Tools & Wizards About Us
watermarkup.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 87

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

watermarkup.com

Watermark 150 - 200 Photos in Minutes

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

22 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

695 ms

watermarkup.com screenshot

About Website

Visit watermarkup.com now to see the best up-to-date Watermark Up content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about watermarkup.com

Watermark 150 - 200 Photos in Minutes Without Losing Image Quality.

Visit watermarkup.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Watermarkup.com page load time and found that the first response time was 22 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

watermarkup.com performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

76/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

24/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.9 s

48/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,260 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.9 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

watermarkup.com

22 ms

watermarkup.com

301 ms

js

93 ms

css

54 ms

core.min.css

301 ms

Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Watermarkup.com, 9% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Watermarkup.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 62.2 kB (2%)

Content Size

2.7 MB

After Optimization

2.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Watermarkup.com main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 37.6 kB

  • Original 45.2 kB
  • After minification 36.9 kB
  • After compression 7.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.3 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.6 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 23.6 kB

  • Original 2.5 MB
  • After minification 2.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Watermark Up images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.0 kB

  • Original 220.3 kB
  • After minification 220.3 kB
  • After compression 219.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (27%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

30

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Watermark Up. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

watermarkup.com

watermarkup.com

22 ms

watermarkup.com

watermarkup.com

301 ms

js

js

93 ms

css

css

54 ms

core.min.css

core.min.css

301 ms

skin.css

skin.css

319 ms

ionicons.min.css

ionicons.min.css

336 ms

logo-dark.png

logo-dark.png

323 ms

logo.png

logo.png

295 ms

jquery-3.2.1.min.js

jquery-3.2.1.min.js

315 ms

timber.master.min.js

timber.master.min.js

602 ms

registration.js

registration.js

644 ms

index.js

index.js

567 ms

api.js

api.js

51 ms

vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015

vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015

55 ms

appsumo.png

appsumo.png

592 ms

alternativeto.png

alternativeto.png

592 ms

ph-logo-1.png

ph-logo-1.png

690 ms

SaaSHub.png

SaaSHub.png

889 ms

la-sexta.png

la-sexta.png

887 ms

g2%20logo.png

g2%20logo.png

895 ms

G2_logo.png

G2_logo.png

888 ms

g2_recognition.png

g2_recognition.png

890 ms

appsumo_review_1.png

appsumo_review_1.png

891 ms

appsumo_review_2.png

appsumo_review_2.png

1181 ms

appsumo_review_3.png

appsumo_review_3.png

1132 ms

appsumo_review_4.png

appsumo_review_4.png

1173 ms

G2_rating_5.png

G2_rating_5.png

1170 ms

la-sexta-3.png

la-sexta-3.png

1159 ms

tekcrispy.jpg

tekcrispy.jpg

1182 ms

photo_1.jpg

photo_1.jpg

1417 ms

photo10.jpg

photo10.jpg

1489 ms

hero-2-4.jpg

hero-2-4.jpg

1084 ms

slide-5-fw@2x.jpg

slide-5-fw@2x.jpg

1063 ms

hero-half-4@.jpg

hero-half-4@.jpg

1064 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxM.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxM.woff

18 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc-.woff

49 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc-.woff

73 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc-.woff

74 ms

f0Xx0e2p98ZvDXdZQIOcpqjX-IcE.woff

f0Xx0e2p98ZvDXdZQIOcpqjX-IcE.woff

105 ms

f0Xu0e2p98ZvDXdZQIOcpqjfBaQXcMEv.woff

f0Xu0e2p98ZvDXdZQIOcpqjfBaQXcMEv.woff

72 ms

entypo.woff

entypo.woff

1122 ms

ionicons.ttf

ionicons.ttf

1495 ms

404

404

1126 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

157 ms

404

404

853 ms

404

404

652 ms

404

404

680 ms

404

404

469 ms

404

404

733 ms

404

404

250 ms

404

404

324 ms

main.js

main.js

262 ms

appsumo_review_1.png

appsumo_review_1.png

267 ms

appsumo_review_4.png

appsumo_review_4.png

216 ms

appsumo.png

appsumo.png

156 ms

g2_recognition.png

g2_recognition.png

161 ms

404

404

106 ms

appsumo_review_3.png

appsumo_review_3.png

93 ms

404

404

90 ms

404

404

87 ms

404

404

104 ms

404

404

99 ms

appsumo_review_2.png

appsumo_review_2.png

103 ms

404

404

81 ms

Accessibility Review

watermarkup.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

watermarkup.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

watermarkup.com SEO score

87

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Watermarkup.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Watermarkup.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

watermarkup.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Watermark Up. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: