Tools & Wizards About Us
waterscapetech.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

waterscapetech.com

SMART Web Design & Digital Marketing Services-WaterscapeTech

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

52 ms

Resources Loaded

3.6 sec

Page Rendered

177 ms

waterscapetech.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to waterscapetech.com homepage info - get ready to check Waterscape Tech best content right away, or after learning these important things about waterscapetech.com

Premium Web Design, Graphic Design, SEO & Digital Marketing For Less! Visit us here and learn why we are the SMART choice!

Visit waterscapetech.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Waterscapetech.com page load time and found that the first response time was 52 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

waterscapetech.com performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

44/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.3 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,480 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.102

89/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.0 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

waterscapetech.com

52 ms

www.waterscapetech.com

83 ms

wp_head.css

22 ms

js

162 ms

js

211 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 29% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Waterscapetech.com, 43% (24 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 11% (6 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (214 ms) relates to the external source Clarity.ms.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 176.9 kB (26%)

Content Size

687.4 kB

After Optimization

510.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Waterscapetech.com main page is 687.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 276.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 171.4 kB

  • Original 203.8 kB
  • After minification 201.5 kB
  • After compression 32.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 171.4 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 130.0 kB
  • After minification 130.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Waterscape Tech images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.5 kB

  • Original 276.8 kB
  • After minification 276.7 kB
  • After compression 273.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 2.0 kB

  • Original 76.9 kB
  • After minification 74.9 kB
  • After compression 74.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Waterscapetech.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (50%)

Requests Now

28

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Waterscape Tech. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

waterscapetech.com

waterscapetech.com

52 ms

www.waterscapetech.com

www.waterscapetech.com

83 ms

wp_head.css

wp_head.css

22 ms

js

js

162 ms

js

js

211 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

29 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

35 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

26 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

31 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

32 ms

common.js

common.js

26 ms

9pspnuhx8w

9pspnuhx8w

214 ms

Gr272ltbLLU

Gr272ltbLLU

154 ms

waterscapetech.webdesign-marketing-myrtle-beach-sc.png

waterscapetech.webdesign-marketing-myrtle-beach-sc.png

140 ms

HomepageImage01_Waterscape_2021.jpg

HomepageImage01_Waterscape_2021.jpg

141 ms

VideoCover01_WaterscapeTech.jpg

VideoCover01_WaterscapeTech.jpg

140 ms

MobileReady_WaterscapeTech.jpg

MobileReady_WaterscapeTech.jpg

140 ms

Gr272ltbLLU

Gr272ltbLLU

70 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w3aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w3aXw.woff

53 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w3aX8.ttf

58 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aXw.woff

57 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aX8.ttf

57 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w3aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w3aXw.woff

59 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w3aX8.ttf

58 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w3aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w3aXw.woff

62 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w3aX8.ttf

62 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw3aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw3aXw.woff

62 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw3aX8.ttf

66 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aXw.woff

67 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aX8.ttf

66 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw3aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw3aXw.woff

68 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw3aX8.ttf

68 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw3aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw3aXw.woff

67 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw3aX8.ttf

68 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw3aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw3aXw.woff

94 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw3aX8.ttf

96 ms

YA9Kr0yU4l_XOrogbkun3kQQtamlrvQ.woff

YA9Kr0yU4l_XOrogbkun3kQQtamlrvQ.woff

96 ms

YA9Kr0yU4l_XOrogbkun3kQQtamlrvc.ttf

YA9Kr0yU4l_XOrogbkun3kQQtamlrvc.ttf

94 ms

YA9Ur0yU4l_XOrogbkun3kQQvpmv.woff

YA9Ur0yU4l_XOrogbkun3kQQvpmv.woff

95 ms

YA9Ur0yU4l_XOrogbkun3kQQvpms.ttf

YA9Ur0yU4l_XOrogbkun3kQQvpms.ttf

96 ms

modules.woff

modules.woff

46 ms

clarity.js

clarity.js

77 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

49 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

65 ms

base.js

base.js

92 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

125 ms

aDz_T_gaBrysQcZbaYaX8h92PYnkBHHJotKz2yKPZZ4.js

aDz_T_gaBrysQcZbaYaX8h92PYnkBHHJotKz2yKPZZ4.js

101 ms

embed.js

embed.js

32 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

26 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

26 ms

id

id

12 ms

Create

Create

82 ms

GenerateIT

GenerateIT

16 ms

www.waterscapetech.com

www.waterscapetech.com

29 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

13 ms

c.gif

c.gif

7 ms

Accessibility Review

waterscapetech.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

waterscapetech.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

waterscapetech.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Waterscapetech.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Waterscapetech.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

waterscapetech.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Waterscape Tech. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: