6.3 sec in total
921 ms
5.1 sec
352 ms
Visit wear.best now to see the best up-to-date WEAR content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about wear.best
Based in Leeds, BEST clothing understands the theory that fashion never fades. We provide our customers with exceptional new and reworked clothing sourced from around the globe and handmade in to one ...
Visit wear.bestWe analyzed Wear.best page load time and found that the first response time was 921 ms and then it took 5.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
wear.best performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
69/100
10%
Value10.8 s
0/100
25%
Value4.9 s
65/100
10%
Value940 ms
29/100
30%
Value0.07
96/100
15%
Value8.9 s
34/100
10%
921 ms
27 ms
167 ms
249 ms
412 ms
Our browser made a total of 96 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (76 requests) were addressed to the original Wear.best, 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Wear.best.
Page size can be reduced by 5.9 MB (86%)
6.9 MB
968.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Wear.best main page is 6.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 37.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.5 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, WEAR needs image optimization as it can save up to 4.5 MB or 89% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 939.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 939.0 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 483.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wear.best needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 483.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 71 (77%)
92
21
The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of WEAR. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 51 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
wear.best
921 ms
css
27 ms
calendar-win2k-1.css
167 ms
font-awesome.min.css
249 ms
bootstrap.min.css
412 ms
flexisel.hack.css
169 ms
styles.css
512 ms
widgets.css
318 ms
blog.css
329 ms
magicaccordion.css
331 ms
magicmenu.css
488 ms
ajaxcart.css
480 ms
magicsocial.css
494 ms
cartreservation.css
501 ms
animate.css
573 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
641 ms
quickview.css
646 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
657 ms
magicslider.css
665 ms
prototype.js
987 ms
ccard.js
730 ms
validation.js
878 ms
builder.js
802 ms
effects.js
894 ms
dragdrop.js
896 ms
controls.js
972 ms
slider.js
963 ms
js.js
1120 ms
form.js
1052 ms
menu.js
1053 ms
translate.js
1125 ms
cookies.js
1131 ms
jquery.min.js
1378 ms
jquery.noconflict.js
1217 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1306 ms
jquery.flexisel.hack.js
1276 ms
jquery.alothemes.js
1286 ms
css
22 ms
oct.js
56 ms
conversion.js
60 ms
responsive.css
1227 ms
magicproduct.js
1251 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
1286 ms
jquery.meanmenu.hack.js
1219 ms
magicaccordion.js
1164 ms
magicmenu.js
1219 ms
product.js
1308 ms
ajaxcart.js
1215 ms
jquery-1.9.1.min.js
1380 ms
jquery.countdown.js
1221 ms
configurable.js
1144 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
1293 ms
quickview.js
1275 ms
calendar.js
1383 ms
calendar-setup.js
1155 ms
jquery.bxslider.hack.min.js
1388 ms
modernizr.custom.min.js
1299 ms
selectivizr.js
1366 ms
matchMedia.js
1238 ms
matchMedia.addListener.js
1221 ms
enquire.js
1240 ms
app.js
1386 ms
imagesloaded.js
1236 ms
jquery.elevateZoom-3.0.8.min.js
1293 ms
cart.js
1221 ms
bundle.js
1184 ms
logo.jpg
262 ms
march_sale.jpg
684 ms
topman_topshop.png
1892 ms
best.jpg
427 ms
men15.jpg
287 ms
women15.jpg
427 ms
junior15.jpg
583 ms
ga.js
16 ms
__utm.gif
43 ms
zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYMDdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
8 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
602 ms
huS3LqUVhEY
126 ms
bg-li-footer.png
521 ms
adsct
155 ms
adsct
83 ms
fbds.js
114 ms
quickview.png
413 ms
bx_loader.gif
566 ms
button-previous.png
579 ms
button-next.png
579 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
45 ms
www-embed-player.js
79 ms
base.js
118 ms
96 ms
266 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
22 ms
ad_status.js
88 ms
CrYjSnGjrRCn0pd9VQsnFOvvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.woff
83 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUbO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff
84 ms
print.css
83 ms
wear.best accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
wear.best best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
wear.best SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wear.best can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wear.best main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wear.best
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of WEAR. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: