3.1 sec in total
364 ms
2.6 sec
120 ms
Click here to check amazing Wax2005 content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about wax2005.com
Wax2005.com
Visit wax2005.comWe analyzed Wax2005.com page load time and found that the first response time was 364 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
wax2005.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
17/100
10%
Value4.4 s
40/100
25%
Value6.6 s
38/100
10%
Value30 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.127
82/100
15%
Value4.7 s
79/100
10%
364 ms
722 ms
35 ms
70 ms
90 ms
Our browser made a total of 28 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Wax2005.com, 25% (7 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 11% (3 requests) were made to Assets.jimstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (917 ms) relates to the external source Image.jimcdn.com.
Page size can be reduced by 569.7 kB (39%)
1.5 MB
897.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Wax2005.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 655.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 27.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.9 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 42.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wax2005 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 348.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 348.4 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 151.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wax2005.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 151.1 kB or 75% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (58%)
24
10
The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wax2005. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.wax2005.com
364 ms
layout.css
722 ms
ownbgr.css.64a8890424c831809fe2076b99a6edaa.css
35 ms
web.js.81df69f80213857d0c7a.js
70 ms
css
90 ms
css
101 ms
image.png
187 ms
web_unresponsive.css.971844ad255ad24c3140ee452a28b763.css
63 ms
image.png
917 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTY3LH2FgLjViKkqswU-xtII.ttf
64 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
74 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzI3LH2FgLjViKkqswU-xtII.ttf
112 ms
all.js
22 ms
ga.js
72 ms
analytics.js
101 ms
loginstate
273 ms
160 ms
xd_arbiter.php
26 ms
xd_arbiter.php
59 ms
__utm.gif
20 ms
__utm.gif
31 ms
collect
13 ms
collect
17 ms
ping
59 ms
collect
12 ms
like.php
95 ms
wy1X4hBW7e7.js
25 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
13 ms
wax2005.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
wax2005.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
wax2005.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
SV
JA
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wax2005.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Swedish is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Japanese language. Our system also found out that Wax2005.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wax2005.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wax2005. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: