3.2 sec in total
178 ms
2.5 sec
516 ms
Welcome to waxspace.in homepage info - get ready to check Waxspace best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about waxspace.in
Get cheap web hosting India @ 49/month. Waxspace is a No.1 WordPress Web Hosting, best hosting in India, cheap and best domain hosting in India, best website hosting, hosting providers in India, best ...
Visit waxspace.inWe analyzed Waxspace.in page load time and found that the first response time was 178 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
waxspace.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
51/100
10%
Value9.3 s
1/100
25%
Value6.7 s
36/100
10%
Value1,220 ms
20/100
30%
Value0.726
6/100
15%
Value13.4 s
11/100
10%
178 ms
399 ms
90 ms
166 ms
232 ms
Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Waxspace.in, 19% (14 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to and 8% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (800 ms) belongs to the original domain Waxspace.in.
Page size can be reduced by 103.1 kB (18%)
559.0 kB
455.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Waxspace.in main page is 559.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 312.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 75.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 37.4 kB, which is 43% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 75.0 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Waxspace images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 25.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 900 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Waxspace.in has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (80%)
59
12
The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Waxspace. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
waxspace.in
178 ms
waxspace.in
399 ms
bootstrap.css
90 ms
stack-interface.css
166 ms
socicon.css
232 ms
lightbox.min.css
232 ms
flickity.css
235 ms
iconsmind.css
344 ms
jquery.steps.css
247 ms
theme.css
330 ms
custom.css
308 ms
css
42 ms
icon
58 ms
flaticon.css
308 ms
font-awesome.css
313 ms
js
70 ms
waxspace-logo.png
340 ms
sale-hosting-domain.png
433 ms
jquery-3.1.1.min.js
592 ms
flickity.min.js
432 ms
easypiechart.min.js
432 ms
parallax.min.js
432 ms
typed.min.js
431 ms
datepicker.min.js
591 ms
isotope.min.js
590 ms
ytplayer.min.js
589 ms
lightbox.min.js
590 ms
granim.min.js
588 ms
jquery.steps.min.js
740 ms
countdown.min.js
742 ms
twitterfetcher.min.js
742 ms
spectragram.min.js
740 ms
smooth-scroll.min.js
741 ms
scripts.min.js
741 ms
plugins.min.js
800 ms
waxspace-header-img.png
623 ms
Slider1.webp
621 ms
Slider3.webp
621 ms
Slider2.webp
620 ms
hosting-domain-ssl.png
447 ms
softaculous.png
622 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
231 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
277 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVc.ttf
314 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
314 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
314 ms
stack-interface.woff
545 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexQ.ttf
162 ms
iconsmind.woff
745 ms
Flaticon.svg
461 ms
Flaticon.woff
394 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
460 ms
socicon.ttf
395 ms
default
235 ms
twk-arr-find-polyfill.js
60 ms
twk-object-values-polyfill.js
101 ms
twk-event-polyfill.js
101 ms
twk-entries-polyfill.js
98 ms
twk-iterator-polyfill.js
98 ms
twk-promise-polyfill.js
99 ms
twk-main.js
66 ms
twk-vendor.js
100 ms
twk-chunk-vendors.js
111 ms
twk-chunk-common.js
124 ms
twk-runtime.js
123 ms
twk-app.js
125 ms
roundtrip.js
20 ms
index.js
276 ms
widget-settings
174 ms
VCYS6LA57FE6FBPOKFGN47
19 ms
YY6SYUDKLRCJTEYSALPPZ3.js
297 ms
en.js
27 ms
waxspace.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
waxspace.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
waxspace.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Waxspace.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Waxspace.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
waxspace.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Waxspace. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: