Tools & Wizards About Us
waterproofing.ooo screenshot

Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    41% of other websites

  • 69

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 34% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

waterproofing.ooo

Waterproofing Contractors in Bangalore, Mysore, Hyderabad, Telangana, AP

Page Load Speed

13.7 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

11.5 sec

Page Rendered

1 sec

waterproofing.ooo screenshot

About Website

Visit waterproofing.ooo now to see the best up-to-date Waterproofing content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about waterproofing.ooo

Waterproofing company in Bangalore, Hyderabad, Mysore, Karnataka, Telangana, AP for Basement, Bathroom, Roof, Slab, Swimming Pool, Terrace, Water Tank, Grouting.

Visit waterproofing.ooo

Key Findings

We analyzed Waterproofing.ooo page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 12.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

waterproofing.ooo performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.0 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value930 ms

30/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.146

77/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.0 s

21/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

waterproofing.ooo

1213 ms

2sbu8.css

931 ms

9jbb1.css

1156 ms

css

63 ms

css

76 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Waterproofing.ooo, 8% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Waterproofing.ooo.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 128.7 kB (12%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

951.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Waterproofing.ooo main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 627.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 100.8 kB

  • Original 122.7 kB
  • After minification 116.2 kB
  • After compression 21.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 100.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 16.7 kB

  • Original 627.4 kB
  • After minification 610.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Waterproofing images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 7.8 kB

  • Original 167.2 kB
  • After minification 167.2 kB
  • After compression 159.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 3.3 kB

  • Original 162.8 kB
  • After minification 162.8 kB
  • After compression 159.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Waterproofing.ooo has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (89%)

Requests Now

57

After Optimization

6

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Waterproofing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

waterproofing.ooo

waterproofing.ooo

1213 ms

2sbu8.css

2sbu8.css

931 ms

9jbb1.css

9jbb1.css

1156 ms

css

css

63 ms

css

css

76 ms

60n2x.css

60n2x.css

1307 ms

css

css

78 ms

h8s88.css

h8s88.css

721 ms

h8s88.js

h8s88.js

1641 ms

css

css

80 ms

css

css

76 ms

9jbb1.css

9jbb1.css

728 ms

quform.js

quform.js

2334 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

2333 ms

widget.min.js

widget.min.js

2017 ms

mouse.min.js

mouse.min.js

2424 ms

sortable.min.js

sortable.min.js

2585 ms

tabs.min.js

tabs.min.js

2587 ms

accordion.min.js

accordion.min.js

2811 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

3298 ms

menu.js

menu.js

2844 ms

animations.min.js

animations.min.js

3050 ms

jplayer.min.js

jplayer.min.js

3275 ms

translate3d.js

translate3d.js

3281 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

3524 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

3697 ms

info-box.min.js

info-box.min.js

3758 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

3967 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

3966 ms

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

3997 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

4225 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.min.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.min.js

4378 ms

logo-new2.png

logo-new2.png

3136 ms

logo-sticky.png

logo-sticky.png

3347 ms

plumber.png

plumber.png

3367 ms

transparent.png

transparent.png

3365 ms

withoutbg4.png

withoutbg4.png

4049 ms

terrace-water-proofing.jpg

terrace-water-proofing.jpg

3832 ms

watertank-proofing.jpg

watertank-proofing.jpg

4291 ms

basement-waterproofing.jpg

basement-waterproofing.jpg

4237 ms

roof.jpg

roof.jpg

4248 ms

crack-filling.jpg

crack-filling.jpg

4504 ms

swimming-pool-waterproofing.jpg

swimming-pool-waterproofing.jpg

4940 ms

grouting.jpg

grouting.jpg

5184 ms

bathroom.jpg

bathroom.jpg

5143 ms

slab.jpg

slab.jpg

5152 ms

wp1-450x300.jpg

wp1-450x300.jpg

5174 ms

waterseepage1-450x300.jpg

waterseepage1-450x300.jpg

5351 ms

mfn-icons.woff

mfn-icons.woff

5881 ms

waterseepage2-450x300.jpg

waterseepage2-450x300.jpg

5443 ms

waterseepage3-450x300.jpg

waterseepage3-450x300.jpg

5386 ms

waterseepage4-450x300.jpg

waterseepage4-450x300.jpg

5243 ms

waterseepage5-450x300.jpg

waterseepage5-450x300.jpg

5244 ms

wp2-450x300.jpg

wp2-450x300.jpg

5679 ms

wp3-450x300.jpg

wp3-450x300.jpg

5887 ms

wbg.jpg

wbg.jpg

6076 ms

home_plumber_section_footer.png

home_plumber_section_footer.png

5434 ms

box_shadow.png

box_shadow.png

5249 ms

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

3797 ms

Accessibility Review

waterproofing.ooo accessibility score

69

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

waterproofing.ooo best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

waterproofing.ooo SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Waterproofing.ooo can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Waterproofing.ooo main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

waterproofing.ooo

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Waterproofing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: