1 sec in total
82 ms
859 ms
68 ms
Welcome to waterstation.technology homepage info - get ready to check Water Station best content right away, or after learning these important things about waterstation.technology
Our line of self-serve WaterStations purify water to the highest standard and percolate it through a series of natural minerals to create a virtual spring water
Visit waterstation.technologyWe analyzed Waterstation.technology page load time and found that the first response time was 82 ms and then it took 927 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
waterstation.technology performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.0 s
85/100
10%
Value7.0 s
6/100
25%
Value2.0 s
99/100
10%
Value340 ms
74/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value7.2 s
50/100
10%
82 ms
38 ms
35 ms
23 ms
30 ms
Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Waterstation.technology, 42% (15 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 33% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (532 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 372.2 kB (42%)
885.9 kB
513.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Waterstation.technology main page is 885.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 414.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 317.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 317.6 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 51.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Water Station needs image optimization as it can save up to 51.9 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 2.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (50%)
20
10
The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Water Station. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.waterstation.technology
82 ms
minified.js
38 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
35 ms
polyfill.min.js
23 ms
thunderbolt-commons.67e14581.bundle.min.js
30 ms
main.5ab8d530.bundle.min.js
144 ms
lodash.min.js
29 ms
react.production.min.js
142 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
144 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
157 ms
wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js
156 ms
837f3b_bc6871263985468abeb076ae82d072bd.png
337 ms
bundle.min.js
63 ms
837f3b_7ea6e98f2d264d109ea82fb690758317.jpg
193 ms
837f3b_6ba6455b042e496994db134530b458cd.png
373 ms
837f3b_aaa387ba9490416895bd693bf241c03c.png
376 ms
837f3b_dde98bf49534444299811af654d0be6a~mv2_d_1536_4623_s_2.png
532 ms
115 ms
110 ms
115 ms
111 ms
110 ms
110 ms
153 ms
148 ms
147 ms
149 ms
146 ms
145 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
6 ms
bolt-performance
26 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
5 ms
right-arrow.svg
20 ms
WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff
5 ms
WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff
7 ms
WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff
6 ms
waterstation.technology accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
waterstation.technology best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
waterstation.technology SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Waterstation.technology can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Waterstation.technology main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
waterstation.technology
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Water Station. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: