ms

ga.js

ga.js

349 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

278 ms

shadow1.png

shadow1.png

276 ms

bullet_blue.png

bullet_blue.png

278 ms

large_blue_left.png

large_blue_left.png

279 ms

large_blue_right.png

large_blue_right.png

279 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

35 ms

collect

collect

41 ms

Accessibility Review

watermarkpros.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

watermarkpros.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

watermarkpros.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Watermarkpros.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Watermarkpros.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

watermarkpros.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Watermark Pros. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: